User talk:Revolutionaryspirits

If you have a close connection to some of the people, places or things you have written about, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred from the tone of the edit and the proximity of the editor to the subject, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:
 * 1) editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
 * 2) participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors;
 * 3) linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Spam); and,
 * 4) avoid breaching relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for businesses. For more details about what, exactly, constitutes a conflict of interest, please see our conflict of interest guidelines. Given your user name and the book title you are putting into articles, you may have a conflict of interest. Ruhrfisch &gt;&lt;&gt; &deg; &deg; 02:42, 14 March 2009 (UTC)

Joseph Priestley
Thanks for your recent contributions to the Joseph Priestley article! I just wanted to let you know that the reason I removed the information is because it is primarily about Jefferson. Fascinating as it is, we can't include every detail about Priestley's life in the article or it would wind on too long (it probably already is too long!). Perhaps you could add some of what you know to the Thomas Jefferson article? Awadewit (talk) 02:53, 14 March 2009 (UTC)
 * I see in your most recent edit summary to the Priestley article that you state "A recent Priestley biography, The Invention of Air, called JP "the forgotten founder," so delineating his close relationship and philosophical kinship to the Declaration's author seems in order" - that is a good point (this article was written before the publication of that book). I wonder, however, what the best way to do this is. We already have some material about Jefferson and Priestley's relationship in the article. Rather than just adding to that paragraph, I wonder if it would be better to rewrite it altogether. Would you be willing to help us do that? Awadewit (talk) 13:24, 14 March 2009 (UTC)

3RR
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. Ruhrfisch &gt;&lt;&gt; &deg; &deg; 04:35, 14 March 2009 (UTC)

I blocked you briefly for violatiing WP:3RR, but have unblocked you at User:Awadewit's request and becasue you are new here and may not realize the seriousness of 3RR violations. Please discuss changes before making them - Awadewit is a joy to work with and I look forward to an even better Joseph Priestley article. Ruhrfisch &gt;&lt;&gt; &deg; &deg; 13:45, 14 March 2009 (UTC)

Hi, I am brand new to Wikipedia, so I didn't intend to break any rules. Sorry. I'm just figuring out how the technology works. I thought that highlighting Priestley's associations with prominent founding fathers was of interest, given the new bio "The Invention of Air" that calls JP a forgotten founder. I realize that my edits were inserted into a paragraph about Priestley's pedagogical contributions to the U.of Virginia, but thought some more Jefferson connections would be of interest to readers. If you'll please unblock me, I'll be happy to cooperate with your suggestions. I would like to make some amplifications to the piece on John Adams, especially the section on religion.


 * I unblocked this account, so your IP address should also be unblocked. If it is not, you can still edit here, so please leave a note and I will make sure the IP address is also unblocked. Ruhrfisch &gt;&lt;&gt; &deg; &deg; 14:26, 14 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Thanks for your willingness to help. What do you think about rewriting the entire paragraph about Jefferson and Priestley? We could do that at Talk:Joseph Priestley. Awadewit (talk) 14:12, 14 March 2009 (UTC)

I think an improved section would highlight Priestley's friendship with other revolutionary founders like Adams as well as Jefferson. By the way, I'm still blocked from editing.


 * I was away from my computer for several hours, sorry. I cannot see the problem - this account is unblocked, but I suspect your IP address is autoblocked. Anyway, I have asked another admin to look at this and see if they can unblock you. Sorry, Ruhrfisch &gt;&lt;&gt; &deg; &deg; 03:57, 15 March 2009 (UTC)
 * There was an IP autoblock, but it has been lifted now. Sorry for the inconvenience, Ruhrfisch &gt;&lt;&gt; &deg; &deg; 04:07, 15 March 2009 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Professor Jeannette Haviland-Jones (August 16)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CASSIOPEIA was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Professor Jeannette Haviland-Jones and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Professor Jeannette Haviland-Jones, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "db-self" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Professor_Jeannette_Haviland-Jones Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:CASSIOPEIA&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Professor_Jeannette_Haviland-Jones reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

 CASSIOPEIA(talk) 11:20, 16 August 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Professor Jeannette Haviland-Jones concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Professor Jeannette Haviland-Jones, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:35, 17 January 2020 (UTC)

Draft:Jeannette Haviland-Jones concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Jeannette Haviland-Jones, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:24, 8 July 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Jeannette Haviland-Jones


Hello, Revolutionaryspirits. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Jeannette Haviland-Jones".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the, , or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 01:59, 14 January 2021 (UTC)