User talk:Rewster

Welcome!

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:
 * The Five Pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Editing, policy, conduct, and structure tutorial
 * Picture tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Naming conventions
 * Manual of Style
 * If you're ready for the complete list of Wikipedia documentation, there's also Topical index.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and vote pages using three tildes, like this: &#126;&#126;&#126;. Four tildes (&#126;&#126;&#126;&#126;) produces your name and the current date. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my Talk page. Again, welcome! - UtherSRG 22:49, May 10, 2005 (UTC)

Julian C. Stanley copyvio
While press releases are a good source of biographical information about people, they're still copyrighted by their actual authors. Wikipedia can't accept material that you don't own, even press releases. So I've removed the middle, copyright-violating portion of the Julian Stanley article you contributed. (The page is very timely, though!) --Quuxplusone 03:30, 25 August 2005 (UTC)



Emergency department vote
The above article is likely to be selected as next weeks choice at Article Improvement Drive if it receives a few more votes. It is of interest to Wikipedians in general, and would improve the profile of medical-related topics on Wikipedia. To vote, click on WP:AID and sign your name in the Emergency department section.--File Éireann 18:53, 14 November 2005 (UTC)

Fantastic work!
I just wanted to say that you did a wonderful job editing the pneumonia article! You are really good at this! InvictaHOG 10:50, 19 November 2005 (UTC)

Prostate cancer on WP:MCOTW
Hi! You showed support for Prostate cancer, this week's Medicine Collaboration of the Week. You are invited to help improve it! &mdash; Knowledge Seeker &#2470; 01:41, 22 November 2005 (UTC)


 * Not only did you contribute...but you did another fabulous job! Thanks again for all the hard work! InvictaHOG 01:45, 13 December 2005 (UTC)

Atrial fibrillation on WP:MCOTW
You expressed support for Atrial fibrillation, this week's Medicine Collaboration of the Week. You are invited to help improve it! &mdash; Knowledge Seeker &#2470; 04:40, 28 December 2005 (UTC)

Adding references
I have never previously seen the article on The Impossible Syndrome - however I did add an edit to the Clinical Medicine's talk page re using a bookmarklet to use a PubMed PMID number converting tool to add full reference citations. Unfortunately this has just been archived ! So, as per your sensible suggestion, I have copied and clarified the details to WikiProject Clinical medicine project page under the section about references: Wikipedia:WikiProject Clinical medicine#References

Hope this helps. David Ruben Talk 02:06, 23 January 2006 (UTC)

Prostate-Answers.com is link spam?
I've spent countless hours on creating that site for prostate cancer patients and their families. I treat cancer patients for a living and see on average 37 patients a day with prostate cancer each on a 9 week prescription. I have been a radiation therapist for the past 10 years and have done my fair share of research and have real life experience on the subject of prostate cancer. I know when patients come for treatment they are often uninformed and overwhelmed. I felt that I could contribute and answer some of their questions they might have and provide some information not filled with technical jargon that is hard to understand. Being diagnosed with cancer and then being tossed from doctors office to doctors office, alot of things are said that someone who has just been diagnosed with cancer might not absorb right away. I know patients often come for their first treatment or even simulation for radiation therapy and have no clue why they are there. Of course they have been told but it doesn't sink in. Seeing this over the years has given me the idea for my sites. But I suppose you are the #1 authority on the subject leading you to believe you can just pull my work.

If your removing my site because of the Google Ads then why not remove http://www.urologychannel.com too?? I make about enough money to keep my website running. &mdash;The preceding unsigned comment was added by Bilransom (talk &bull; contribs) 16:54, 25 February 2006 (UTC).

Alexina Louie
I'm so happy you are so excited about Alexina Louie. I added some stuff to the talk page for you. Devahn58 22:31, 1 March 2006 (UTC)

Glycogen storage disease type III
Was editing at same time as you! I do adult gastroenterology, so would appreciate if you could fix any errors I made! Hope I didn't delete any of your changes... Cheers -- Samir ∙ TC  06:28, 7 March 2006 (UTC)

Template:Infobox_Disease
Per your question on my talk page -- I have written a first draft of a tutorial and put it at Template:Infobox_Disease, but if you have any further questions or suggestions, don't hesitate to ask. --Arcadian 23:41, 11 March 2006 (UTC)

Re: Malignant Histiocytosis
Thanks for the information on that article, Rewster. I guess it must only have been created recently, otherwise it would have wound up on the list of Veterinary Stubs when I was cross category searching while proposing the veteriunary stubs for inclusion. The article has now been moved to the list of stubs for that area, and I thank you for bringing the matter to my attention. Thor Malmjursson 11:28, 14 March 2006 (UTC) Thor's Pet Yack

on Precompiled header
I would appreciate it if you could list the things that you feel need to be explained. —kotepho 2006-03-19 18:50Z 

