User talk:RetiredWikipedian789/Archives/2009/August

RfA !vote (Headbomb)
I've update the nomination. Since this was part of your justification for your oppose, I thought I'd let you know so you can review your !vote if it is outdated following the update. Regards. Headbomb {{{sup|ταλκ}}κοντριβς – WP Physics} 23:17, 10 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Hi, thanks for clarifying your intent, however I have to remain opposed. You can get a better understanding of my reasoning at your RfA page.  SparksBoy (talk) 05:17, 11 August 2009 (UTC)

Thanks
Thanks for your participation in my recent RfA. I will do my very best not to betray the confidence you have shown me. If you ever have any questions or suggestions about my conduct as an administrator or as an editor please don't hesitate to contact me. Once again, thanks. ·Maunus· ƛ · 04:40, 19 August 2009 (UTC)

RfA !vote (Headbomb)
I've update the nomination. Since this was part of your justification for your oppose, I thought I'd let you know so you can review your !vote if it is outdated following the update. Regards. Headbomb {{{sup|ταλκ}}κοντριβς – WP Physics} 23:17, 10 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Hi, thanks for clarifying your intent, however I have to remain opposed. You can get a better understanding of my reasoning at your RfA page.  SparksBoy (talk) 05:17, 11 August 2009 (UTC)

Thanks
Thanks for your participation in my recent RfA. I will do my very best not to betray the confidence you have shown me. If you ever have any questions or suggestions about my conduct as an administrator or as an editor please don't hesitate to contact me. Once again, thanks. ·Maunus· ƛ · 04:40, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Haha no problem... I remember trying to type something, but then I had another idea and deleted it all, and then wanted to go back to my original comment, so I got frustrated and just wrote that :D  SparksBoy (talk) 06:54, 24 August 2009 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 20:00, 27 August 2009 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Jaime Milner
Would you consider reviewing your decision. I do not believe A7 applies here. Not to sound like I am attacking, but maybe you should put some research into the topic before you decline :)? Thanks  SparksBoy (talk) 05:24, 30 August 2009 (UTC)

yes i would i always word do that  one more thing thanks for help thats what afc is for people helping people right. i said no because of the sources for one correct me if i am wrong but imdb and myspace are not really consider sources or not really good one right correct and thats all the article sources at the bottom listed thats why i said noOo7565 (talk) 05:31, 30 August 2009 (UTC)