User talk:Revolcyan

Spears conservatorship
Your draft article is very good and I encourage you to proceed with getting it into mainspace. Cheers, Coretheapple (talk) 20:34, 10 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Thanks! I plan to submit it for review in the next day or two. Indecisjon (talk) 20:56, 10 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Good. Personally I just go ahead and put articles in mainspace, but getting feedback in AfC is a good idea too. Coretheapple (talk) 23:51, 10 July 2021 (UTC)

Stubs and categories, and navigation
Hallo, re this edit: please note that: Please also note that when you create an article at a disambiguated title you need to make sure that the reader can find it from the basic title - I've expanded the hatnote at BMO Tower to link to this one.
 * 1) Stub categories must not be added directly but only by adding a stub template, which also generates a stub notice on the article
 * 2) Rather than Category:Chicago and Category:Buildings and structures there is a specific category Category:Skyscraper office buildings in Chicago. It's worth looking around the category tree to find a precise category.

Thanks and Happy Editing. Pam D  06:34, 12 July 2021 (UTC)

NYT information in 2014 on Spears' conservatorship
Thank you for creating the Britney Spears conservatorship Wikipedia page. I wanted to create it in 2019, but it was branded conspiracy by other editors and I felt I did not have enough support. I was the first person on Wikipedia to add the 2019 section of Spears' conservatorship dispute, and I faced criticism for 'biased information' in support of it. As a result, I believe any edit I make regarding the conservatorship will be disputed.

However, I want to ask if you could check out and add any additional information from the years 2014 and 2016, where Spears wanted to end the conservatorship then. It is all listed in the NY Times article one day prior to her June 23 hearing, which is a credible source. Also, the alleged Jonathan Ross conservatorship conversation being cut would be worthy to note.

This is the article. Have a good day and thanks for your contribution! https://www.nytimes.com/2021/06/22/arts/music/britney-spears-conservatorship.html --Thelonggoneblues (talk) 13:47, 16 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Thanks! I have been working on the page for a while now. I too was concerned about whether the material in my contributions would be considered "conspiracy", but it seems that since Spears has spoken herself, that has become less of a concern. It is especially interesting to see details considered "biased" two years ago, being discussed as fact in credible sources today like The New York Times, among others. It is also interesting to see how many of the #FreeBritney movement's suspicions have been "validated", as a number of sources have stated, in recent weeks.


 * I will certainly look into 2014-2016 details in that NYT article, and same with the alleged Jonathan Ross discussion about the conservatorship. As long as I can find good sources for those details, they should be added to the page very soon. Indecisjon (talk) 19:42, 16 July 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Sam Asghari
Hello, Indecisjon. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Sam Asghari, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 06:02, 20 February 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:43, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:58, 28 November 2023 (UTC)