User talk:Reuben1995

August 2016
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for Blatant abuse of Wikipedia processes (AfC). If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 05:23, 13 August 2016 (UTC)


 * Whether it is in the rules specifically or not, I would have thought that it was obvious that the whole point of having a review procedure was to get things reviewed independently. Peridon (talk) 10:47, 13 August 2016 (UTC)
 * I understand this now, but if you are going to tell me to make sure I read and understand something, atleast make sure to include "do not accept your own articles, they have to be reviewed independently" if I would at least seen this in the guidelines, I wouldn't have did such a thing, and blocking me indefinit for one mistake and no warning is not fair.Reuben 13:04, 13 August 2016 (UTC)
 * You made 500 blank edits to gain access to the review mechanism because you knew full well that the article you created would not be accepted by the community. The two other reasons for your blck are 'creating inappropriate articles', and [that you are not here to build an encyclopedia. There are probably a few more too, but that will do for now. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 07:01, 14 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Hmm. I thought there must be more to the block than just self-accepting.... Peridon (talk) 18:22, 14 August 2016 (UTC)
 * I made edits to my article. They where not blank edits, they were edits of me fixing the article. 2. I did not create inappropriate articles, I made 2 articles of the same person different information, then I combined them together, and then I created an article for a company. And I only accepted one article, if I was abusing the process I would of just accepted all of my articles, which I could have easily done, but that's not what I am here to do. Reuben 19:00, 14 August 2016 (UTC)
 * I have learned my lesson about doing such thing, and I will never repeat those same mistakes again. Also, There is no reason to salt the article either because Trizzy will meet Wikipedia's criteria sooner then you think. it is not his fault for what I did. I take full responsibility for my actions.Reuben 19:04, 14 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Note that you spammed in that article just to get edit count so that you can participate the WP:AfC WikiProject. You had made about 350 edits under a day. I don't really think a draft article doesn't need much edit. And spamming about 50 a won't help. NgYShung  huh? 10:59, 15 August 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Ruby Recordings


A tag has been placed on Draft:Ruby Recordings, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. Legacypac (talk) 06:19, 18 March 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:TrizzyBeats.png


The file File:TrizzyBeats.png has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Personal image / non-notable person, unused"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. 1989 (talk) 19:11, 26 July 2019 (UTC)