User talk:Respublik/Archive 1

Nomination of 2016 in Lithuanian football for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2016 in Lithuanian football is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/2016 in Lithuanian football until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Magioladitis (talk) 20:13, 1 June 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 2
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2016 A Lyga, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Francisco Flores. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:58, 2 June 2016 (UTC)

December 2016
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Simonas Stankevičius, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. GiantSnowman 09:16, 5 December 2016 (UTC)

Welcome to STiki!
Note: Having a username change after you start using STiki will reset your classification count. Please let us know about such changes on the talk page page to avoid confusion in issuing milestone awards. You can also request for your previous STiki contributions to be reassigned to your new account name.

Sympathy for the Devil
Please provide your reasoning on the article's talk page. The information you have re-inserted was unsourced and original research, and if you view the history of the page has been an issue in the past. 72.24.168.117 (talk) 13:02, 9 January 2017 (UTC)

April 2017
Hello, I'm Babymissfortune. Your recent edit to the page 2017 Chinese Grand Prix appears to have added incorrect information, so I have removed it for now. If you believe the information was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Baby miss fortune 04:21, 17 April 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of 2017 Lithuanian Football Cup


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on 2017 Lithuanian Football Cup requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Gaioa (talk) 17:13, 18 April 2017 (UTC)

May 2017
Please do not add or change content, as you did at Vytautas Černiauskas, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. GiantSnowman 14:30, 22 May 2017 (UTC)

Edit conflicts
Have we not been over this before? Please stop creating all these edit conflicts all the time with your small partial (and sometimes incorrect) edits. I am updating everything correctly and it would go a lot faster without your disruption. Please read the in use-tag put on the article. Qed237&#160;(talk) 18:04, 6 July 2017 (UTC)
 * All of the provided information in these edits was provided correctly and I think the fact that you provided literally the same code proves that. Also none of these edits weren't small and irrelevant it just uses section by section method versus your match by match and due to that it isn't violating provided template... Respublik (talk) 18:16, 6 July 2017 (UTC)
 * I guess you missed the most important part so I will give it to you in bold: To help avoid edit conflicts, please do not edit this page while this message is displayed. Qed237&#160;(talk) 18:19, 6 July 2017 (UTC)
 * If my knowledge is correct this template is used to discourage people from irrelevant changes. Once again I wouldn't say that these suits such description and actually that's why I personally use section by section to make the process quicker and to not interrupt edits by others. Well of course every editor is free to contribute in a way they see it, I'll leave the article for now than :) Respublik (talk) 19:09, 6 July 2017 (UTC)

Rollback granted
Hi Respublik. After reviewing your request for "rollbacker", I have [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special%3ALog&type=rights&user=&page=User%3ARespublik enabled] rollback on your account. Keep in mind these things when going to use rollback: If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see Administrators' guide/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing!  Malinaccier ( talk ) 19:12, 6 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Getting rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle.
 * Rollback should be used to revert clear cases of vandalism only, and not good faith edits.
 * Rollback should never be used to edit war.
 * If abused, rollback rights can be revoked.
 * Use common sense.

Speedy deletion nomination of Template:Fb team Trakai B


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created, Template:Fb team Trakai B, was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Gbawden (talk) 11:53, 31 October 2017 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:A Lyga 2017.svg
Thanks for uploading File:A Lyga 2017.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:09, 13 May 2018 (UTC)

Pending changes reviewer granted
Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.

Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

See also: Swarm talk  08:07, 6 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Reviewing pending changes, the guideline on reviewing
 * Pending changes, the summary of the use of pending changes
 * Protection policy, the policy determining which pages can be given pending changes protection by administrators.

Orphaned non-free image File:Fk Palanga.png
Thanks for uploading File:Fk Palanga.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:34, 3 October 2019 (UTC)