User talk:Restless Dance Theatre

October 2015
Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia, as you did to Restless Dance Theatre. While objective prose about beliefs, organisations, people, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not intended to be a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. Thank you. Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 08:02, 7 October 2015 (UTC)

Your username
Welcome to Wikipedia. I saw that you edited or created Restless Dance Theatre, and I noticed that your username, "Restless Dance Theatre", may not comply with our username policy. Please note that you may not use a username that represents the name of a company, group, organization, product, or website. Examples of usernames that are not allowed include "XYZ Company", "MyWidgetsUSA.com", and "Trammel Museum of Art". However, you are invited to use a username that contains such a name if it identifies you personally, such as "Mark at WidgetsUSA", "Jack Smith at the XY Foundation", and "WidgetFan87".

Please also note that Wikipedia does not allow accounts to be shared by multiple people, and that you may not advocate for or promote any company, group, organization, product, or website, regardless of your username. Moreover, I recommend that you read our conflict of interest guideline. If you are a single individual and are willing to contribute to Wikipedia in an unbiased manner, please create a new account or request a change of username, by completing this form, that complies with our username policy. If you believe that your username does not violate our policy, please leave a note here explaining why. Thank you. Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 08:03, 7 October 2015 (UTC)

October 2015
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you use Wikipedia for soapboxing, promotion or advertising, as you did at Restless Dance Theatre. ''Every time you do these edits you actually remove every single one of the proper independent references in the article. Those references are the only reason why the article is allowed to exist on Wikipedia. Please, please please I'm begging you to stop this! Your promotional edits are only harming the reputation of the company. If you wish to add (without removing any of the already existing content) more reviews to the article you MUST provide proper references in the form of the complete publication details of the review - who wrote it and where and when it was published. But before you do that you are required to read and follow the instructions of the conflict of interest guide.'' Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 11:16, 13 October 2015 (UTC)