User talk:RevRichardBlue

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Lutheran Orthodox Church (September 3)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:The Lutheran Orthodox Church and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:The_Lutheran_Orthodox_Church Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Theroadislong&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:The_Lutheran_Orthodox_Church reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 17:58, 3 September 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:The Lutheran Orthodox Church


A tag has been placed on Draft:The Lutheran Orthodox Church requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://lutheranorthodoxchurch.org/our-rule-(aka-%27who-we-are%27). For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Theroadislong (talk) 17:58, 3 September 2022 (UTC)


 * @Theroadislong I now have been blocked how ridiculous!!! When it comes to submitting information regarding a denomination one simply cannot rephrase items in their own words this would change accurate data. 68.50.187.95 (talk) 18:25, 3 September 2022 (UTC)
 * @68.50.187.95 likewise why would I be marked as spam! I am a real person and am connected to the denomination I am submitting. 68.50.187.95 (talk) 18:27, 3 September 2022 (UTC)
 * You say "When it comes to submitting information regarding a denomination one simply cannot rephrase items" Yes you can... and indeed it is imperative that you do so, Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously as you have discovered. Theroadislong (talk) 22:23, 3 September 2022 (UTC)
 * I am now the official person in charge of Tech including its website so how do I resolve this so I can submit the information? RevRichardBlue (talk) 00:21, 28 September 2022 (UTC)