User talk:Retired User 21082022

Your GA nomination of Homelessness of Jesus
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Homelessness of Jesus you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kingoflettuce -- Kingoflettuce (talk) 16:01, 25 March 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Homelessness of Jesus
The article Homelessness of Jesus you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Homelessness of Jesus for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kingoflettuce -- Kingoflettuce (talk) 21:40, 25 March 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Homelessness of Jesus
The article Homelessness of Jesus you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Homelessness of Jesus for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kingoflettuce -- Kingoflettuce (talk) 12:41, 26 March 2022 (UTC)

ChaalBaaz
Hi, I need some help. I'm currently working on the article ChaalBaaz and while adding the principal photography part, I cannot find suitable references. If you can kindly help me out by providing them, it'll be highly beneficial. I have searched a lot but still haven't come across any. Sahajitbro (talk) 07:02, 5 April 2022 (UTC)

Copyedited
Hi, I have just copyedited John 3:16 as a GOCE member. However, I am not very apt with theology – would you mind taking a look at the article and add more context to the tagged sentences? CactiStaccingCrane (talk) 12:36, 5 April 2022 (UTC)
 * I am also not an expert in theology but I believe that I have addressed all the issues in the article. —Nicholas Michael Halim (talk) 03:27, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Thanks! I will take a look again later to fix all the remaining grammar issues. CactiStaccingCrane (talk) 07:01, 6 April 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of John 3:16
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article John 3:16 you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jenhawk777 -- Jenhawk777 (talk) 03:40, 26 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Hello! I am Jenhawk777 - not a bot - and I wanted to be sure you knew I have begun the review. I don't want to overwhelm you, so I will not do more until the items I have already noted are finished. I am looking forward to helping you take this article to GA. Jenhawk777 (talk) 17:14, 27 April 2022 (UTC)

Book of Mormon pseudohistory
I'm of the opinion that the category belongs on that article's page, which you added. It was reverted, and when I re-added it, it was removed again. Seems like there's a sizable Mormon base among editors that doesn't like that category. Where to go for discussion on something like this without involving people with a conflict of interest? JimKaatFan (talk) 20:28, 27 April 2022 (UTC)


 * I know. I never hear people anyone who study this book ever prove anything it mentioned in history. While people try so hard to be as neutral and encyclopedic as they can while editing about Jesus (especially his resurrection, which has many apologists), the Book of Mormon (which I think is more famous than him for being so controversial) got little attention from those neutrality warriors. If you want to start a discussion, you can go the talk page for every articles. For the Book of Mormon, visit Talk:Book of Mormon. —Nicholas Michael Halim (talk) 22:13, 27 April 2022 (UTC)


 * Involving people with a conflict of interest (one way or another) is pretty much unavoidable anywhere on Wikipedia, since they're the ones most likely to have any affected articles watchlisted. Anyways, besides your suggestion of taking it to each individual articles talk page which is certainly a valid approach, I think WP:NPOVN might be the most appropriate board to address the whole category/categories in one location (which, as I just now indicated on Talk:Historicity of the Book of Mormon, are my thoughts for moving forward, but YMMV). Cheers. VernoWhitney (talk) 15:08, 28 April 2022 (UTC)


 * Oh, I didn't know that such page exists. Thank you for telling me that. I will start a discussion there ASAP! —Nicholas Michael Halim (talk) 04:21, 29 April 2022 (UTC)


 * and Oh my goodness, I am too scared to start a discussion on WP:NPOVN. Once I click the button publish, many pings will appear in my notification. Would you like to help me? It's not a force. If you say yes, I will start the discussion. If no, I will not. I am too scared, once again! —Nicholas Michael Halim (talk) 08:02, 29 April 2022 (UTC)

Please don't get discouraged
I understand your frustration - precisely because I ran into the same types of things at a different topic, and I actually took a long break from editing entirely. Another editor brought me back by working on a different article that I'd put some effort into, and I realized that quitting is not the answer. The answer is to engage in discussion and try to enter factual information while removing non-factual information. If you run into resistance, I have found that discussion, and inviting more discussion from uninvolved editors, will usually result in truth triumphing over everything else. If I can help you with any topic, please don't hesitate to ask. JimKaatFan (talk) 12:18, 1 May 2022 (UTC)


 * The Mormons will use this premises of argument:


 * 1) We believe in X (the Bible, containing the Old Testament and the New Testament) and Y (the Book of Mormon) to be historical.
 * 2) The X contains story that is primarily unproved by archaeology, therefore it is mostly mythical, as is Y, but the X does not included in the Pseudohistory category.
 * 3) Therefore, the Book of Mormon is not either.


