User talk:Resowithrae

Delhi fire
Hi there, thanks for trying to improve the articles. Regarding this edit, the bolded text was not necessary and have been removed by another editor. Please feel free to add text but, avoid bold text unless there are strong reasons to do that. see WP:MOS for more. -- D Big X ray ᗙ  09:33, 11 December 2019 (UTC)

July 2020
Hello, I'm Prahlad balaji. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Mohawk College, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page.   ◊ PRAHLAD balaji  (M•T•A•C) This message was left at 17:27, 4 July 2020 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Magnolia677. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Peel District School Board seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Magnolia677 (talk) 14:58, 10 July 2020 (UTC)

WKRP in Cincinnati
That's a delightful anecdote you added to the article, but it appears to be ultimately sourced to a wiki which is almost always not a reliable source. I didn't check to see if the wiki had a link to a reliable source so perhaps it could be properly sourced.-- S Philbrick (Talk)  14:45, 25 October 2020 (UTC)

The content you added was copied from another website, and thus was a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policy. Please don't add copyright material to Wikipedia. — Diannaa (talk) 19:19, 25 October 2020 (UTC)

Style, grammar, cohesion
Hi! I see that you have edited a good number of articles "for style, grammar, cohesion". That's great, but do please make sure that you understand what you are doing and do not introduce errors. Your edit to Australian Draught, for example, introduced a number of grammatical and spelling mistakes. In particular, please make sure that you are familiar with the variety of English in use in the page (in this case, Australian English); and please do not change the names or titles of organisations and the like – if a book was called the "Clydesdale Stud Book", that is what we write in the article, even if that is archaic or seems "wrong" to you. Thanks, Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 10:04, 22 December 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:43, 29 November 2022 (UTC)