User talk:Reyk/Archive11

LGBT articles of Brazil
Hello! Brazilian people love U.S. citizens. Many flights from TX, CA, FL, NY, and GE to Brazil exists. You are very welcome. In FEBRUARY, in the Supreme Federal Court of Brazil will be aproved the *SAME-SEX MARRIAGE IN BRAZIL*, and the pages LGBT rights in Brazil and Recognition of same-sex unions in Brazil need of you. Because will generate a heavy traffic on these pages, and we need you to help in the English spelling of these pages, you understand me? Please help me. Hentzer (talk) 23:00, 23 January 2011 (UTC)
 * I'm sorry, but I no longer edit Wikipedia. Reyk  YO!  01:03, 25 January 2011 (UTC)

The Downlink: Issue 2

 * You have recieved this newsletter because you are currently listed as a member of WikiProject Spaceflight, or because you are not a member but have requested it. If you do not wish to receive future issues, please add your name to the opt-out list.

Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of WikiProject Spaceflight at 00:50, 2 February 2011 (UTC).

Welcome back
Hi Reyk. I don't believe we've had any interactions but I've noticed your comments at ANI a few times and was always agreed with them, what's more you impressed me with you calm reasoned response on more than one occasion. I was saddened to see you leave the project and am glad to see you back. So Welcome Back! Worm  TT   08:50, 20 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Thanks! I was feeling pretty worn out for a while, but a month long semi-break has done me some good I think. Reyk  YO!  09:18, 20 February 2011 (UTC)

Multiple articles on fictional characters
Makes me wanna ask, what do you say about having separate articles like Wikipedia has the TV series version of Temperance Brennan and her book series counterpart or Yuusuke Godai and Yuusuke Onodera? Should this be tolerated for non-Transformers stuff? NotARealWord (talk) 16:00, 3 March 2011 (UTC)
 * See WP:OTHERCRAPEXISTS. And yes, I do think more than one article per character is generally too much- not just for Transformers articles. Reyk  YO!  05:12, 4 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Where were people like you when I asked to merge the two Yuusukes? NotARealWord (talk) 06:45, 4 March 2011 (UTC)
 * That's always the conundrum, isn't it? The people who hang around fictional characters' talk pages are usually diehard fans who think it's super duper mega important to go on at great lengths about minutiae, and try to justify multiple pages on essentially the same thing. Try suggesting any sort of cleanup or maintenance, and you're set upon by hordes of indignant fanboys. But people with a proper perspective miss things like your proposal because they're just not aware of them.  Reyk  YO!  09:14, 4 March 2011 (UTC)
 * My suggestion was put up on Proposed mergers last year. Seriously, it would be nice if there was a more organized way to propose merges. That page is just "list down anything that you think should be merged". If everybody who wanted to merge some articles used that page, it's likely to get overly cluttered. We really need a more organized merge-proposal process. NotARealWord (talk) 22:43, 4 March 2011 (UTC)

Talkback
Just a wee comment... SchuminWeb (Talk) 04:24, 4 March 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of season one episode articles of House for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the articles Paternity (House), Occam's Razor (House), Maternity (House), Damned If You Do, The Socratic Method (House), Fidelity (House), Poison (House), DNR (House), Histories (House), Detox (House), Sports Medicine (House), Cursed (House), Control (House), Mob Rules (House), Heavy (House), Role Model (House), Babies & Bathwater, Kids (House), Love Hurts (House) and Honeymoon (House) are suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Paternity (House) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article.  X  eworlebi (talk) 14:49, 4 March 2011 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from, SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 00:35, 21 March 2011 (UTC)

AfD: Cort Webber and Bobby "Fatboy" Roberts
This is a courtesy notice given your prior involvement with Articles for deletion/Cort and Fatboy or its deletion review (Deletion review/Log/2011 April 10) that these related articles are currently listed at AfD at Articles for deletion/Cort Webber. As attribution issues are involved, closure of this current AfD may result in the restoration of the earlier article, as a list of contributors would be necessary if the articles are retained. Moonriddengirl (talk) 13:56, 18 May 2011 (UTC)

A new word?
- not heard that before, is it your invention? pablo 05:58, 22 May 2011 (UTC)
 * I think so. Reyk  YO!  20:39, 22 May 2011 (UTC)

New resolution proposal
Hi. Just wanted to let you know that a new proposal has been made in a thread you contributed to at AN/I concerning the possibility of prohibiting a user from initiating actions at AN, AN/I, or WQA. Thanks, –  OhioStandard  (talk) 06:50, 24 May 2011 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:WikiWitch (second nomination)
Hi Reyk. I apologize for my accidental removal of your comment. I don't know how that happened. Cunard (talk) 23:47, 29 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Don't worry about it. I figured it was a software glitch or something. Reyk  YO!  23:49, 29 May 2011 (UTC)

Arbitration
You are involved in a recently filed request for arbitration. Please review the request at Arbitration/Requests and, if you wish to do so, enter your statement and any other material you wish to submit to the Arbitration Committee. Additionally, the following resources may be of use—
 * Arbitration/Requests;
 * Arbitration guide.

