User talk:Reviewing Footballers

Welcome!
Hello, Wasimborah781008, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Rohan Prasad, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's content policies and may not be retained. In short, the topic of an article must be notable and have already been the subject of publication by reliable and independent sources.

Please review Your first article for an overview of the article creation process. The Article Wizard is available to help you create an article, where it will be reviewed and considered for publication. For information on how to request a new article that can be created by someone else, see Requested articles. If you are stuck, come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can help you through the processes.

New to Wikipedia? Please consider taking a look at our introductory tutorial or reviewing the contributing to Wikipedia page to learn the basics about editing. Below are a few other good pages about article creation.
 * Article development
 * Standard layout
 * Lead section
 * The perfect article
 * Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, ask me on my talk page or you can just type help me on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Cabayi (talk) 09:16, 17 January 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Rohan Prasad


A tag has been placed on Rohan Prasad requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. Cabayi (talk) 09:16, 17 January 2022 (UTC)

January 2022
Hello, I noticed that you may have recently made edits to Rohan Prasad while logged out. Wikipedia's policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow the use of both an account and an IP address by the same person in the same setting and doing so may result in your account being blocked from editing. Additionally, making edits while logged out reveals your IP address, which may allow others to determine your location and identity. If this was not your intention, please remember to log in when editing. Special:Permalink/1066215132 Cabayi (talk) 13:41, 17 January 2022 (UTC)

Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages, as you did with Rohan Prasad. Doing so won't stop the discussion from taking place. You are, however, welcome to comment about the proposed deletion on the appropriate page. Thank you. Mvqr (talk) 15:22, 17 January 2022 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove an Articles for deletion notice or a comment from an AfD discussion, as you did at Rohan Prasad. Mvqr (talk) 15:26, 17 January 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Rohan Prasad for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rohan Prasad is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Rohan Prasad until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Cabayi (talk) 13:54, 17 January 2022 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. Constructive contributions are appreciated, but, in this edit to Rohan Prasad, you removed Articles for deletion notices from articles or removed other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates. This makes it difficult to establish consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. I dream of horses (Contribs) (Talk) 14:07, 17 January 2022 (UTC)

I Request Not to delete the Article Rohan Prasad he is an indian Football.You can search the Wikipedia pages of the clubs in the player section You can see his name in the player list Reviewing Footballers (talk) 08:22, 18 January 2022 (UTC)


 * You can make that point at the deletion discussion once your block has expired later today. You should note that it's not a good point to make - Wikipedia is not a reliable source. The article's sources need to be reliable, verifiable, and independent. Cabayi (talk) 11:11, 18 January 2022 (UTC)

Discussion at ANI
There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Mvqr (talk) 15:29, 17 January 2022 (UTC)

 You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31h for disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. User:Ymblanter (talk) 17:12, 17 January 2022 (UTC)

Blocked for sockpuppetry
 You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abusing multiple accounts&#32;per the evidence presented at Sockpuppet investigations/Reviewing Footballers. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Sir Sputnik (talk) 16:19, 18 January 2022 (UTC)

Blocked for sockpuppetry
 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts&#32;per the evidence presented at Sockpuppet investigations/Reviewing Footballers. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Cabayi (talk) 09:50, 19 January 2022 (UTC)

Requesting Unblock
I admit that I created Many Account for editing wikipedia but i promise You that i will not Create any new acc and i will edit wikipedia only with this acc and i will only create article about notable and Verifiable athletes.So please give me one second Chance i promise i won't repeat This Mistake Again. Reviewing Footballers (talk) 18:08, 16 February 2022 (UTC)

is declined. ✅ sockpuppetry and user did not follow the clear instructions to wait six months since the last violation. They have been advised to wait until 2023-11-11 or one year after the last violation of WP:SOCK and WP:EVADE, whichever comes later. -- Yamla (talk) 10:34, 11 November 2022 (UTC)