User talk:Retired username/Archive6

Archived talk stuff. Don't post here.

List of Peabody Award winners
Hiya - just thought I'd let you know I've re-added the wikify tag to this article - it is wikified for the first 1/4 or the article, but from 1981 onwards (currently - I may have made more progress by the time you read this!) it still needs attention! No biggie, I just thought I'd better let you know why I'd done it :) -Ladybirdintheuk 09:40, 12 July 2006 (UTC)

Reply- blocked account
Thanks for the offer to appeal for unblocking my Brando03/ The Br3 account. However, given the status quo of Wikipedia, it is better for me to continue editing as an IP rather than create another account which could be blocked. I have been combating the deletionist yahoos and other mean spirited pedians who have been unfair to what I feel are legitimate edits and aren't interested in diplomacy very agressively, so I'm quit an outlaw right now and being reinstated isn't going to happen. I have still been contributing to articles anyway actively as an IP anyway, so reinstation isn't necessary. Also, I have an account where I moved my home page User:Sirrom nodnarb yerffej), I just don't edit from it with people like JDoorjam and Dumbfu Adam out there who block anyone who disagrees with them. 65.138.71.135 20:54, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
 * W. marsh, I think you're being taken in a bit. Sure, Brandon's edits to U of L were probably fine.  What you may have been unaware of were his hateful personal attacks and comments against jews, muslims, and any editor who removed his attacks.  See this attack, this comment about jews, this userpage where as "Creature of bad habits" he admits to being a sock of Brandon, or perhaps this delightful gem about how the Holocaust was "God's payback" against the Jews.  Talk about "mean-spirited"...
 * Face it. A bigot can be perfectly friendly and sweet on any other topic.  If you never introduced them to that one topic that they can't deal with, you might never suspect they had it in them.  Br3/Brandon03/Creature of bad habits is not the sort of editor we want at Wikipedia.  Take care, Kasreyn 20:46, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Contribs history here is also instructive. Do you really want this sort of user back, W. marsh?  Kasreyn 20:48, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Yeah, for the record I had no intention of letting that kind of crap continue. He really did make a lot of good, factual edits on Kentucky articles... my hope was that he could keep doing that and just cut the other stuff. But since he doesn't seem interested... it's really a moot point and he'll have to be treated as a community banned user. --W.marsh 21:02, 16 July 2006 (UTC)

Beautiful nightmare
I have de-prod'd Beautiful nightmare. The article had been previously nominated for prod and the tag removed. As such, it doesn't qualify for deletion by prod. You may wish to nominate it for AFD. -- JLaTondre 00:51, 17 July 2006 (UTC)

Links other articles to this
Hi! I hope you can help me. I am not sure how to do this.. Since our article is not approved yet.. how do I link other articles to this one.. Go into, lets say Bhakti Yoga.. hit edit for "See Also".. "internal link".. Click on internal link.. and put this in ? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Advanc...es_%28AYP%29

or just typing *Advanced Yoga Practices (AYP) will do the job? Also, the Category: Orphaned articles from July 2006 .. what does that mean? Thank you in advance for all your help.


 * The category and the tag both just mean that links to Advanced Yoga Practices (AYP) need to be created from other articles. You're on the right track, just add Advanced Yoga Practices (AYP) to other articles and that will do the trick. But make sure the other articles are related and relevent, of course. --W.marsh 15:44, 17 July 2006 (UTC)

Need Help Please!!!
Hi, Need some help again. I posted in the article talk page and in my talk page. I am not sure how this goes, so I am going to send you this mesg too. 2 things.. One.. should I post megs on my talk page or the article talk page for them to get picked up?

Second.. The mesg reads..

"To meet Wikipedia's quality standards and conform with our NPOV policy, this article or section may require cleanup. The current version of the article or section reads like an advertisement."

Not sure what I should do to clean up.. I have read the NPOV policy.. but I am not sure what part I could change so this article does not read like an advertisement. Could you guide me to the points that can be neutralized so it looks less like an advertisement and more like a Wikipedia article.

