User talk:Revelationman

images
Images with your, or any, website URL in them are inappropriate for wikipedia. Please stop adding them to articles.Farsight001 (talk) 20:46, 26 May 2010 (UTC)

May 2010
Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia, as you did to Number of the Beast. While it is acceptable to provide artwork for the Wikipedia project, Wikipedia is not intended to be a vehicle for advertising or promotion, and images should not be watermarked. Thank you. McGeddon (talk) 10:14, 27 May 2010 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did to Abomination of Desolation, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. The image is a particular interpretation, and Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a blog for exegesis. If the image corresponded to a sourced description of some notable belief, then it might be allowed. Ian.thomson (talk) 16:41, 28 May 2010 (UTC)

This is the final warning you will receive regarding your disruptive edits. The next time you violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by inserting commentary or your personal analysis into an article, as you did to Abomination of Desolation, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. What part of "unsourced interpretation" not being allowed don't you get? Ian.thomson (talk) 15:52, 29 May 2010 (UTC)

You are suspected of sockpuppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the notes for the suspect, then respond to the evidence at Sockpuppet investigations/Johnreve. Thank you. Ian.thomson (talk) 16:54, 28 May 2010 (UTC) Icestorm815 •  Talk  17:39, 16 June 2010 (UTC)