“Medicine” on MCOTW
After a bit of inactivity, Medicine has been selected as the new medicine collaboration of the week. I am taking the unusual step of informing all participants, not just those who voted for it, since I feel that it is important that this highest-level topic for our collaboration be extremely well-written. In addition, it is a core topic for Wikipedia 1.0 and serves as the introduction to our other articles. Yet general articles are the ones that are most difficult for individuals to write, which is why I have invited all participants. I hope it isn't an intrusion; I don't make plan to make a habit of sending out these messages. — Knowledge Seeker দ 02:16, 16 April 2006 (UTC)

Kaprow
Please see the talk page; Talk:Allan_Kaprow Selfinformation 23:14, 2 May 2006 (UTC)

Reynolds syndrome
Brilliant rewrite! -- Samir  धर्म 06:24, 24 May 2006 (UTC)

Rotor syndrome
Thank you for copyediting the article! --Steven Fruitsmaak 17:46, 25 May 2006 (UTC)

Kazuyoshi Ishii
Thanks for cleaning up this article. JRHorse 00:49, 1 June 2006 (UTC)

WP:GI
Hi Rewster, any interest in joining WikiProject Gastroenterology? We'd appreciate your help if you have the time. Cheers -- Samir  धर्म 05:54, 9 June 2006 (UTC)

Biography
Can you justify as to how My Biography is Vanity, before recommending that for deletionDoctor Bruno 05:03, 5 August 2006 (UTC) On the other hand, I invite your attention to the following guidelines
 * There are no commercial links.
 * There are no Vanity links.
 * There are no Vanity photos.
 * There are no Vanity text edits.
 * An article should not be dismissed as "vanity" simply because the subject is not famous. There is currently no consensus about what degree of recognition is required to justify a unique article being created in Wikipedia
 * Lack of fame is not the same as vanity.Doctor Bruno 05:11, 5 August 2006 (UTC)

Author's Biography
I have ALREADY read the guidelines and have given the key points above. Hence your advice of asking me to read the guidelines is not needed. It is perhaps you who should read that

If what you say is correct, then NO author can be allowed an entry in Wikipedia as that will amount to promote the books. You have made a hasty judgement in that page and now trying to justify that. I have listed evnough reasons as to why this is not Vanity. There are authors with less number of books who have an article. But you do not give any valid reason for your point. And this is not comprehensibleDoctor Bruno 05:36, 5 August 2006 (UTC)

Attention Please
I request your kind attention to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Biographies_of_living_persons#Using_the_subject_as_a_source ''check that the article in question does not contain any unsourced or poorly sourced criticism. If it does, delete it.'' Hence, I guess, as per policies, I have every right to delete an article about me I don't want guys who have NO (I repeat NO) knowledge about Indian Books pass judgement about my merit unnecessarily. The article was proposed for deletion first on notability. When I proved notability, it has changed to Vanity. I guess it is some one who does not like me trying to tarnish my name Doctor Bruno 14:18, 5 August 2006 (UTC) The debate is not a vote; please make recommendations on the course of action to be taken, sustained by arguments. The very fact that you have not given any arguments, and also falied to answer my points prove that you have malicious intention in defaming meDoctor Bruno 16:17, 5 August 2006 (UTC)

Why are you against me
I have proved as to how my page is not vanity. You can disprove me. Instead why are you hell bent on defacing my arguments. This gives me an impression that you are biased. How can you delete an article without hearing all sides.Doctor Bruno 01:51, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
 * I have placed the proof on your talk page. If you feel otherwise, you could have refuted that based on the Guidelines of Wikipedia. I have proved that why the Article does not come under vanity as per Guidelines. You did not answer that (may be because you don't have any valid points). But you are very particular as to devalue by arguments.


 * I have written 6 books out of which 5 has been published by reputed publisher. One user has conveniently ignored the 5 and has taken out the lone book which has been self published and is using that as an argument for notability. Should not I point it out. Why are you biased. It is because you gave a hasty decision and your ego prevents you from going back on your initial mistakeDoctor Bruno 06:41, 7 August 2006 (UTC)

Rating article question
I just noticed that you rated the Leslie Charteris article as a stub. I'm curious as to why, since my understanding is stubs only contain a minimum amount of information and once they go past a certain length they are no longer stubs. Based upon its length and amount of information, this should be a Start class at minimum and possible one grade higher. 23skidoo 02:19, 18 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Thanks. There's no doubt a lot of work needs to be done on the article, but I just felt it had a bit more content than a stub. Cheers! 23skidoo 02:49, 18 August 2006 (UTC)

WP:MED
Hi,

the main page of WikiProject Medicine has just been redesigned, comments are welcome! Please consider listing yourself as a participant.

--Steven Fruitsmaak (Reply) 23:37, 6 September 2006 (UTC)

Feingold diet
Hi!