Thanks for your help

Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Shantiayp"

Akrab
I also find it darkly amusing that we have a torture-stub as well as a death-stub. Of course, we also have silly things like knot-stub. *shrug* Wikipedia is a strange place... ~ Amalas rawr  =^_^=  14:21, 19 July 2006 (UTC)

Reverting
Aye, was impolite of me to use popups I must agree, only thought that afterwards. Happy editing! --PopUpPirate 19:41, 20 July 2006 (UTC)

:)


has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling to someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Smile to others by adding {{subst:smile}}, {{subst:smile2}} or {{subst:smile3}} to their talk page with a friendly message. Happy editing! -- Where 21:34, 20 July 2006 (UTC)

thanks
thank you for the correction —Preceding unsigned comment added by Themetalgod (talk • contribs)

How do I get my page back?
I'd like to try to put my page about "Atlas Service Corps" back up but can't find the edit history log. I don't want to start again from scratch because I actually did spend a lot of time on it, making the table and all. Any ideas? —Preceding unsigned comment added by AtlasServiceCorps (talk • contribs)

comment
THANKS TAlK i'm good on facts but not on GRAMMAR i'll leaVE THAT TO YOU.THOUGH YOU COULD EMAIL ME AT BROWNDIO3@AOL.COM TO GIVE ME SOME HINTS —Preceding unsigned comment added by Themetalgod (talk • contribs)

A Request for Protection
Hey... you seem to be an admin active at the moment. Can you take care of protecting the image under DYK, Image:Polski Fiat 125p.jpeg? Thanks in advance. --  tariq abjotu  (joturner) 22:53, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Done. --W.marsh 22:54, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Thanks. --  tariq abjotu  (joturner) 23:12, 23 July 2006 (UTC)

BluegrassReport.org
Thanks for all the good work you're doing in Louisville-related articles.

I'm writing to request help, as somebody who posted to the subject blog has indicated that he intends to cause mischief in the article. Can the subject article be put on some special administrative watch for a period of time?

Thanks in advance for your assistance and continued good works.

By the way, you're very much welcome to join WikiProject Louisville if you have the inclination. &mdash; Stevie is the man!  Talk 03:56, 24 July 2006 (UTC)


 * Thanks... I'll definitely watch BluegrassReport.org and be there if anything troublesome starts... and I've had another admin watch it as well. The article looks pretty good... funny that someone tried to delete it... I wonder if people even read what they're trying to delete sometimes. --W.marsh 04:28, 24 July 2006 (UTC)

WP:PNT
Hi Marsh! You recently listed an article not written in English, Leon Fidel Ojeda. I translated it, and then moved it to León Fidel Ojeda, as the original creator of the article forgot the accent mark. I hope you find my translation satisfactory. Cheers and have a nice day, RyanG e rbil10 (Drop on in!) 19:07, 24 July 2006 (UTC)

re: "Cancer Treatment Centers of America"
Good work! I'm keeping an eye on this guy to make sure he doesn't try anything else cute. He sounds like nothing but a CTCA shill to me. I was willing to leave well enough alone, but good show! --DodgerOfZion 00:57, 25 July 2006 (UTC)

datama
hi there

i'm the author of the datama text that you've flagged as copyright infringement. I wrote the original text on the project blog.

see the datama chat. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Data.ma

let's get this reverted. Thanks David —Preceding unsigned comment added by Zeroinfluencer (talk • contribs)
 * Well you can mention it at Copyright problems/2006 July 25/Articles under the entry there and revert, but it doesn't look like the topic really meets inclusion criteria anyway. Wikipedia is not for promoting your own stuff. --W.marsh 17:03, 25 July 2006 (UTC)

My RfA
Thank you so much! RyanG e rbil10 (The people rejoice!) 03:58, 26 July 2006 (UTC)

Guess Who
Ha ha I have plenty of proof of azythia idaho the tag on blogging is lifted now there is a city website and 2 current blogs. Azythiaidaho.bravehost.com (city website) azythiaidaho.blogspot.com (blog) and someother one i dont know the name of.

Cornish diaspora
I have recreated the Cornish diaspora page (which you had deleted) as a redirect to Cornish emigration. This fixes a lot of redlinks in other articles which had linked to "Cornish diaspora" before it was renamed "Cornish emigration"--DuncanHill 11:58, 27 July 2006 (UTC).

