User talk:RetiredWikipedian789/Archives/2009/October

DYK nomination of Georgia Mining Company
Hello! Your submission of Georgia Mining Company at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know!

To add to that, I've moved the article to Georgia Marble Company, since that seems to be what you were talking about. It's a very interesting topic though, and would be great to have on DYK. -Kieran (talk) 01:02, 1 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Oh, and I found this site if you're interested - it has a bibliography on the company. Most of the sources will require some physical legwork at a library to track down, though. Good luck! -Kieran (talk) 01:09, 1 October 2009 (UTC)
 * I am interested, but simply do not have the resources to go to the library at this point in time, however I bookmarked it so I can expand on the article later. I have made a few edits that should take care of the problems, and I edited the DYK heading and the actual DYK to make it accurate. Thanks for your help  SparksBoy (talk) 01:20, 1 October 2009 (UTC)
 * I tell you what, that Georgia Digital Library site is full of interesting info, and should be a reliable source. I would go crazy with that (you could easily expand the article several fold over), and try and keep use of the 1884 journal article to a minimum - that's just a little but out of date... -Kieran (talk) 05:07, 1 October 2009 (UTC)
 * The DYK still needs a little work - see my latest comment. -Kieran (talk) 05:17, 1 October 2009 (UTC)

Re: your DYK post. There is no need to worry if a DYK nomination moves down without apparent activity - when it reaches the bottom it will inevitably be reviewed. I leave assessing this nomination to Kieran, but the article has improved, and if he doesn't respond, it will probably be approved. Materialscientist (talk) 00:36, 7 October 2009 (UTC)

Abuse response
Hey! Thanks for helping out in abuse response! We're still in the process of reorganizing, so its nice to have more people help out. I'm pretty sure the complete guide for volunteers was either never created or was lost in the confusing process of total cleanup... So if you have any questions, feel free to ask me on my talk page or ask any other member that has been helping out in the cleanup process. Thanks! By the way, do you have a Google Talk or AIM? We tend to communicate off of Wikipedia since its more effective. Netalarm  talk  23:01, 13 October 2009 (UTC)
 * I have been wanting to help out, but didn't know if just anyone could help out. I thought I would edit, and see if I got something on my userpage telling me no. I really appreciate the welcome, lol. I just installed google talk, as my AIM is sorta laggy. My google talk is dkfuryss (I totally forgot about that email lols, was already created). I am not sure how it works, but if you tell me how to add someone or work with it I learn easy.. SparksBoy  (talk) 23:18, 13 October 2009 (UTC)

Editor review archived
Since it has been well over 30 days since you requested to be reviewed, I've gone ahead and archived your request as part of my effort to cleanup Editor Review. You may view your review here. Thanks & happy editing. If you have any questions, please message me on my talk page. =D Netalarm   talk  00:06, 23 October 2009 (UTC)