User talk:Revelation911

Talk pages and edit warring
When people disagree with your edits enough to revert them, don't just keep putting them back. This is called edit warring and it can get you blocked. When there's disagreement, make your case on the talk page. If others don't agree, you just have to accept that you won't always get your way. Friday (talk) 18:49, 9 July 2008 (UTC)

Likewise, that works both ways friend. Revelation911 (talk) 22:41, 9 July 2008 (UTC)


 * Not necessarily. Wikipedia works through consensus, and so far the consensus has been that the edits you attempted to add were unnecessary. You've been reverted by multiple people with varied editing histories, which is a sure sign you need to take a look at why. -- Good Damon 23:41, 9 July 2008 (UTC)

"which is a sure sign you need to take a look at why."

That is a cheap shot, and bush league.... I was expecting more professional interactions, but, consistent with the webs attitude towards the use of wikipedia as a reliable source, my experiences are now confirming that to be accurate.Revelation911 (talk) 01:59, 10 July 2008 (UTC)


 * I have gone out of my way to explain Wikipedia policies, and which ones you were violating, as well as the logical reasons why an article's lead shouldn't be stuffed with point-of-view pushing cruft, and I've tried to assume good faith (an official Wikipedia policy) of you, but with comments like that you're making it very hard. Tell you what... Read the policies I've linked to (and while you're at it, read WP:LEAD, part of the style guide), and let us know what you think. Until then, I can only suggest that you avoid editing in articles where you have an obvious conflict of interest. -- Good Damon 05:27, 10 July 2008 (UTC)

will do, but the comment remains unprofessional and editorial on your partRevelation911 (talk) 16:42, 10 July 2008 (UTC)