George Rogers Clark Memorial Bridge
A big whopping thanks for creating this article! Cheers! &mdash; Stevie is the man!  Talk 17:59, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
 * No problem, I'd been meaning to do it for a while, now I'm hoping to get to articles on the two rail bridges that don't have articles yet. And thanks to you for fixing the infobox at the bottom... I have a bad habit of getting things like that absolutely backwards. --W.marsh 18:45, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Fixing the infobox was my pleasure. I understand how it's easy to flip that. Perhaps with global warming getting worse, we'll get to switch them again. :) &mdash;  Stevie is the man!  Talk 19:13, 27 July 2006 (UTC)

Wyandotte Caves
Hi. You listed an article at Wyandotte Caves as a copyvio. I have written a replacement, and while the replacement is not as finished as I'd like it to be, I think it would be a good idea to move it into the main namespace so that the pre-existing Wyandotte Cave article, which I did not realize existed prior to writing the replacement for Wyandotte Caves (and which was mainly taken from the 1911 Encyclopedia Britannica), can be made into a re-direct. I have merged all information from that one into the new one, and am farily certian that the article should have an s at the end. See the relevant discussion at Talk:Wyandotte Cave. I was told I should contact you about moving the temp article into the main namespace. ONUnicorn 19:29, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
 * okay, I have removed the copyvio, moved the new article to Wyandotte Caves and merged the history of Wyandotte Cave to Wyandotte Caves (this was necessary since you used that article, we need to preserve contributer histories per the GFDL). I also deleted the temp page, but left its talk page up in case you need it. Let me know if I can do anything else. Thanks. --W.marsh 19:39, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Thank you! ONUnicorn 20:54, 27 July 2006 (UTC)

Christians Against Poverty
I would like to know your reasoning for deciding that this article is orphaned. I would argue that it is well-linked. Please justify your arguments by linking them to relevant articles of Wikipedia policy. I will be seeking arbitration unless you can convince me that your reasoning is valid. Headshaker 16:31, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
 * This link: which displays all incoming links to the article, clearly shows that there are no incoming links from other articles on Wikipedia. --W.marsh 16:34, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
 * I see. I had thought it was to do with links OUT. Actually there is one inward from credit counseling but I will now link in more relevant articles.

Headshaker 16:48, 29 July 2006 (UTC)

Agropolis: copyright violation?
Thanks for taking on my first try at Wikipedia. I am the owner of the copyright that you suspect is a violation.

I don't know how that effects the rules against publishing original research....this writeup also appears in a book that I co-authored with my wife on the food museums of France.

We have noticed that the subject of food heritage and food-themed museums has not yet been covered by Wikipedia contributors. This is an emerging field of which we are pioneer promoters.

How does an emerging subject get covered....since it is emerging and not well covered, how do those who know about it, like ourselves avoid the Wikipedia rules and still get recognition for worthy subjects such as Agropolis?

Thanks for your time and attention. This world of Wikipedia is amazing....and bewildering to a newbie like me...but I might persevere on behalf of subjects I care about, in the spirit of spreading knowledge,and being a tiny part of this collaborative work of genius.

--Foodmuseumguy 06:00, 30 July 2006 (UTC)Tom Hughes
 * All articles on Wikipedia are released into the GFPL - that is, you agree they can be modified, redistributed and even sold by others. If you indicate you're okay with this, I can take down the copyvio notice. --W.marsh 13:06, 30 July 2006 (UTC)

Yes I am OK with my copyrighted material on "Agropolis" being released into GFPL. Thanks for your help.--Foodmuseumguy 02:02, 31 July 2006 (UTC)Tom Hughes

The Institute of Professional Editors (IPEd)
I am the webmaster for the Institute of Professional Editors (IPEd). You have chosen to label this page as a possible copyright infringement. The page is not a copyright infringement and I request that you remove your objection. The information provided by me within wikipedia is a licensed contribution under the GFDL.

Regards,

Mike Purdy —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mikepurdy (talk • contribs)
 * Well the webpage gives no copyright info that I can find, we assume copyright unless something specifically says otherwise (as is legally sound). Anyway since you've released it, I've taken down the copyvio notice. Thanks. --W.marsh 13:26, 31 July 2006 (UTC)

All Info About.com
I just reinstated the article on allinfoabout.com which you had redirected to the page on About.com. The two networks are completely different with no connection between them at all. They operate differently, About.com pays its Guides and tries to operate to make a profit for shareholders while on Allinfoabout.com Correspondents aren't paid and have much more autonomy and can take 100% of the earnings from all the advertising except the banners at the top of the page. Although AIA is run by 2 people, it works much more like a co-operative.

