User talk:ReverseLevity

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rolls-Royce Phantom VIII (July 28)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Kees08 was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Rolls-Royce Phantom VIII and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the or on the.
 * You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

 Kees08  (Talk)   01:27, 28 July 2017 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rolls-Royce Phantom VIII has been accepted
 Rolls-Royce Phantom VIII, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. . Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!  Kees08  (Talk)   22:48, 29 July 2017 (UTC)
 * If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  .
 * If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Duplicate?
Hi, I see that your AFC (Rolls-Royce Phantom VIII) submission has been accepted. Isn't this a duplicate of the already created Rolls-Royce Phantom (2017)? If so, shouldn't they be merged (as in one redirects to the other) to keep a single page for the one car? Pinging as the AFC reviewer and involved contributor for comment. —72 talk 22:56, 29 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Looks like it. ReverseLevity's was made much earlier, and conforms to the naming convention for the majority of the Phantom articles. I would recommend a rename of Rolls-Royce Phantom (2003) to Rolls-Royce Phantom VII, and I would recommend Rolls-Royce Phantom (2017) be merged into Rolls-Royce Phantom VIII. My mistake for not noticing that page, the Rolls-Royce Phantom VIII article that existed was a redirect to Rolls-Royce Phantom, and I did not think to click on the link in that list. As an aside, I do not particularly care all that much what gets merged where, just thought I would offer a couple suggestions since this was my fault.  Kees08  (Talk)   23:05, 29 July 2017 (UTC)
 * The articles appear to both be the same apart from the categories and the  templates on Rolls-Royce Phantom (2017). I think that the Rolls-Royce Phantom (2003) article was named in such a way because the car isn't primarily marketed with the roman numerals at the end (at least since BMW group took over). I would prefer to see it continued down that line if that is the case, but I am reluctant to redirect without comment from ReverseLevity. Thanks, —72 talk 23:21, 29 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Hi, I hope this response is formatted correctly. Sorry for having caused confusion by re-submitting ".. Phantom VIII" and then editing "... Phantom (2017). I believe the best way of naming the articles is with roman numerals, model years aren't universal and can cause a fair bit of confusion. The BMW Group R-R still uses the roman numerals to refer to former/current Phantoms as seen here. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ReverseLevity (talk • contribs) 18:05, 4 August 2017 (UTC)

Edit War : 4 October 2017
Your recent editing history at Rolls-Royce Phantom shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Pavlos2211 (talk • contribs) 13:52, 4 October 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Rolls-Royce Phantom (2018)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Rolls-Royce Phantom (2018) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Ral 33 -- Ral 33 (talk) 05:01, 19 January 2018 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Rolls-Royce Phantom (2018)
The article Rolls-Royce Phantom (2018) you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Rolls-Royce Phantom (2018) for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Ral 33 -- Ral 33 (talk) 17:21, 19 January 2018 (UTC)

Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global survey
Hello! The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey. We want to know how well we are supporting your work on and off wiki, and how we can change or improve things in the future. The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation. You have been randomly selected to take this survey as we would like to hear from your Wikimedia community. The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes. Take the survey now!

You can find more information about this survey on the project page and see how your feedback helps the Wikimedia Foundation support editors like you. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement (in English). Please visit our frequently asked questions page to find more information about this survey. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email through the EmailUser feature to WMF Surveys to remove you from the list.

Thank you! WMF Surveys, 18:25, 29 March 2018 (UTC)

Reminder: Share your feedback in this Wikimedia survey
Every response for this survey can help the Wikimedia Foundation improve your experience on the Wikimedia projects. So far, we have heard from just 29% of Wikimedia contributors. The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes to be completed. Take the survey now.

If you have already taken the survey, we are sorry you've received this reminder. We have design the survey to make it impossible to identify which users have taken the survey, so we have to send reminders to everyone. If you wish to opt-out of the next reminder or any other survey, send an email through EmailUser feature to WMF Surveys. You can also send any questions you have to this user email. Learn more about this survey on the project page. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this Wikimedia Foundation privacy statement. Thanks! WMF Surveys, 01:23, 13 April 2018 (UTC)

Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey
Hello! This is a final reminder that the Wikimedia Foundation survey will close on 23 April, 2018 (07:00 UTC). The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes. Take the survey now.

'''If you already took the survey - thank you! We will not bother you again.''' We have designed the survey to make it impossible to identify which users have taken the survey, so we have to send reminders to everyone. To opt-out of future surveys, send an email through EmailUser feature to WMF Surveys. You can also send any questions you have to this user email. Learn more about this survey on the project page. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this Wikimedia Foundation privacy statement. WMF Surveys, 00:32, 20 April 2018 (UTC)