User talk:ReyBrujo/Archive 3

WikiLove!


Here's a painting of James Monroe for you! James Monroe somehow promotes WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by giving something friendly to someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Make your own message to spread WikiLove to others using Template:smile! Happy editing! --TBC TaLk?!? 05:21, 1 September 2006 (UTC)

Get it, James Monroe for ReyBrujo? Anyhow, keep up the good work on Wikipedia, you've contributed a lot of great edits. :D (another ackward attempt at comedy by TBC TaLk?!? )

Thanks
Thank you very much for helping me out with standards and whatnot. I'll get the hang of this stuff eventually, I suppose. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by AOEU (talk • contribs).
 * Replied on the user's talk page. -- ReyBrujo 20:30, 2 September 2006 (UTC)

Thanks
Rey, just wanted to say thanks for sticking with the WP:EL debate. We seem to be getting closer, and closer to a consensus as time goes by. I have updated my proposal based on your comment. I didn't think anything would succeed without a firm limit either :-). Please check it out and let me know if you find it a good comprimise. - mjg0503 04:07, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Replied on the article talk page. -- ReyBrujo 04:54, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
 * We are looking into the possibility of having a straw poll. Any objections? - Mike 04:00, 5 September 2006 (UTC)

lightsteelblue vs. orange
To get the ball rolling on the vote on studio albums, I've started a tally here please voice your opinion at your earliest convenience. --Cheers, Folajimi (leave a note) 21:49, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Had a chance to vote yet? --Cheers, Folajimi (leave a note) 21:20, 5 September 2006 (UTC)

The poll on the proposed switch has been open for ten days, and I have taken the liberty of closing the event. Consensus favors the switch to lightsteelblue.

ReyBrujo, your work over the past four months or so in support of this effort is greatly appreciated. Your actions were rather invaluable in implementing the idea of a standard framework, and I doubt that the template would have come into being so soon without you. For that, I am most grateful.

Many thanks for again for your involvement. See you around! --Cheers, Folajimi (leave a note) 16:00, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Replied on the user's talk page. -- ReyBrujo 16:31, 14 September 2006 (UTC)

PS3 / Xbox Hardware "list"
Can I get your input on the rewrite of the "hardware specs" sections on Playstation 3 and Xbox 360? User:74.33.0.16 and User:Jigahurtz -- who I suspect are one and the same -- are, quite unhelpfully, reverting back to The Wrong Version (tm). Nandesuka 04:15, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Replied on the PlayStation 3 article talk page and the user's talk page.  -- ReyBrujo 04:44, 5 September 2006 (UTC)

leak discussion
hey man, just wanted to say that when i said "no offence" before, i actually meant it... i know you took it well and stuff, but when i read it again it seemed like i was going out of my way to be an arsehead, which was not the actual intention. cheers for giving me the benefit etc. -- W guice 21:10, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Replied on the user's talk page. -- ReyBrujo 21:39, 5 September 2006 (UTC)

Problem
Hey Rey, I seem to be having a problem viewing my userpage...in that I can't. It gives me the Wikipedia has a problem message every time, I can view other pages, I don't understand this...you have any suggestions? DoomsDay349 22:52, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Replied on the user's talk page. -- ReyBrujo 18:42, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Hey! I think you were right, it was probably too busy. I got on eventually. Thanks! DoomsDay349 20:04, 6 September 2006 (UTC)

Looking for a Template
Hey again Rey, I'm looking for info on a template which I can't name, hopefully you know, as I'm considering making one for Dragonlance. Here's an example: Template:Inheritance. If you can tell me the name and maybe provide a link on how to make them, then I can get right to work on making one for Dragonlance. Thanks! DoomsDay349 21:41, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Replied on the user's talk page. -- ReyBrujo 01:46, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Hey again, I copy/pasted the Inheritance template thingy, and adjusted it to make it fit with Dragonlance...but the info would still be nice, and I'd of course like your help with it. It's on my sandbox and also I'm gonna put it into Template namespace soon.  Thanks. DoomsDay349 22:48, 6 September 2006 (UTC)

You should be an admin.
May I nominate you? Nandesuka 05:19, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Replied on the user's talk page. -- ReyBrujo 05:26, 7 September 2006 (UTC)

What guideline I was refering to
Abundance and redundancy It is a preferred solution that material be included rather than excluded to resolve an edit war.

