User talk:Rexkut

Nomination of Springer Materials - Online Database for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Springer Materials - Online Database is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Springer Materials - Online Database until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. wctaiwan (talk) 14:26, 18 July 2011 (UTC)

advice
You must not have realized we have an article on Landolt-Bornnstein, and the information should have been merged into that article. I shall try to rescue it. In any case, you should not have copied the publisher's description, but written a proper article, using third party sources.

I assume you have COI, and are possibly doing this as publicity for Springer--if I am mistaken, I apologize. If so, this is not prohibited, but you will not accomplish it by editing in this fashion.

As a general rule, a suitable page will be best written by someone without Conflict of Interest; it's not impossible to do it properly with a conflict of interest or as a paid press agent, but it's relatively more difficult: you are automatically thinking in terms of the organization wishes to communicate to the public, but an uninvolved person will think in terms of what the public might wish to know.

Remember not to copy from a web site, even your own -- first it's a copyright violation, but, even if you give   permission according to WP:DCM, which most organizations are unwilling to do (it gives irrevocable permission for anyone to use and modify the material, even for commercial purposes), the tone will not be encyclopedic and the material will not be suitable.

If you think you can do it right according to the guidelines, do so, but expect the article to be carefully checked for objectivity. It will do no good to write articles that will be deleted. If you need further help, ask me, for I often work on articles of this sort in the sciences.  DGG ( talk ) 19:39, 31 July 2011 (UTC)