User talk:Revolutionary

Please see my comments on Talk:Romanian Revolution of 1989. I don't want to bite your head off, but I think you need a lesson on the nature of copyright law. -- Jmabel 09:56, Oct 9, 2004 (UTC)

Copyright issues
Revolutionary, the rules of Wikipedia state that you may not submit material for which you do not own the copyright. You can only submit material if: Furthermore, anything that you create and then submit is GFDLed, which means you no longer own exclusive copyright. This assertion on your user page is redundant -- by contributing, you are automatically giving permission to everyone and anyone to mercilessly edit your submissions.
 * 1) You created it,
 * 2) The material is public domain, or
 * 3) Wikipedia has written permission from whoever created it.

There is a more thorough (and authoritative) description of the rules at Copyrights. More things to read: Tutorial, NPOV tutorial (POV and NPOV discussed), and Image_use_policy.

I am writing this because I saw your post to Main Page. While the tip was in good faith, it is not a good way to acquire images for Wikipedia (most of them are not free for the taking).

I do appreciate the work you do on Wikipedia, and I hope that you will continue to contribute. I just want to make sure that you are aware of the policies. -- Tim McCormack 19:47, 2004 Oct 22 (UTC)


 * I came by to drop you a message for other reasons, then saw this. Have you by now either read and been able to understand the materials about copyright or found someone to explain them to you? (By the way, it's usually considered somewhat poor form to remove comments from your discussion page without archiving and linking.) -- Jmabel | Talk 18:43, Oct 25, 2004 (UTC)


 * Apparently, you still don't understand. Revolutionary, I just saw the way you added an entire article from Encyclopaedia Britannica to the Apartheid article, here on Wikipedia. While the content is surely valid, there are rules that prevent users from adding that kind of content here, because it's copyrighted. That means that information is protected by law. It is considered intellectual property of whoever created it, and for that reason, you can't add it here. What you can do, however, is to read all that, create your own understanding of the text (interpreting it), and then add to the Apartheid article all the things you feel that could be good contributions to the page. That you can do. It's also a good idea to cite your information sources, when it's clear that you're basing yourself on somebody else's work.


 * Please, don't ignore the things we're writing on your talk page. We're just trying to help you. To make you understand the way things work on Wikipedia. I promise that, once you learn it, you'll see things can be quite enjoyable here. Think carefully.--Kaonashi 00:18, 31 Dec 2004 (UTC)

1989
...But what I really came to drop you a note about is that since you obviously have pretty good access to sources about December 1989 and a strong interest in the subject, you might want to look at the recent edits to History of Romania since 1989 and expecially the recent discussion at Talk:History of Romania since 1989. You may have more specifics to contribute than I do. -- Jmabel | Talk 18:43, Oct 25, 2004 (UTC)

copyrights again
Glad to hear we are (at least potentially) covered; please see my question to you at Talk:Romanian Revolution of 1989. -- Jmabel | Talk 04:55, Nov 1, 2004 (UTC)

Song lyrics and copyright
Lyrics to songs such as Another Brick in the Wall are under copyright and cannot be posted to Wikipedia. -- Cyrius|✎ 16:15, 1 Dec 2004 (UTC)

Ole, Revolutionary
Ce zici să dai o raită şi pe la ro.wiki, să-ţi creezi şi acolo un utilizator şi să contribui? Te aşteptăm cu mare drag, şi bine ai venit în echipa Wikipedia! Dacă deja lucrezi la ro.wiki însă pe o adresă necunoscută, te invit să-ţi faci un cont de utilizator. --Danutz

Copyrights once more
Large chunks of text in Occupied Japan and Post-Occupation Japan lifted straight from Britannica Online. Please don't; see the numerous comments from others on this talk page, and also the big warning at the bottom of every edit page:


 * DO NOT SUBMIT COPYRIGHTED WORK WITHOUT PERMISSION!