Guideline states in an edit war, information should be included rather than removed. I'd consider anything in clear violation of wikipolicy/guidelines vandalism, which is covered in the exception. Although after rereading the policy it says simple vandalism, and I am unsure if direct violation of policy falls under the simple category. I'll make sure not to state that exception again since I'd be streching the rules to make it. But I will enforce wikipolicies and guidelines.DeathSeeker 05:30, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Replied on the user's talk page. -- ReyBrujo 05:38, 7 September 2006 (UTC)

Is the list de-bulletened enough to satisfy you?DeathSeeker 07:07, 7 September 2006 (UTC)

That '70s Show
It is A Awesome Decade —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Vrrayman1988 (talk • contribs).

Jesus
Like This Do Penis At School? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Vrrayman1988 (talk • contribs).

Wikipedia That '70s Show
You like That '70s Show yes or no

That '70s Show —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Vrrayman1988 (talk • contribs).

Hey Mister
Watch go to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:KHill-LTown —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Vrrayman1988 (talk • contribs).

watch
go to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:KHill-LTown —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Vrrayman1988 (talk • contribs).

syntax request.
As of 20:21 on 14 September 2006 (UTC), I noticed that the album template background used for Mute (album) is, in a word, hideous ; could you please explain how this can be fixed? --Cheers, Folajimi (leave a note) 20:25, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Replied on the user's talk page. -- ReyBrujo 20:38, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the timely reply. The manual revisions can be made if need be; accessing features provided by the newer template is paramount. --Cheers, Folajimi (leave a note) 21:55, 14 September 2006 (UTC)

Time of the Twins
Hey Rey. I created the Time of the Twins article, and I was wondering if you could look over it (particularly the Plot Summary, as it's probably off) and fix it up. Thanks! DoomsDay349 23:18, 15 September 2006 (UTC)

funny
Look up http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:KHill-LTown

and http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/KSMO-TV

Thats Funny —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Vrrayman1991 (talk • contribs).

Your recent "test" in Template:Album
Got a smile when I realized what you had done :), I can give you a hint how to do it: style="background: ; text-align: center;" → A z a  Toth 02:06, 17 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Replied on the user's talk page. -- ReyBrujo 02:22, 17 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Hehe, if you look at your code, you'll see that if returns nothing, the end result will be style="background: Background;..." → A z  a  Toth 02:33, 17 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Replied on the user's talk page. -- ReyBrujo 02:42, 17 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Ok, I think I understand what you mean now, so I have made a quick fix to the template as I think you wanted it. → A z a  Toth 02:54, 17 September 2006 (UTC)
 * It does look like it is still defaulting to the background color when there is an out-of-range value in Type. Fantailfan 13:10, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Replied on the user's talk page. -- ReyBrujo 13:36, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Addenum found at -- ReyBrujo 18:07, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Thank you - very nice job.Fantailfan 18:11, 18 September 2006 (UTC)

Succession box for dates
Do you know if there is an easy way to create a succession box to move from one page to another? There are pages listed in chronological order where such a feature would ease navigation. --Cheers, Folajimi (leave a note) 02:36, 17 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Replied on the user's talk page. -- ReyBrujo 06:14, 17 September 2006 (UTC)
 * This is hardly a do-or-die matter; however, I am eager to hear of what solutions you may have to offer on the subject matter. --Cheers, Folajimi (leave a note) 03:28, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Any luck finding a viable solution? --Cheers, Folajimi (leave a note) 02:03, 22 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Replied on the user's talk page. -- ReyBrujo 13:21, 22 September 2006 (UTC)
 * For an example of what I am referring to, see the included link. It has a pair of links named "next page" and "prev page" at the top of the page. It may seem cheesy, but such a feature would make it easy to navigate a project I am working on relating to birthdays. In this case, "prev page" will link to the previous date, while "next page" should link to the day after the current page of birthdays. Let me know if this helps. --Cheers, Folajimi (leave a note) 21:52, 22 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Replied on the user's talk page. -- ReyBrujo 22:46, 22 September 2006 (UTC)
 * The cvg example seems about right; can it be adapted for days, as opposed to years? Cheers, Folajimi (leave a note) 23:46, 22 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Is there a cleaner/easier template available somewhere else? Perhaps there is a way to modify it to handle dates... --Cheers, Folajimi (leave a note) 23:14, 23 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Replied on the user's talk page. -- ReyBrujo 04:09, 24 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Is it possible to have the template handle leap years (i.e. display Feb. 29) on a quadrennial basis? Cheers, Folajimi (leave a note) 12:40, 24 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Replied on the user's talk page. -- ReyBrujo 16:01, 24 September 2006 (UTC)