We need a few second opinions on the Feingold diet page. It started out as a crib from QuackWatch, and was re-written by Shula and me. It's now pretty much in the Feingold camp. What we need is some fresh eyes to get it encyclopedic and balanced. Hope you can help. --Slashme 07:41, 12 October 2006 (UTC)

Woolverstone Hall
Greetings. I plan to make changes to this entry. As an interested contributor, you might like to check out the discussion at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Woolverstone_Hall —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Aeronian (talk • contribs) 04:02, 1 April 2007 (UTC).

Infantile Cortical Hyperostosis
Dear Rewster,

I don't know how Wikipadia works, so if I'm writing on a wrong place: delete it.

I saw that you changed some text in the article of Caffey's Disease/ Infantile Cortical Hyperostosis. I have some questions about it. Can you help me, or do you know some one who can help me? Please, can you contact me (on my e-mail)? M248 13:38, 20 June 2007 (UTC)

CDG
I noticed you added subtypes III and IV to CDG syndrome but all references I have still only describe I and II. I have temporarily removed III and IV but if you can show me a source for III and IV we can accommodate. alteripse 15:40, 23 July 2007 (UTC)

Cardiology task force
-- Addbot (talk) 00:07, 7 January 2013 (UTC) T.F.AlHammouri (talk) 21:57, 1 March 2009 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Library now offering accounts from Cochrane Collaboration (sign up!)
The Wikipedia Library gets Wikipedia editors free access to reliable sources that are behind paywalls. Because you are signed on as a medical editor, I thought you'd want to know about our most recent donation from Cochrane Collaboration. Cheers, Ocaasit &#124; c 20:26, 16 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Cochrane Collaboration is an independent medical nonprofit organization that conducts systematic reviews of randomized controlled trials of health-care interventions, which it then publishes in the Cochrane Library.
 * Cochrane has generously agreed to give free, full-access accounts to 100 medical editors. Individual access would otherwise cost between $300 and $800 per account.
 * If you are still active as a medical editor, come and sign up :)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:03, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Wikiversity Journal of Medicine, an open access peer reviewed journal with no charges, invites you to participate
Hi

Did you know about Wikiversity Journal of Medicine? It is an open access, peer reviewed medical journal, with no publication charges. You can find more about it by reading the article on The Signpost featuring this journal.

We welcome you to have a look the journal. Like us on Facebook or follow us on Twitter. Feel free to participate in the journal.

You can participate in any one or more of the following ways:
 * Publish an article to the journal.
 * Sign up as a peer reviewer of potential upcoming articles. If you do not have expertise in these subjects, you can help in finding peer reviewers for current submissions.
 * Sign up as an editor, and help out in open tasks.
 * Outreach to potential contributors, with can include (but is not limited to) scholars and health professionals. In any mention of Wikiversity Journal of Medicine, there may be a reference to this Contribute-page. Example presentation about the journal.
 * Add a post-publication review of an existing publication. If errors are found, there are guidelines for editing published works.
 * Join the editorial board.
 * Share your ideas of what the journal would be like in the future as separate Wikimedia project.
 * Donate to Wikimedia Foundation.
 * Translate journal pages into other languages. Wikiversity currently exists in the following other languages
 * Ceština, Deutsch, Español, Français, Italiano, 한국어, Português, Slovenšcina, Suomi, Svenska, Ελληνικά, Русский, العربية, 日本語
 * Technical work like template designing for the journal.
 * Sign up to get emails related to the journal, which are sent to . If you want to receive these emails too, state your interest at the talk page, or contact the Editor-in-chief at.
 * Spread the word to anyone who could be interested or could benefit from it.

The future of this journal as a separate Wikimedia project is under discussion and the name can be changed suitably. Currently a voting for the same is underway. Please cast your vote in the name you find most suitable. We would be glad to receive further suggestions from you. It is also acceptable to mention your votes in the email list. Please note that the voting closes on 16th August, 2016, unless protracted by consensus, due to any reason.

 D ip ta ns hu Talk 14:49, 11 August 2016 (UTC) -on behalf of the Editorial Board, Wikiversity Journal of Medicine.

"BAER" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect BAER. Since you had some involvement with the BAER redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Beeblebrox (talk) 02:20, 1 October 2019 (UTC)

Society of Teachers of Family Medicine moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Society of Teachers of Family Medicine, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.  CASSIOPEIA(talk) 05:48, 27 December 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Society of Teachers of Family Medicine (April 12)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Waggie was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Society of Teachers of Family Medicine and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Society of Teachers of Family Medicine, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "Db-g7" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Society_of_Teachers_of_Family_Medicine Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Waggie&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Society_of_Teachers_of_Family_Medicine reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Waggie (talk) 19:03, 12 April 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Society of Teachers of Family Medicine


Hello, Rewster. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Society of Teachers of Family Medicine".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 19:15, 12 October 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, User:Rewster/Sandbox3


Hello, Rewster. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Sandbox3".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the, , or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Celestina007 (talk) 21:29, 13 October 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Impossible syndrome for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Impossible syndrome is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Impossible syndrome until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 10:39, 24 November 2021 (UTC)