User talk:Revolving Bugbear/Archive 8

Re: Trigun
I will be the first to admit that I know nothing about anime, so all I can go by is the article. This seems to very clearly indicate that it is a sci-fi western, and not a "space" western, per se. Of course, as you say, there is no reason, necessarily, that it cannot be both. I will defer to your knowledge and opinion on this matter, though. Do what you think is best. --- RepublicanJacobite The'FortyFive'  22:53, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
 * No, no, I did not think you were second-guessing me. I simply wanted to admit that I know so little about anime that I know I could be wrong.  And you are correct that it keeps popping up on the list, time and again, and being removed.  From everything that I can see, it would seem to fall into the sci-fi western category much better than space western.  The article says "space western" and "sci-fi western," but I think that is more a result of someone misunderstanding the meaning.  I really do not see it as a space western.  Cheers! --- RepublicanJacobite  The'FortyFive'  00:50, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
 * I wanted to let you know that I started a discussion over at Talk:Space Western about Trigun, so that we can finally have the matter settled. --- RepublicanJacobite The'FortyFive'  15:55, 24 January 2008 (UTC)

User:King of Games 363.
See here. · AndonicO  Hail!  01:31, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Fair enough; I've reduced the block to a week (as of now). · AndonicO  Hail!  17:36, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Okay. I'll come by in a week as well. · AndonicO  Hail!  17:41, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Well, apparently he stopped editing, so no need for a block. :) · AndonicO  Hail!  18:28, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
 * By the way, just noticed you helped me as a newcomer. That was ages ago, heh. · AndonicO  Hail!  18:28, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Yes. :) In case you're interested, I mediated a few cases successfully, before running into the Muhammad images one... I think you can guess what happened then. · AndonicO  Hail!  23:18, 9 February 2008 (UTC)

Gligan
I sorry, but that Romanian nationalist is going on with the vandalism, this time for the city of Ruse. I reverted his edit only once and now I am writing to you to take measures and avoid another edit war like that in Vidin. Regards, --Gligan (talk) 15:35, 23 January 2008 (UTC)


 * He is obviously not here now but still, please keep an eye on that article and tell me whether I shall revert possible future vandalism myself or I shall wait for you or someone else to do that. Of course I can start discussion on that matter on Talk:Ruse. --Gligan (talk) 17:06, 23 January 2008 (UTC)


 * Just see what is he doing. He does not state reasons for his edits and is constantly pushing them. See Talk:Ruse and tell him to stop. --Gligan (talk) 17:49, 23 January 2008 (UTC)

Would you like to unblock?
The user in question has only one edit, a vandalism edit. They wiped out part of a user page. Do you want to give them a 2nd chance? If so, go ahead. I have seen other admin block indef for users with only 1 or 2 edits, all of them unmistakable vandalism. Archtransit (talk) 18:04, 23 January 2008 (UTC)

RfB
It's been reverted, but I informed the individual I nominated... anyhow, thanks for the notice! --Solumeiras (talk) 23:42, 23 January 2008 (UTC)

Re:RfA
Thanks for your message. I expected a rough ride but all this brou-ha-ha is completely off the wall. I guess I have an instinct for when things aren't quite right, and fortunately, I was right (for once); otherwise, exit, stage left, with egg on face. I guess your next nom will be an easier ride. For now, I'm going to sit back and see what happens next, and it's good that colleagues are still coming forward to support me while all this is ongoing. Again, thanks for your support. --Rodhullandemu  (Talk) 20:24, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Oh, purrr-lease, I am not awesome, I just believe in following the process, being above-board and accountable. If this RfA succeeds, however, I'm fully conscious that there may be a backlash from those who would imagine that I might consider myself fireproof. No way. I could have done all this through email, and I considered that, but my candidate statement covers my reasoning on that. After all this is over and done, I just want to get back to writing articles. That's why I came here. Much kudos for your continued support, and thanks again. --Rodhullandemu  (Talk) 22:24, 24 January 2008 (UTC)

Thankyou
Thankyou for the unblock. Trimy67 (talk) 00:07, 25 January 2008 (UTC)

comment
I think Dramaticaddict18923 gets my vote as oddest edit of the day. Well handled, btw. KillerChihuahua?!? 00:30, 25 January 2008 (UTC)

Re:ADMINCOACH
Hey, hey, hey. Maybe there's some steps I gotta take before getting an adco, but I'm not sure. Point is, newcomers aren't the only ones people shouldn't bite. Got it?  Two One Six Five Five  discuss my greatness 19:04, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Oh. Uh, okay... Sorry...  Two One Six Five Five  discuss my greatness 20:01, 25 January 2008 (UTC)

Saeb Erekat
What did you have in mind at Saeb Erekat? PRtalk 09:14, 26 January 2008 (UTC)

RFA
, Thank you for your support in my RFA which passed 43/0/1. I would like to especially thank Bibliomaniac15 for being my nominator and admin coach. I would also like to thank Rudget for being my co-nominator. I'm sure that I can live up to the community's expectations as an administrator, and not totally mess everything up. Thanks again for your support! Malinaccier (talk) 17:13, 26 January 2008 (UTC)

thank you
very much for unblocking the atuoblock --SLICKFINGERS (talk) 00:55, 27 January 2008 (UTC)

thank god for you, i've been looking for someone to REALLY help me for days. --SLICKFINGERS (talk) 01:00, 27 January 2008 (UTC)

Felix Bloch deletion
why was the page deleted? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.156.66.190 (talk) 06:00, 27 January 2008 (UTC)

