User talk:Reweral

June 2023
Hello, Reweral. We welcome your contributions, but it appears as if your primary purpose on Wikipedia is to add citations to research published by a small group of researchers.

Editing in this way is a violation of the policy against using Wikipedia for promotion and is a form of conflict of interest in Wikipedia – please see WP:SELFCITE and WP:MEDCOI. The editing community considers excessive self-citing to be a form of spamming on Wikipedia (WP:REFSPAM); the edits will be reviewed and the citations removed where it was not appropriate to add them.

Scientific articles should prefer secondary sources to ensure that the information added is trusted by the scientific community.

The editing community highly values expert contributors, so I do hope you will consider contributing more broadly. If you wish to contribute, please first consider citing review articles written by other researchers in your field and which are already highly cited in the literature. If you wish to cite your own research, please start a new section on the article's talk page and add request edit to ask a volunteer to review whether or not the citation should be added.

MrOllie (talk) 13:38, 14 June 2023 (UTC)


 * Hello MrOllie
 * I noticed you "undo" two changes at schizotypal personality disorder page. The published version is wrong, and that is the reason why I changed it. First, metacognitive therapy refers to a model developed by Adrian Wells, whereas the quote in the text (that is consistent with existing knowledge on StPD) is about metacognitively oriented therapy such as MERIT (Metacognitive Reflection and Insight Therapy) and MIT (Metacognitive Interpersonal Therapy). If you open the reference (n° 246) you can easily see the differences. Second, when the text refers to effectiveness of ESTS does not make sense in the present form. It says "to be as effective as a combination of cognitive behavioral therapy". The reference (N° 252) is about ESTS vs CBT + psychopharmacotherapy. Reweral (talk) 14:30, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
 * That's not a response to the warning above. Wikipedia is not a place to promote little known academics, or to write about medical information that does not meet our requirements as given by WP:MEDRS. MrOllie (talk) 16:19, 14 June 2023 (UTC)

Hello, Reweral, welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. Your editing pattern indicates that you may be using multiple accounts or coordinating editing with people outside Wikipedia. Our policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow this, and users who misuse multiple accounts may be blocked from editing. If you operate multiple accounts directly or with the help of another person, please disclose these connections. Thank you. MrOllie (talk) 16:20, 14 June 2023 (UTC)


 * Hello MrOllie
 * I asked a colleague of mine (Losciapiede) to thank my reivision, since I find your revision really anomalous and vandalic. I did not write the sentence you cancelled, just edited a wrong thing. And then you cancel an important information for the reader. I find really abusive this kind of behavior and totally anti-scientific. Reweral (talk) 16:32, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Making personal attacks and enlisting people to edit on your behalf are both against the rules here and could easily lead to being blocked. Please rethink what you're doing. MrOllie (talk) 16:54, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
 * It's the last time I contribute to wikipedia. Don't worry I'm leaving.
 * Look back at the history and you will see that:
 * - I added a comment to improve a text written by others;
 * - you have deleted my revision and all the text;
 * - I tried to put the text back without my revision
 * - you deleted everything and want to block me.
 * What would be the meaning of this behavior? Reweral (talk) 17:03, 14 June 2023 (UTC)

 You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text at the bottom of your talk page:. Ponyo bons mots 21:06, 14 June 2023 (UTC)


 * Reweral (talk) 06:17, 15 June 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Evolutionary Systems Therapy for Schizotypy (November 1)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Timtrent was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Evolutionary Systems Therapy for Schizotypy and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=Draft:Evolutionary_Systems_Therapy_for_Schizotypy Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Timtrent&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Evolutionary_Systems_Therapy_for_Schizotypy reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

🇺🇦 Fiddle Timtrent  Faddle Talk to me 🇺🇦 12:14, 1 November 2023 (UTC)