User talk:Reverkd'19

Nomination of EnergySage for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article EnergySage is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/EnergySage until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.  DGG ( talk ) 02:00, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
 * I will continue to use the sandbox instead now. I apologize for the inconvenience. Reverkd&#39;19 (talk) 21:33, 10 September 2016 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:PeetsCoffee-test.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:PeetsCoffee-test.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:45, 5 August 2018 (UTC)