I just wanted to tell you why I put the article back rather than just doing it with the short explanation. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Cazzee (talk • contribs)

Celebrity Series of Boston
Thanks for your attention to the Celebrity Series of Boston page. I appreciate the concern about the potential use of copyrighted material and am glad you flagged it. Most of the text used for the Celebrity Series page was written by me as a staff member at the Celebrity Series for the organization's web site:, which I edit. The balance was written by my supervisor. My intent is to expand on the history presented with original text as it is written or compiled. Is there something else I should be doing to clarify or is it enough to let you know that I agree to this article's release to the GFPL?

Jack Wright Celebrity Series of Boston, Inc. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Wrightjack (talk • contribs)
 * Yeah, I've gone ahead and taken down the copyvio notice. --W.marsh 17:13, 1 August 2006 (UTC)

Sean Casey Image
What is wrong with the following image?

Similar images are used for most of the MLB player pages including:
 * Iván Rodríguez
 * Magglio Ordóñez
 * Curt Schilling
 * Billy Wagner

I believe the use of this image on Wikipedia is contended to be a fair use, since it is used solely for educational purposes in a not-for-profit encyclopedia, is necessary for cultural and historical purposes, and the material value of the possible copyright is not believed to be lessened by its use here.

The fair use image of Casey as a member of the Cincinnati Reds is out dated and does not show most of his face.

If I uploaded the picture wrong I apologize.-ThatsHowIRoll 22:36, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
 * We try to use free images whenever possible (as people mirror Wikipedia for commercial purposes, among other things), and really should only use fair use ones when there's no free alternative available. I think at the very least both images should be in the article. --W.marsh 22:38, 1 August 2006 (UTC)

Bot's FAQ
On #2 on the FAQ on your bot's page I noticed that you have the link "real liability", and I at least am a little confused: it seems like it's either going to the wrong place or has an ambiguous meaning. GromXXVII 03:54, 3 August 2006 (UTC)GromXXVII
 * John Seigenthaler, Sr. was an orphan article that got Wikipedia a lot of bad press because basically no one had really looked at the article, until the subject of the article did. If there'd been an inbound link from say, John F. Kennedy, the incorrect claims would have probably just been up for a few hours, instead of a few months. If the reference is too confusing feel free to remove it from the bot's page. --W.marsh 03:59, 3 August 2006 (UTC)

User:Ilf01
He's fast, and I don't know if I should mark his creations for speedy delete or not. Thanks. :) Dlohcierekim 18:00, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
 * I'll deal with it... I think I'm going to need to block just to get his/her attention. Thanks for pointing out that they're back, I'd forgotten to check. --W.marsh 18:02, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Thanks for your reply. It was my pleasure.User:Mikereichold | User_talk:Mikereichold 19:09, 3 August 2006 (UTC)

Need protection for Democracy (disambiguation)
We have a situation where one person (BruceHallman) is acting against the strong consensus version of this dab page, by continuing to return the page to a version that the consensus doesn't think is appropriate. Until mediation begins, or for a short period, I request that the page be protected at the consensus version. Thanks! Stevie is the man! Talk &bull; Work 15:32, 5 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Protected... I'll unprotect it before too long. And if a mediator wants to do so earlier I have no problem with that. --W.marsh 17:11, 5 August 2006 (UTC)


 * Thank you. If it could be held until about Tuesday, that would work out pretty well, to see if enough of the parties will sign on to a mediation.  If not, then I guess we'll just see what actually happens with the article before deciding to take further action.  Cheers!  Stevie is the man!  Talk &bull; Work 19:36, 5 August 2006 (UTC)

Reform ideas on your userpage
Good ideas. They require some minor technical work, so I think the next step is to get that done, even if Brion requires more evidence of community consensus for it before they can go live. But in any case, it's a good idea. JesseW, the juggling janitor 16:28, 5 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Thanks. I think the way to go is the proposal BD has up... that's gathering some consensus towards what will work, and what won't. Implimenting the stuff I talk about would probably meet a lot of resistance so proposals like his are the way to go. --W.marsh 16:49, 5 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Link? Who's BD?  User:BD is a redlink... ;-) JesseW, the juggling janitor 16:57, 5 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Oh, I meant User:BD2412. I didn't feel like looking up the numbers after his name and thought you'd know who I meant, hehe. And the proposal is Enforce inclusion of categories. --W.marsh 17:00, 5 August 2006 (UTC)

disambiguation and
Hi, Marshbot recently added to Department of Education and Science. However as it is a disambiguation page, it is supposed to not have any links. Shouldn't Marshbot ignore disambig pages or am I missing something? Aaron McDaid (talk - contribs) 21:18, 5 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Yes, technically to make it a proper disambig page, you need to use one of the tags such as disambig, not merely just add it to the category. I've gone ahead and changed it. I'll see if I can modify the bot to fix this when it counters it... if nothing else it should ignore it from now on. Thanks. --W.marsh 21:20, 5 August 2006 (UTC)

