User talk:ResponseEditor

Welcome!
Hello, ResponseEditor, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits did not conform to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may have been removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations verified in reliable, reputable print or online sources or in other reliable media. Always provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or. Again, welcome. S Philbrick (Talk)  19:11, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
 * I will add that I do see that you included a court document as a link. however, while it comes as a surprise to many people, we view court documents as primary documents and they are not ideal sources for information.


 * Please see the following for more information:
 * No_original_research-- S Philbrick (Talk)  19:14, 8 January 2020 (UTC)

Final warning
You seem not to have taken note of the warning I just placed.

You cannot use primary documents, especially documentation of court cases that were thrown out (and that fact not noted in the primary document).

If it happens again, you will be blocked.-- S Philbrick (Talk)  19:57, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
 * I'm going to cut you a little bit of slack, because while you did it again, the timing is very close to my final warning so there's a chance you haven't yet seen it. S Philbrick  (Talk)  20:12, 8 January 2020 (UTC)

How can I speak with you. The edits I made were accurate and Bill Sipper was found guilty: https://www.justice.gov/usao-dc/pr/new-jersey-man-pleads-guilty-sexually-assaulting-colleague-during-business-trip-district
 * You can post here and ping me. Assuming you don't know how to do that, you can post at my talk page. I created a location:
 * User_talk:Sphilbrick
 * The last link you provided is a primary source. Has it been covered by a reliable newspaper? S Philbrick (Talk)  21:41, 8 January 2020 (UTC)