 * Just see the way the argue here. They will bring another thing that seems like what they are talking about in order to validate their argument, which is stupid. The way they argue will not lead you to anywhere but the waste of your valuable lifetime. They seem do not realise that the Bible never claims to be written by the hand of God but actually a record written by humans but they will not stop there; they will bring other religious texts such as the Quran, the Kabbalah, the Bhagavad Gita, etc. Please rethink to argue with them; it is easy if you are talking only to one person, at least if they did not call you boring, but if there are many, it will be a huge problem. —Nicholas Michael Halim (talk) 12:30, 1 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Nah, it's just the internet. Even if I did have a huge number of people calling me "boring" or anything else on these talk pages, I can't see how that would affect my real life. Therefore, it wouldn't be a problem for me. JimKaatFan (talk) 12:34, 1 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Ok, let's see in two days. It's currently night in my country and tomorrow I will go somewhere. —Nicholas Michael Halim (talk) 12:36, 1 May 2022 (UTC)

TFL notification
Hi, Nicholas. I'm just posting to let you know that List of accolades received by Veer-Zaara – a list that you have been heavily involved with – has been chosen to appear on the Main Page as Today's featured list for May 27. The TFL blurb can be seen here. If you have any thoughts on the selection, please post them on my talk page or at TFL talk. Regards, Giants2008  ( Talk ) 21:44, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Please note that I decided to move the date back to June 3, since we had a couple of date-relevant requests for other lists to appear on the 27th and 30th. The new date's blurb can be found here. Cheers. Giants2008  ( Talk ) 15:32, 14 May 2022 (UTC)

Request for Comment
There is a Request for Comment at Talk:Historicity_of_the_Book_of_Mormon that asks for input on a question you were previously involved with. JimKaatFan (talk) 22:51, 3 May 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of John 3:16
The article John 3:16 you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:John 3:16 for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jenhawk777 -- Jenhawk777 (talk) 05:21, 4 May 2022 (UTC)

What Every Christian Needs to Know About the Qur'an moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, What Every Christian Needs to Know About the Qur'an, is not suitable as written to remain published. It is far too extensive a summary, and it is strongly biased in support of the authors views. The discussion of reception ofthe book includes only sources opposed to Islam. Please see WP:NPOV and rewrite accordingly. I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.  DGG ( talk ) 06:58, 23 May 2022 (UTC)


 * Please give me a week. Thank you. —Nicholas Michael Halim (talk) 07:00, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
 * you actually have 6 months time to improve it, but you are right that it's better not to put if off. Good luck with it !  DGG ( talk ) 17:46, 23 May 2022 (UTC)

What Every Christian Needs to Know About the Qur'an moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, What Every Christian Needs to Know About the Qur'an, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. PRAXIDICAE💕 14:58, 23 May 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Naushadnama
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Naushadnama you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Figureskatingfan -- Figureskatingfan (talk) 20:01, 4 June 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Naushadnama
The article Naushadnama you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Naushadnama for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Figureskatingfan -- Figureskatingfan (talk) 20:42, 5 June 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Minsara Kanavu
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Minsara Kanavu you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of ArcticSeeress -- ArcticSeeress (talk) 13:00, 7 June 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Minsara Kanavu
The article Minsara Kanavu you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Minsara Kanavu for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of ArcticSeeress -- ArcticSeeress (talk) 15:00, 7 June 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Ten Years with Guru Dutt
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Ten Years with Guru Dutt you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of ArcticSeeress -- ArcticSeeress (talk) 20:41, 7 June 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Ten Years with Guru Dutt
The article Ten Years with Guru Dutt you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Ten Years with Guru Dutt for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of ArcticSeeress -- ArcticSeeress (talk) 21:21, 7 June 2022 (UTC)

Pakeezah articles
Hi. I was intending to review Pakeezah for GA, but I then noticed that you had also created Production of Pakeezah as a separate article and placed it for GA too. Could you please explain your decision to split these two articles? Neither are of such a length that splitting would be mandatory. I would suggest merging the production article back into the main article. AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 18:18, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Sorry, for the late response. Well, the production section (with the soundtrack included) has more than 100 citations so it is long enough in my opinion. —Nicholas Michael Halim (talk) 06:58, 18 June 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Yasser Usman
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Yasser Usman you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Vice regent -- Vice regent (talk) 05:21, 10 June 2022 (UTC)

