User talk:Retoru

A tag has been placed on your article Grand Admiral Ronin, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be a biographical account about a person, group of people, or band, but it does not indicate how or why he/she/they is/are notable. If you can indicate why Grand Admiral Ronin is really notable, I advise you to edit the article promptly, and also put a note on Talk:Grand Admiral Ronin. Any admin should check for such edits before deleting the article. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Please read our criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 7 under Articles. You might also want to read our general biography criteria. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. To contest the tagging and request that admins should wait a while for you to assert his/her/their notability, please affix the template  to the page, and then immediately add such an assertion. It is also a very good idea to add citations from reliable sources to ensure that your article will be verifiable. ~  Ghelæ  talkcontribs 06:39, 8 April 2006 (UTC)

Image tagging for Image:Jamieh.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Jamieh.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 16:07, 11 May 2007 (UTC)

Welcome
Welcome!

Hello, Retoru, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, your edit to does not conform to Wikipedia's Neutral Point of View policy (NPOV). Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media.

There's a page about the NPOV policy that has tips on how to effectively write about disparate points of view without compromising the NPOV status of the article as a whole. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type   on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Where to ask a question or ask me on. Again, welcome! Erik the Red  2    03:06, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

JESUS
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. Hardyplants (talk) 21:46, 17 October 2008 (UTC)

X-Men
Please link this "official" cast list. Alientraveller (talk) 10:00, 16 April 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Dheak Gill
Please do not make statements attacking people or groups of people. Wikipedia has a strict policy against personal attacks. Attack pages and images are not tolerated by Wikipedia and are speedily deleted. Users who continue to create or repost such pages and images in violation of our biographies of living persons policy will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Thank you.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. TheLetterM (talk) 19:43, 29 April 2009 (UTC)

Because I see past constructive edits in the past, I am reducing the block to one week

 * I've deleted this as an attack page meeting WP:CSD. I see attack page creation as blatant vandalism. Further vandalism may result in you being blocked from editing without further warning. Wikipedia has a strict policy against personal attacks. Attack pages and images are not tolerated by Wikipedia and are speedily deleted. Users who continue to create or repost such pages and images, especially those in violation of our Biographies of living persons policy, will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. I urge you to carefully review Your first article, as well as BLP.


 * If you still have questions, there is a new contributor's help page, or you can write   below this message along with a question and someone will be along to answer it shortly.
 * You would do well to familiarize yourself with the following pages for a general introduction to Wikipedia.
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style
 * Policy on neutral point of view
 * Guideline on external links
 * Guideline on conflict of interest


 * If you wish to make test edits to Wikipedia's syntax that do not involve disparagement, harassment, or threats, please use the sandbox. Thank you,  Dloh  cierekim  21:28, 29 April 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Dheak Gill


Please do not make statements attacking people or groups of people. Wikipedia has a strict policy against personal attacks. Attack pages and images are not tolerated by Wikipedia and are speedily deleted. Users who continue to create or repost such pages and images in violation of our biographies of living persons policy will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Thank you.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Kevin (talk) 04:47, 5 May 2011 (UTC)

Adding deleted names to articles

 * [[Image:Stop hand nuvola.svg|30px|alt=|link=]] This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. OhNo itsJamie  Talk 02:23, 21 September 2012 (UTC)

And, what exactly did I vandalize, Mr Ohnoitshamie, wannabe Lord Protector of Wikipedia?

May 2011
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Regulate (song). Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted or removed. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive; until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. a_man_alone (talk) 10:38, 5 May 2011 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor then please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Regulate (song)
Hello. If you feel that the Regulate (song) article should have that particular lyric synopsis then please discuss it on the talk page before reverting. As per WP:BRD someone boldly added that content, I reverted, and now the next step is to discuss it. If you have any questions or comments you can reach me on my talk page. Thanks. SQGibbon (talk) 17:29, 13 December 2013 (UTC)

You were already given a final warning for this
You have been blocked from editing Wikipedia  as a result of your . You are free to make constructive edits after the block has expired, but please note that vandalism (including page blanking or addition of random text), spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, personal attacks; and repeated, blatant violations of our policies concerning neutral point of view and biographies of living persons will not be tolerated. OhNo itsJamie Talk 20:42, 13 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Preemptive note to block reviewer; this user was warned before about posting silly rap synposes and though he has a few marginally constructive edits, I don't think he is here to build an encyclopedia. OhNo itsJamie Talk 21:20, 13 December 2013 (UTC)

Orly?
Oh yeah? Each thing you linked that added is 100% true. Jesus and the bible are Christian mythology, Vincent Margera is a sex offender, Dheak Gill did win the Iron Stomach competition(I live in Flatwoods, trust me), pimping isn't easy(ask any pimp), and Wu-Tang is nuthin' to fuck wit(listen to any song they recorded, they say it in all of them). Fact of the matter is that user:Ohnoitsjamie is just a silly little man who is most likely an ineffectual little nothing in real life, so he has to lord his powers on Wikipedia. Fact is, the things I've posted have always been 100% true, verifiable, and a positive contribution to Wikipedia. Get the stick out of your ass and stop taking yourself so seriously, you're a sad little man, not a god. Retoru (talk) 01:29, 14 December 2013 (UTC)

There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. OhNo itsJamie Talk 01:38, 14 December 2013 (UTC)

Oh noes! You're gonna ban me from editing permanently simply because you don't like me posting FACTS on Wikipedia. It's no wonder the entire world doesn't take Wikipedia seriously, you are subject to being banned when you put FACTS on the site. Maybe I should have written another glowing review of Hulk Hogan's mustache(yes, that exists on a page on this site) instead of trying to actually create content of value(minus the Warren G thing). Just as I thought, you're a sad little man. You prove it by taking something posted on a website personally and using your "power" to attempt to silence my voice. Overzealous admins like you who like to swing the ban hammer to liberally and too quickly are the reason why this site has been on a downhill slide for years. Just so you know, if you do permban me from Wikipedia I will wear it as a badge of honor, it's hardly going to be the crushing blow you think it will be. Retoru (talk) 01:47, 14 December 2013 (UTC)

Creating a sock to vandalize
You have been indefinitely blocked from editing Wikipedia as a result of your . Vandalism (including page blanking or addition of random text), spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, personal attacks; and repeated, blatant violations of our neutral point of view policy will not be tolerated. OhNo itsJamie Talk 22:12, 4 March 2014 (UTC)

Too bad you're wrong, isn't it? I didn't create any additional accounts, I haven't even logged into Wikipedia in months. Nice to see that some things don't change and that you still have a bug up your butt and no life. The fact is that if I wanted to I could create thousands of accounts on thousands of IPs and do what I wanted, but I have no desire to do that or to cause any trouble. You're still butthurt that I don't "respect" your "power" on Wikipedia and have made you feel like an ineffective little dork in the one thing you focus your time on. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.17.232.74 (talk) 18:51, 5 July 2014 (UTC)