User talk:Reverendsquirrel

Welcome!

 * }

January 2014
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Kenneth Copeland has been reverted. Your edit here to Kenneth Copeland was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (http://m.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLeA8Rw6nJnwNADCyZoaGsv9_t0aRpuva4) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a media file (e.g. a sound or video file) on an external server, then note that linking to such files may be subject to Wikipedia's copyright policy, as well as other parts of our external links guideline. If the information you linked to is indeed in violation of copyright, then such information should not be linked to. Please consider using our upload facility to upload a suitable media file, or consider linking to the original. If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 18:08, 6 January 2014 (UTC)


 * Hi Reverendsquirrel, and welcome to Wikipedia. I saw the edit you made to Kenneth Copeland and had to revert it because it doesn't conform with our biographies of living persons policy. BLPs are taken very seriously on Wikipedia due to their nature. For controversial material, such as the information you introduced, reliable sources are absolutely mandatory. Also, there is a fair ammount of criticism in the article at present, so care should be given to prevent giving undue weight to one side or the other. If you have any questions, please feel free to drop me a line on my talk page.  Ish dar  ian  04:17, 7 January 2014 (UTC)