Ben Underwood
I have removed the prod tag from Ben Underwood, which you proposed for deletion. I'm leaving this message here to notify you about it. I have nominated the article for deletion instead; the debate may be found at Articles for deletion/Ben Underwood, which overrides the need for a prod tag. I have explained my reasons for doing this in my nomination. Thanks! Roninbk 10:31, 18 September 2006 (UTC)

Help
Hi... I was working on a page you found and you left a whole bunch of tags. I realize you might think you're helping by doing this, but some of my friends dont even know how to add the things you tagged about...so why don't you help out rather than telling other people to fix it? Surely to a wiki genius like yourself it would only take a second.

-wikiwikidj —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Wikiwikidj (talk • contribs) 16:17, 18 September 2006 (UTC)

Hex values
Shouldn't be a problem. Glad the new template came off as planned. Rich Farmbrough, 21:39 18 September 2006 (GMT).


 * Incidentally removing background altogether is possible, but some other templates use the same parameter. Rich Farmbrough, 21:54 18 September 2006 (GMT).
 * Replied on the user's talk page. -- ReyBrujo 22:07, 18 September 2006 (UTC)


 * Both the extra templates should be migratable. It is unfortunate that they both have background parameters, though, it makes things a little more complex, but still do-able. Rich Farmbrough, 22:24 18 September 2006 (GMT).
 * Replied on the user's talk page. -- ReyBrujo 22:28, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
 * OK, that makes sense. I will try to do the hex values tomorrow, and the rest will take some time. Rich Farmbrough, 22:40 18  September 2006 (GMT).


 * All the hex backgrounds I could find should be done shortly. I have started removing other backgrounds from the infobox as well.  I tried one of the "2" templates without a background parameter, it defaulted to yellow, so I'm not touching the extended stuff ATM. Rich Farmbrough, 22:43 19  September 2006 (GMT).

Confusion
Hey Rey. I was reading over a response you made to someone a while ago, I believe it was to Dragonball1986, in regard to uploading images on Wikipedia. While skimming this, I discovered this little tidbit: "the law says only 18 years old or older can write in wikis, but Wikipedia requests you to have 21". I was incredibly confused by this, as I was aware of no such restriction. Also, there are userboxes that allow you to list your status in school and also your age, and some of these userboxes are obviously meant for those under 21 (for example, one such userbox allows you to proclaim yourself a middle school student). Could you please clarify this? DoomsDay349 00:40, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Replied on the user's talk page. -- ReyBrujo 01:33, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
 * I understood that much, but what I was confused about was whether or not that was factual. Do you really have to be 18 or 21 or whatever to write on Wikipedia? DoomsDay349 20:19, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Replied on the user's talk page. -- ReyBrujo 20:26, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Thanks. I just got a little scared :). DoomsDay349 20:29, 19 September 2006 (UTC)

thanks
thanks for the clear advice about copyrightDGG 06:22, 19 September 2006 (UTC)

Twilight Princess boxart
Hey ReyBrujo,

What's up with all the tags to the Twilight Princess boxart? Is it good now?

greets JackSparrow Ninja 15:32, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Replied on the user's talk page. -- ReyBrujo 15:55, 19 September 2006 (UTC)

Thank You!

 * Replied on the user's talk page. -- ReyBrujo 21:38, 19 September 2006 (UTC)

Your removal of links in talk
You recently de-linked various links in Talk:Galactic Civilizations II: Dread Lords. I see no reason for doing so, and have reverted you, while preserving your header changes. If you intend to do this again, or to do it to other pages as I see you have been doing, please give a better explanation than "clean up web links log, thanks for understanding". I don't understand. GreenReaper 22:51, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Replied on the user's talk page. -- ReyBrujo 02:06, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Your position is clear, but I disagree with doing so on talk pages. Those links were used in the discussion of the articles concerned. Removing them makes it harder for subsequent readers to follow the conversation. I doubt that the intent of any of those in were to promote the article on behalf of the site itself, but to draw editors' attention to the story, which happened to be on that site. Given that intent, it seems "right" that the link remain, even if it results in benefit to that site. Moreover, just because a site is a popular news aggregator does not mean it cannot have original content as well. I know of several interviews that have occurred on Slashdot, for example. Would links to these be removed? In some cases, the discussion on a particular site may itself be worthy of linking. Where, exactly, do you draw the line? GreenReaper 14:42, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Replied on the user's talk page. -- ReyBrujo 17:10, 20 September 2006 (UTC)

