User talk:Reshamjung

May 2018
Hello, I'm KatnissEverdeen. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Limbu people have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. Katniss  May the odds be ever in your favor ♥  21:03, 31 May 2018 (UTC)

Thank you for your contributions. Please mark your edits as "minor" only if they are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you. --David Biddulph (talk) 21:19, 31 May 2018 (UTC)

June 2018
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Limbu people has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 19:53, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Limbu people was changed by Reshamjung (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.890351 on 2018-06-17T19:53:05+00:00.

Stop removing sourced content from Gurkha
Please stop removing sourced content from Gurkha. No one is fooled by your sneaky edit summaries either. WP is rather used to the constant caste-warring in articles on Indian ethnic groups, and there's pretty little tolerance for it. If you have an issue with the material, a) discuss it on the article's talk page, and b) back it up with reliable references. Constant disruption will likely lead to you getting blocked. -- Elmidae (talk · contribs) 06:52, 20 June 2018 (UTC)

September 2018
Please do not add or change content, as you did at Chhetri, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 09:07, 1 September 2018 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Limbu people, you may be blocked from editing. Donner60 (talk) 03:05, 30 September 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Dr. Gopal Gurung


The article Dr. Gopal Gurung has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp/dated tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one. FitIndia Talk 11:46, 15 October 2018 (UTC)

Your contributed article, Dr. Gopal Gurung


Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Dr. Gopal Gurung. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Gopal Gurung. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Gopal Gurung. If you have new information to add, you might want to discuss it at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Jmertel23 (talk) 12:08, 16 October 2018 (UTC)

January 2019
Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Chhetri have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Materialscientist (talk) 09:01, 5 January 2019 (UTC)

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Materialscientist (talk) 09:03, 5 January 2019 (UTC)

Note also that your disruptive edits were marked as minor when they obviously didn't meet the criteria at Help:Minor edit. You were warned about this at above, so please take the trouble, during the time of your block, to read that again. --David Biddulph (talk) 09:14, 5 January 2019 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Thapa dynasty. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you.  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   13:22, 24 January 2019 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Sherpa people. Obviously not learned from previous block, Still vandalising (and also still deceptively marking all edits as minor despite numerous previous warnings). David Biddulph (talk) 13:26, 24 January 2019 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistent addition of unsourced content, refusal to discuss. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Yamaguchi先生 (talk) 22:06, 24 January 2019 (UTC)