My RfA
Has passed; many thanks for the nomination, I didn't expect that you would get dragged into the mess that it became, or indeed that it would become a mess at all. I haven't been here long, but for an RfA to spawn an SSP check, CU check and an ArbCom case must be a first. Now all that remains is to clear up that mess and get on with, er, building an encyclopedia here. Now, your next task, should you wish to accept it, is to find a nominee who will sail through without drama. I don't believe in spamming pretty pictures around the place, so this will have to do. But I do appreciate the effort you've put in on my behalf. Perhaps I can now sleep for a while. Kind Regards. --Rodhullandemu  (Talk) 23:05, 27 January 2008 (UTC)

Reductio ad Hitlerum
Well, I've found Harry Truman (Hiroshima and Nagasaki responsible) as a respectable guy. Shou'd be a joke. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Rio4tense (talk • contribs) 15:45, 28 January 2008 (UTC)

Odette Yustman
Ok thank you. I do believe that it has a license under GFDL -- its just that I was not sure how to signify this in the caption. Please give me a minute to scare up this source. Thank you very much and have a good day. Belicia (talk) 21:17, 28 January 2008 (UTC)

Zombies
Hi Bugbear, I've been here awhile so I've certainly seen WP:CABAL linked before... I'm not sure what point you hoped to get across, and I'm disappointed if my line of questioning seemed either ignorant or abstruse. Is your point: the editor is criticizing the Cabal, which is obviously valid criticism? Is your point: the editor is calling a certain group of people Cabalists, which is afoul of NPA? Or that criticizing cabalism is unfair, pointless, incorrect, etc. I asked a very specific question and "WP:CABAL" wasn't really an answer at all. I'm curious what you hoped to convey with the link. --JayHenry (talk) 02:59, 29 January 2008 (UTC)


 * Thanks for following up with the explanation on my talk page. The situation was genuinely inscrutable to me and I'm someone who is familiar with, shall we say, the long arc of the User:ScienceApologist story and its related issues, but not all the details.  I can see both sides, where on the one hand there's some content that's been pushed away from neutrality, and on the other hand those editors trying to return it to neutrality (or what they see as neutrality) sometimes crossing the line in terms of civility.  As a general caution against groupthink I think the essay is probably okay, but if it ends up being frequently used as an attack I'd probably rethink that stance. --JayHenry (talk) 05:47, 30 January 2008 (UTC)

Digital Movers LLC
The reason I suggested SteveBurch to Steve Burch is that usurping a name might be more confusing for a new user than renaming. However, it seems it doesn't matter in this case because the user created Steve Burch anyway. Thanks for the note, however. Acalamari 18:43, 29 January 2008 (UTC)

MER MEC S.p.A
I have no problem at all with your suggestion. I definitely appreciate you letting me know, but you didn't have to. I'm new and far from perfect. Jauerbackdude?/dude. 18:25, 1 February 2008 (UTC)

Johnnie Ray mediation
Hi. I'm just wondering if we can somehow move forward in the Johnnie Ray mediation case. The other user, Dooyar, hasn't participated in the last 11 days. Is there an alternative step we can take in their absence? Thanks! Pinkadelica (talk) 06:08, 4 February 2008 (UTC)


 * Great, thanks! Dooyar has done this before so we know the game. He/she will pop up after changes have been made and begin reverting/changing, etc, but we can deal with it. Again, thanks for your help and patience. Pinkadelica (talk) 20:06, 4 February 2008 (UTC)

Re: block of Rappingwonders
Hi Bugbear, thanks for the heads up. I strongly endorse the autoblock. Considering that the banned user has a long history of impersonation and that one of his other IPs was, this is almost certainly him. The list of active blocks shows he's been trying to edit for several days after his account was blocked. It's not surprising he's finally requesting an unblock. Spellcast (talk) 01:14, 5 February 2008 (UTC)

BRC
You've been invited. GlassCobra 07:46, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
 * - TRANSMISSION ENDS -

Muahahh...I mean, we look forward to your application. ;) GlassCobra 00:09, 6 February 2008 (UTC)

Navbar
Thank you for the Wiki Navbar, it is very useful. I'm a bit confused about UserPages -> My Tools -> Edit Counter. It brings me to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Interiot/Tool2/code.js which I don't understand at all, sorry. Can you help. Thanks! Captain Infinity (talk) 18:41, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Thanks, all set! Captain Infinity (talk) 23:58, 5 February 2008 (UTC)

Welcome to the Jungle
Welcome brother, to our Bathrobe Cabal. Please familiarize yourself with the aims of the The Illustrious and Honorable Bathrobe Cabal of Wikipedia.

As is customary, the welcome song shall be sung:

Welcome to the jungle! We got fun n' games, We got everything you want. Honey, we know the names. We are the people that can find - Whatever you may need. If you got the money honey; We got your disease. In the jungle! Welcome to the jungle! Watch it bring you to your shunn,n,n,n,,n,n,,n,n,n,,n,n,,n knees, knees; I wanna watch you bleed! If you have a suggestion for the advancement of the Bathrobe Cabal of Wikipedia; or a country you would like to see invaded, please direct your comment to the Bathrobe Cabal diabolical discussion page. You are also welcome to join your brothers at our schmooze lounge, where a custom avatar has already been made for you. Stay frosty! GlassCobra 21:48, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
 * - TRANSMISSION ENDS -
 * I said this to Daniel, but I'll say it here too. Nice hair. dihydrogen monoxide (H20) 07:44, 9 February 2008 (UTC)


 * Wickedest cheesy grin since EVula's! ;) ~ Riana ⁂ 06:02, 10 February 2008 (UTC)

signature
If not on the board about user names, then do you suggest I post it to the main general board? Cuñado ☼ -  Talk  01:37, 9 February 2008 (UTC)