Digg as a ref
Wouldn't a link to digg be reliable to prove that an article was linked from digg, as in OpenDNS? -- Tawker 01:19, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Replied on the user's talk page. -- ReyBrujo 02:05, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
 * But wasn't the sentence pointing out the fact that openDNS was listed on digg? -- Tawker 02:10, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Replied on the user's talk page. -- ReyBrujo 02:28, 20 September 2006 (UTC)

Invitation to WP:WPSPAM
Hey there! I saw you reverting or removing linkspam. Thanks! If you're interested, come visit us in WikiProject Spam so we can work together in our efforts to clean spam from Wikipedia. --AbsolutDan (talk) 01:54, 20 September 2006 (UTC)

Template:Extra chronology
This is now editable by you. Rgds, Rich Farmbrough, 21:29 20 September 2006 (GMT).

Brain Age
Yes, I definitely agree that BA is a highly successful franchise, but I think it's too new. A lot of articles that I thought would be important were rated lower than I expected, so I rate within the context of the articles already rated. For instance, in the handheld sections, most of them are mid-importance; to get a high rating, it seems, it has to be landmark, like Pokemon Red/Blue or Tetris (top importance). Most articles are just of mid-importance. If you still disagree, perhaps the CVG workshop will be there? I don't really nkow - I don't think there's a formal process for reviewing importance ratings. Hbdragon88 21:57, 20 September 2006 (UTC)

Signature Customization
Hey Rey. I'm attempting to add some color to my signature, kinda brighten it up a bit. I'm having trouble though, and I also can't find any page with instructions on how to do this. Can you help me? DoomsDay349 00:42, 21 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Replied on the user's talk page. -- ReyBrujo 18:33, 21 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Should I use raw sig or not? I don't quite understand that. DoomsDay349 20:22, 21 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Replied on the user's talk page. -- ReyBrujo 20:31, 21 September 2006 (UTC)
 * OK, so basically all I want to do is add color...any idea how to do that? DoomsDay349 20:37, 21 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Replied on the user's talk page. -- ReyBrujo 20:53, 21 September 2006 (UTC)
 * I got it mostly, only my talk page link color doesn't seem to be working...any ideas? DoomsDay  (talk) 20:58, 21 September 2006 (UTC)
 * I want to make it in red, btw. As you can see, it edits the parentheses around the talk link, not the link itself.  DoomsDay  (talk) 20:59, 21 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Replied on the user's talk page. -- ReyBrujo 21:06, 21 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Replied on the user's talk page. -- ReyBrujo 21:08, 21 September 2006 (UTC)
 * =P can't pick a good color can I? How's about purple? As for the parantheses problem, when I enter this  DoomsDay  (talk) I recieve this  DoomsDay  (talk), which is the parentheses colored as opposed to the talk page link.  DoomsDay  (talk) 21:13, 21 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Replied on the user's talk page. -- ReyBrujo 21:33, 21 September 2006 (UTC)
 * I decided to go with this Dooms  Day  349 .  Pretty nice, eh?  Dooms  Day  349  21:43, 21 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Made a small change, cause I joined Esperanza. Do you like it?  Dooms  Day  34  9  23:44, 21 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Replied on the user's talk page. -- ReyBrujo 00:35, 22 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Mmmmm I see. I'll be a fixin' then.  Dooms  Day  34  9  00:42, 22 September 2006 (UTC)
 * How's it look now? Dooms  Day34  9  00:43, 22 September 2006 (UTC)

My Editor review
Thank you very very much —Argentino (talk/cont.) 20:48, 22 September 2006 (UTC)

Gaming page link guidelines
Sorry about overdoing the link editing on Gran Turismo (video game) in killing the Moby Games link. Can you point me to any discussions or guidelines on criteria for external links in gaming articles? Any thoughts off-hand about linking game dedicated message boards? ENeville 18:36, 23 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Replied on the user's talk page. -- ReyBrujo 18:44, 23 September 2006 (UTC)

