User talk:Retired User 12346/Archive 1

Welcome!
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. We appreciate encyclopedic contributions, but some of your recent contributions, such as your edit to the page Historic center of Mexico City, have removed content without a good reason to do so. Content on Wikipedia should not be removed just because you disagree with it or because you think it's wrong, unless the claim is not verifiable. Instead, you should consider expanding the article with noteworthy and verifiable information of your own, citing reliable sources when you do so. If you'd like to experiment with the wiki's syntax, please do so in the sandbox rather than in articles. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Editing tutorial
 * Picture tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Naming conventions
 * Simplified Manual of Style
 * Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia:
 * Respect copyrights – do not copy and paste text or images directly from other websites.
 * Maintain a neutral point of view – this is one of Wikipedia's core policies.
 * Take particular care while adding biographical material about a living person to any Wikipedia page and follow Wikipedia's Biography of Living Persons policy. Particularly, controversial and negative statements should be referenced with multiple reliable sources.
 * No edit warring or abuse of multiple accounts.
 * If you are testing, please use the Sandbox to [ do so].
 * Do not add troublesome content to any article, such as: copyrighted text, libel, advertising or promotional messages, and text that is not related to an article's subject; doing so will result in your account or IP being blocked from editing.
 * Do not use talk pages as discussion or forum pages as Wikipedia is not a forum.

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! (CC) Tb hotch ™ 00:05, 15 December 2021 (UTC)

RE: Bicitaxis
"i see no reason" means that it is your opinion, not a legitimate reason to exclude them. Even if the service was limited to 10 bicitaxis, the service is existent. Wikipedia reports on facts backed up by sources, and if three sources are describing the service, then the service exists and is reported as such. (CC) Tb hotch ™ 02:00, 15 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Number 1, I don't have to provide sources for anything. You are new here and maybe you don't understand the WP:Purpose of Wikipedia. Number 2, if you had attempted to do the research yourself, you would have found this and this. Number 3, as I already said, you are new. However, you are not exempted from being blocked for WP:editwarring. If you persist to do it, I'll have to request your account to be blocked. Number 4, that the information is old is not an excuse to remove content, especially when you could have easily looked for such information to be updated. (CC) Tb hotch ™ 02:19, 15 December 2021 (UTC)
 * So just because they are not "common" (according to your very personal opinion on the word "common") they are not a valid method of transportation? I'm sorry, but you just want to be right for the seek of being right. (CC) Tb hotch ™ 02:31, 15 December 2021 (UTC)
 * If the problem is how a sentence is written, just reword it, you don't need to erase the whole sentence and the respective sources. (CC) Tb hotch ™ 02:46, 15 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Because I have to complete right to edit that page. First you were complaining that it was outdated, now you are complaining that it is updated. What do you want? (CC) Tb hotch ™ 03:14, 15 December 2021 (UTC)

December 2021
Your recent editing history at Historic center of Mexico City shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. (CC) Tb hotch ™ 03:15, 15 December 2021 (UTC)

ANI notification
There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. (CC) Tb hotch ™ 03:46, 15 December 2021 (UTC)