-- JTN 23:47, 2005 Mar 20 (UTC)

Image:Stevie.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Stevie.jpg, has been listed at. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in its not being deleted. Thank you. —MetsBot 18:55, 9 December 2006 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:Jhonen Vasquez IPEX 2002.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Jhonen Vasquez IPEX 2002.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the image, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created the image yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the image on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the image yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the image also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture then you can use GFDL to release it under the GFDL. If you can claim fair use use or fairuse. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other images, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of image pages you have edited by going to "Your contributions" from your user page and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thanks so much. --Agnte 20:11, 4 December 2005 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Fred_Gallagher_(with_Sarah).jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Fred_Gallagher_(with_Sarah).jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images on Wikipedia is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this:.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. You can get help on image copyright tagging from Wikipedia talk:Image copyright tags. -- Carnildo 07:26, 31 January 2006 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Liam_Lynch.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Liam_Lynch.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images on Wikipedia is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this:.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. You can get help on image copyright tagging from Wikipedia talk:Image copyright tags. -- Carnildo 10:34, 1 February 2006 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:Protestatar înarmat încearcÄƒ sÄƒ-i apere pe cei din jur de forÅ£ele de represiune, TimiÅŸoara.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Protestatar înarmat încearcÄƒ sÄƒ-i apere pe cei din jur de forÅ£ele de represiune, TimiÅŸoara.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use GFDL to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, please read fair use, and then use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- Longhair 13:56, 1 February 2006 (UTC)

Propaganda Due
Hi! You may want to have a look at Propaganda Due and especially at reference. Any translation or bits of translation in a "Ceaucescu & Propaganda Due" subsection would be welcome. Santa Sangre

Image copyright problem with Image:Rodney_Caston.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Rodney_Caston.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images on Wikipedia is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this:.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. You can get help on image copyright tagging from Wikipedia talk:Image copyright tags. -- Carnildo 04:28, 2 February 2006 (UTC)

Revolutionary's response: I don't know the license... and I have no idea how copyright works... Just... delete that picture if it violates anything before it causes some hassle. I don't know why I keep myself on this site if I have no idea how copyright works. I don't want to go through something like the beginning again.

Image Tagging Image:Liam Lynch.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Liam Lynch.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use GFDL-self to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, please read fair use, and then use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you.  Soothing R  11:29, 24 February 2006 (UTC)

Image Tagging for Image:Félix_Houphouët-Boigny.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Félix_Houphouët-Boigny.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see User talk:Carnildo/images. 09:14, 11 March 2006 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:Ciocnire între armatÄƒ ÅŸi protestanÅ£i pe strÄƒzile Capitalei.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Ciocnire între armatÄƒ ÅŸi protestanÅ£i pe strÄƒzile Capitalei.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use GFDL-self to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, please read fair use, and then use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. - SCEhard T 04:50, 16 March 2006 (UTC)

Fred Gallagher's age
Hi Revolutionary, last October you added Fred Gallagher's year of birth to the article. What's your source for this? All I have is a rant, from which I concluded he was born either 1968 or 1969. Thanks, da Pete (ノート) 09:14, 23 April 2006 (UTC)

License tagging for Image:Wes Nookie video.JPG
Thanks for uploading Image:Wes Nookie video.JPG. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Media copyright questions. 17:10, 12 November 2006 (UTC)

Image tagging for Image:Suharto_resigns.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Suharto_resigns.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 10:33, 6 January 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Bill.JPG)
Thanks for uploading Image:Bill.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. MER-C 12:36, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Joel_mst3k.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Joel_mst3k.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Videmus Omnia 19:38, 16 June 2007 (UTC)

Image:Tis.jpg
I have tagged Image:Tis.jpg as no rationale, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. Thank you. Videmus Omnia Talk  22:17, 2 August 2007 (UTC)

Notability of Andrzej Benesz
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Andrzej Benesz, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Andrzej Benesz seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Andrzej Benesz, please affix the template to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that '''this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here''' CSDWarnBot (talk) 20:00, 28 December 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:HappinessSlaveryVideo.JPG
Thanks for uploading Image:HappinessSlaveryVideo.JPG. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 23:12, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

File:Tank during 17 November 1973.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Tank during 17 November 1973.jpg, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Damiens .rf 17:17, 11 December 2009 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:52, 23 November 2015 (UTC)