Hi!
You have been mysteriously nominated for adminship by RyanGerbil10! Go see them for details. Fastnaturedude 03:57, 24 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Replied on the user's talk page. -- ReyBrujo 04:07, 24 September 2006 (UTC)

Quick Question
Hey Rey. I'm working on the War of Souls trilogy and will soon have the majority of the Age of Mortals series novels, and I am curious: Do you have to read anything in the Dark Disciple Trilogy to understand Wizard's Conclave? Thanks. Dooms Day34  9  02:41, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Replied on the user's talk page. -- ReyBrujo 02:46, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Thanks. Dooms  Day34  9  02:44, 25 September 2006 (UTC)

DS image
I have given it the tag now. Have I done it correctly? Havok (T/C/c) 06:48, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Replied on the user's talk page. -- ReyBrujo 13:30, 26 September 2006 (UTC)

Mentos Eruption
Thanks for putting up that message about external links. Probably only the ones to about.com and others explaining how it works are necessary, don't you think? About the "related tricks" part. I think that the title of the section was not very good but I thought that it was interesting that other similar reactions exist. If it is treated more professionally do you think that it could be beneficial? (Toritaiyo 15:44, 26 September 2006 (UTC))
 * Replied on the user's talk page. -- ReyBrujo 15:59, 26 September 2006 (UTC)

Thanks (Toritaiyo 16:26, 3 October 2006 (UTC))

Istar
Hey Rey, I'm planning on writing an article on Istar (in dragonlance), and I want to know which books are good to write it, aside from the obvious Kingpriest Trilogy, which I do not own. I also have in my possession The Reign of Istar, in the Tales series. For the record, I will probably not be reading these books for a good time, as my current reading schedule is long and the Kingpriest is a bit farther down on the list. Dooms Day34  9  21:15, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Replied on the user's talk page. -- ReyBrujo 23:12, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Alright, thanks. I'll write the article soon as I have finished those books.  Dooms  Day34  9  01:38, 27 September 2006 (UTC)

Nexus
Question, for this our write-up on the Nexus, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dragonlance_Nexus, do we just need proof of it being in a seperate website like this: http://www.wizards.com/default.asp?x=dnd/we/20030822a ? --Kranar drogin 01:02, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Replied on the user's talk page. -- ReyBrujo 02:08, 28 September 2006 (UTC)

Verification of image
Hello ReyBrujo,

Can you tell me what the dispute is regarding the image on the page titled Burn FM? As a new user of wikipedia I'm unsure as to how I can verify the image myself.

Many thanks,

Ian Devlin 23:02, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Replied on the user's talk page. -- ReyBrujo 02:20, 29 September 2006 (UTC)

Zatch Bell
Are they really necessary? I mean, linking to images about every attack in the series, seeing the amount of characters and attacks, may not be appropriate. I am tempted to add a External links tag to the article, but will wait some days to see if there is a good reason for keeping them. -- ReyBrujo 23:23, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Please do so. --  Zanimum 19:57, 29 September 2006 (UTC)

Weird English grammar
Hola ReyBrujo, I saw your comment on Featured article candidates/0.999... and noticed that your English, which I have to say is very good, was slightly incorrect in the series of rhetorical questions you asked. In the phrase "Why we have featured articles about an anime character when only children know who he is?", the correct for would be "Why do we have...". I know, English can be stupid sometimes. Also, in "Why we have featured articles about a painting that probably very few know about its existence, lest see it?" I think you meant the last clause to be "much less see it". I don't mean to sound condescending, it's just that I would be grateful if someone corrected my Spanish on the Spanish-language Wikipedia. Overall, your knowledge of English vocabulary is extremely good; how long have you been speaking it? User:Supadawg (talk • contribs) 21:21, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Replied on the user's talk page. -- ReyBrujo 21:33, 29 September 2006 (UTC)

PUI discussion - re: iTV image
I've updated the discussion. After some consideration I believe the user, although I can see why you would have your doubts - he has uploaded a higher resolution version of the same image - and looking at the timestamp on the first upload of the image - it was uploaded to wikipedia before it was posted on the site you linked. A close inspection of the image, also gives away it's domestic rather than professional origins. If you don't have any objections I will de-list this image from WP:PUI in about 24 hours. Regards Megapixie 18:29, 30 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Replied on the user's talk page. -- ReyBrujo 18:35, 30 September 2006 (UTC)