Editing an article
Hi. Are you interested in editing 1942: A Love Story ? I'm currently working on it. Sahajitbro (talk) 05:35, 10 June 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Production of Pakeezah
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Production of Pakeezah you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Z1720 -- Z1720 (talk) 19:41, 11 June 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Production of Pakeezah
The article Production of Pakeezah you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Production of Pakeezah for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Z1720 -- Z1720 (talk) 20:21, 11 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Hi, are you hoping to work on this nomination? Please respond on the GAN to let me know your intentions with this article. If there's no response, I'll close the nomination in a couple days as unsuccessful. Z1720 (talk) 01:26, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
 * I will start it this day, as late as this night (GMT+7). —Nicholas Michael Halim (talk) 01:29, 17 June 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Dilip Kumar: The Substance and the Shadow
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Dilip Kumar: The Substance and the Shadow you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of AirshipJungleman29 -- AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 19:21, 16 June 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Dilip Kumar: The Substance and the Shadow
The article Dilip Kumar: The Substance and the Shadow you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Dilip Kumar: The Substance and the Shadow for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of AirshipJungleman29 -- AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 13:21, 17 June 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Minsara Kanavu
The article Minsara Kanavu you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Minsara Kanavu for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of ArcticSeeress -- ArcticSeeress (talk) 20:22, 17 June 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Ten Years with Guru Dutt
The article Ten Years with Guru Dutt you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Ten Years with Guru Dutt for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of ArcticSeeress -- ArcticSeeress (talk) 02:21, 18 June 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Dilip Kumar: The Substance and the Shadow
The article Dilip Kumar: The Substance and the Shadow you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Dilip Kumar: The Substance and the Shadow for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of AirshipJungleman29 -- AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 21:01, 20 June 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Pakeezah
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Pakeezah you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Ganesha811 -- Ganesha811 (talk) 12:00, 23 June 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Yasser Usman
The article Yasser Usman you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Yasser Usman for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Vice regent -- Vice regent (talk) 17:01, 24 June 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Pakeezah
The article Pakeezah you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Pakeezah for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Ganesha811 -- Ganesha811 (talk) 20:02, 29 June 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Production of Pakeezah
The article Production of Pakeezah you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Production of Pakeezah for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Z1720 -- Z1720 (talk) 14:03, 5 July 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of categories
I have declined some speedy deletion nominations you have made for some categories, because you gave no valid speedy deletion criterion, and because the categories are not empty. You should first revert any posting into those categories you made, and then if appropriate nominate them for deletion as empty categories, or otherwise take them to Categories for discussion. JBW (talk) 20:00, 8 July 2022 (UTC)

July 2022
I saw you reverted the cast order of the film Nayak. Please tell me how a cast order from a removed article is more reliable than official opening credits from the film? Bollywood Hungama is not associated with the film. Plus sites like Box office India have different cast order https://boxofficeindia.com/movie.php?movieid=671. Pooja Batra played a minor role. She's not 2nd female lead Rtyggu (talk) 11:31, 10 July 2022 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:What Every Christian Needs to Know About the Qur&#39;an cover.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:What Every Christian Needs to Know About the Qur&. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:08, 15 July 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Silsila (1981 film)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Silsila (1981 film) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Mike Christie -- Mike Christie (talk) 04:19, 13 August 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Silsila (1981 film)
The article Silsila (1981 film) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Silsila (1981 film) for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Mike Christie -- Mike Christie (talk) 13:00, 13 August 2022 (UTC)

Minsara Kanavu
Nice work. Noticed that there is no mention that Sapnay was partially reshot. DareshMohan (talk) 22:00, 13 August 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Silsila (1981 film)
The article Silsila (1981 film) you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Silsila (1981 film) for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Mike Christie -- Mike Christie (talk) 09:02, 20 August 2022 (UTC)

Where are you?
Why did you disappear and why did you decide to delete your userpage? Shahid •  Talk 2 me  12:57, 19 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Hi, friend! I’m really, really sorry for this late response and for my sudden quit! I decided to quit Wikipedia because I want to focus on my education. I deleted my userpage because that’s why I should do according to the steps that I got on the Internet to vanish from Wikipedia. That’s it from me. I hope it answers your questions well. Thanks for asking! —Retired User 21082022 (talk) 12:27, 1 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Oh I'm sorry to hear that but I'm happy for you that you took the right decision to further your education. I hope you do decide to come back one day when you have more free time. You've been an extraordinary contributor to the project. Way to go and all the best with your studies! Missing you here. Shahid  •  Talk 2 me  13:40, 1 October 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:41, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Category:Transracial activists has been nominated for merging
Category:Transracial activists has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. ★Trekker (talk) 17:16, 6 March 2023 (UTC)