You've got a Thank you card!
  Open your card! Dear W marsh, thank you so much for your beautiful words, your kidness and your trust in me. My Request for Adminship is finally over, and the support and appreciation that the community has gifted me will stick in my mind as long as I live. I have no way to properly express how grateful I am to you for all you've done for me, and all I can tell you is, I'll try not to disappoint you nor anyone else with my use of the buttons... and if I mess up, make sure to come here and give me a good yell! :) Seriously, tho, if you ever need my help, either for admin-related stuff or in any other way, you'll always be welcome to message me, and I promise I'll try my very best. Dear W, this is the perfect opportunity to finally speak to one another after reading your words for months and months. I am sure that we'll be able to talk often, and trust me, it'd be my pleasure. Being supported by a person I look up to, like you, meant the world to me. I sincerely hope this is but the beginning of a friendship, and such thought fills me with joy. Btw, if you really really want, I can cheer up that userpage of yours a little... can I? :) With a big hug, your friend, P h a e d r i e <font color="#009900">l <font color="#FF0000">♥ <font style="color:#22AA00;">tell me 

Your vote on my RfA
Hi W. Marsh! I've responded to your vote on my RfA, you might want to give it a read. Thanks for taking the time to vote! — Mets 501 (talk) 03:27, 8 August 2006 (UTC)

Your vote on my imaginary RfA
Thanks for your support! Unfortunately my faux RfA seems to have crashed 4-3, lack of consensus. Maybe I'll try another fake RfA next month. Oh, I also noticed that you replied to our friend Andy (a.k.a. Karmafist) on Wikipedia Review. Wow, that guy has severe problems with Wikipedia. Rummaged through his gazillion posts about WP on Merrimackforum.org, and the encyclopedia really seems to eat at him. (He literally titled one anti-WP post: "Things gnawing on my brain." A little scary when you think about it.) I kinda hope his talk about getting a sock close to adminship isn't just bizarre fantasy. Of course, if the admin-sock actually exists and he starts using it to post deleted edits on WR, it'll be easy for checkuser to nail it.

Anyway, thanks for enjoying my little joke. Casey Abell 20:10, 8 August 2006 (UTC)

ICP
Hey Marsh, I see you've said that Clarification On The Unsubstantiated Rumors Surrounding The Inter City Posse shouldn't be a stand-alone article, the problem is, if you read the ICP Talk page, you'll see that there are dozens of complaints on how there are several hardcore fan editors who delete anything that they don't like. That's why a seperate article was neccessary. They also protected the page to maintain the article in its current state (the one they made). —Preceding unsigned comment added by YaR GnitS Y (talk • contribs)
 * Well, see WP:NPOV, which covers this kind of stuff clearly, sorry. --W.marsh 18:30, 9 August 2006 (UTC)

clanmatch
Hey,

Just want to know why my page called Clanmatch was deleted? It was not "vanity/advertising" ^^, It's about a historic IRC channel..

/eNgage
 * It seemed self-promotional, since presumable you're involved in it. See WP:WEB for guidelines about including articles related to internet sites, communities and so on. --W.marsh 21:28, 10 August 2006 (UTC)

another exception for Marshbot
Marshbot automatically adds a template to every article that has no incoming links, except for disambiguation pages. However, there is one additional article type that should be skipped. Articles that are waiting to be transwikied. If a template is added to one of these pages, it will probably just need to be removed before the article can be transwikied. Your opinion? -- kenb215 00:04, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Well, it's a bit of a grey area since the transwiki tag just means there's a suggestion that it should be transwiki'd... it's not like the move is set in stone. Still though, it's probably better not to create inbound links until a resolution has been reached (since you might be creating a bunch of links that will soon go to a soft redirect or a redlink, quite possibly). I will think a bit more about this, but I will probably try to have the bot ignore pages with a transwiki tag by the next time it runs. Thanks! --W.marsh 00:08, 13 August 2006 (UTC)

Jason Marquis
I re-added the information about Jason Marquis being Jewish. This isn't just random trivia, he along with Shawn Green have faced controversy over playing baseball (or in Green's case, not playing) on Jewish holy days, which I think is relavent to the WP articles. The other active jewish baseball players... the information is probably not so relevent, I agree. I'll try to add something specific about it to the Marquis article. Thanks. --W.marsh 14:04, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Hi w.marsh, thanks for adding the reference. I would probably prefer to see Green's Jewishness discussed further into the article per WP:MOSBIO but if it really is so noteworthy. It seems that sometimes ethnicity is pushed into articles per agenda driven motives. Anyways, thanks again for making the Marquis article better by sourcing it. Cheers! --Tom 14:13, 13 August 2006 (UTC)

Old Louisville
Ooops... all I can say is... thanks for cleaning up after me in the External links section. Also, big congrats on Old Louisville becoming a Good article. I'm very pleased and excited about that. Cheers! Stevie is the man! Talk &bull; Work 19:14, 14 August 2006 (UTC)

Marshbot
Hey, Marshbot seems to be leaving malformed edits in some places. I've blocked it till it can be fixed. User:Zoe|(talk) 01:37, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Hi... I'm not sure what was wrong exactly... but I have manually fixed all the edits (I think) and have undone the recent changes to the bot settings, so it shouldn't do that again. Should be safe to unblock now... thanks. --W.marsh 01:39, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Hi, did I accidentally block you?! I meant to block the bot!  I am so sorry!  User:Zoe|(talk) 01:49, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
 * It was just an autoblock... despite the trauma of seeing my first "you've been blocked" message ever, it's totally understandable... the bot was going nuts. --W.marsh 01:55, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
 * I'm glad everything's under control. :)  User:Zoe|(talk) 02:27, 15 August 2006 (UTC)

Indeed
But you're the one saying you're rejecting consensus :). Or do you deny stating that you were refusing to negotiate? It's in page history:

Does this mean you're refusing to discuss the topic with me? Technically, based on that diff I should be able to have you blocked for edit-warring, hands down. ;-) Probably not the most diplomatic move though. :-P

In any case, as per Bold revert discuss, could you please explain the reason for your edit?

Kim Bruning 16:15, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Fine, try to get me blocked... this is really lame. Go edit some articles. I am discussing this on both talk pages anyway... so I don't see what I'm doing wrong. --W.marsh 16:19, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Hehe, no, I'm not going to get you blocked, as long as you're acting in good faith. Duh :-)
 * But you made an edit to the policy page where you stated you would refuse to discuss. At the same time you're now saying you're discussing.
 * What I'm doing is holding you individually responsible for your actions, and from that particular viewpoint, there is a big discrepency.
 * Could you please explain where this discrepency stems from? Kim Bruning 16:30, 15 August 2006 (UTC)


 * You're not making much sense to me. I never said I wouldn't discuss. --W.marsh 16:33, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
 * "These three policies are non-negotiable". You did make that edit, right? I'm basically calling you on it. Not to start a fight mind you, but I think people do have to be prepared to explain their reasons for a particular edit. Kim Bruning 16:47, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Belay that, I think we've reached consensus by another path already. If you're still curious what I was getting at in this thread, we can still continue talking for fun, of course. :-) Kim Bruning 16:51, 15 August 2006 (UTC)

Please see
Category:Orphaned_articles_from_June_2006 and Category_talk:Orphaned_articles_from_June_2006    Best regards // <B>Fra</B> nkB  02:12, 16 August 2006 (UTC)

MarshBot
Hi, I just thought I'd notify you about this edit. Something seems to have screwed up somewhere! :) Regards, &mdash; riana_dzasta &bull; t &bull; c &bull; e  &bull; ER &bull; 14:40, 16 August 2006 (UTC)

page Daisy (CMS)
Hello W.marsh,

The page Daisy (CMS) is no longer linkless, can you remove that tag?

Regards,

Poldiri
 * Done --W.marsh 21:06, 16 August 2006 (UTC)

My adminship is now up
Thanks again so much for nominating me. I've accepted and answered the questions. I'm ready for the ride. :) Cheers! Stevie is the man!  Talk &bull; Work 17:02, 17 August 2006 (UTC)