Thanks,OpenInfoForAll (talk) 22:45, 13 September 2011 (UTC)


 * I'm not involved, and I don't care. Reyk  YO!  00:11, 14 September 2011 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Human
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Human. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! However, please note that your input will carry no greater weight than anyone else's: remember that an RFC aims to reach a reasoned consensus position, and is not a vote. In support of that, your contribution should focus on thoughtful evaluation of the issues and available evidence, and provide further relevant evidence if possible.

''You have received this notice because your name is on Feedback request service. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from that page.'' RFC&#32;bot (talk) 07:38, 11 October 2011 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Metrication in the United Kingdom
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Metrication in the United Kingdom. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! However, please note that your input will carry no greater weight than anyone else's: remember that an RFC aims to reach a reasoned consensus position, and is not a vote. In support of that, your contribution should focus on thoughtful evaluation of the issues and available evidence, and provide further relevant evidence if possible.

''You have received this notice because your name is on Feedback request service. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from that page.'' RFC&#32;bot (talk) 08:18, 17 October 2011 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Color
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Color. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! However, please note that your input will carry no greater weight than anyone else's: remember that an RFC aims to reach a reasoned consensus position, and is not a vote. In support of that, your contribution should focus on thoughtful evaluation of the issues and available evidence, and provide further relevant evidence if possible.

''You have received this notice because your name is on Feedback request service. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from that page.'' RFC&#32;bot (talk) 09:17, 23 October 2011 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Ejaculation
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Ejaculation. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! However, please note that your input will carry no greater weight than anyone else's: remember that an RFC aims to reach a reasoned consensus position, and is not a vote. In support of that, your contribution should focus on thoughtful evaluation of the issues and available evidence, and provide further relevant evidence if possible.

''You have received this notice because your name is on Feedback request service. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from that page.'' RFC&#32;bot (talk) 11:16, 29 October 2011 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Quotation mark
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Quotation mark. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! However, please note that your input will carry no greater weight than anyone else's: remember that an RFC aims to reach a reasoned consensus position, and is not a vote. In support of that, your contribution should focus on thoughtful evaluation of the issues and available evidence, and provide further relevant evidence if possible.

''You have received this notice because your name is on Feedback request service. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from that page.'' RFC&#32;bot (talk) 12:16, 4 November 2011 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Katrina Kaif
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Katrina Kaif. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! However, please note that your input will carry no greater weight than anyone else's: remember that an RFC aims to reach a reasoned consensus position, and is not a vote. In support of that, your contribution should focus on thoughtful evaluation of the issues and available evidence, and provide further relevant evidence if possible.

''You have received this notice because your name is on Feedback request service. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from that page.'' RFC&#32;bot (talk) 13:17, 10 November 2011 (UTC)

File:Half-der.PNG listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Half-der.PNG, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 20:38, 19 November 2011 (UTC)

RFA thanks
Thank you for your question, comnent, and support at my recent successful RFA. Being now the new fellow in the fraternity of administrators, I will do my best to live up to the confidence shown in me by others, will move slowly and carefully when using the mop, will seek input from others before any action of which I might be unsure, and will try not to break anything beyond repair. Best,  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 19:10, 4 December 2011 (UTC)

Articles for deletion/Death Valley Driver Video Review (6th nomination)
Hi Reyk. Do you understand [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3AArticles_for_deletion%2FDeath_Valley_Driver_Video_Review_(6th_nomination)&diff=465722518 this comment] by ? I don't, so I am unable to formulate a response. Goodvac (talk) 23:22, 13 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Sorry, I can't help you. I don't understand that comment either. You should ask DF to clarify. Reyk  YO!  00:04, 14 December 2011 (UTC)

Administrators' noticeboard
Hi Reyk. You participated in Administrators' noticeboard/Archive228, in which a one-month topic ban on creating new articles and making page moves was imposed on. The closing admin has asked for community input about whether to remove the topic ban or make it indefinite at Administrators' noticeboard. Cunard (talk) 09:00, 16 December 2011 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:Noticeboard for India-related topics
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Noticeboard for India-related topics. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — RFC&#32;bot (talk) 11:18, 21 December 2011 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Thermodynamic equilibrium
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Thermodynamic equilibrium. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — RFC&#32;bot (talk) 12:15, 27 December 2011 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Highways
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Highways. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — RFC&#32;bot (talk) 13:15, 2 January 2012 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Creation and evolution in public education
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Creation and evolution in public education. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — RFC&#32;bot (talk) 14:15, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:ISO 2852
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:ISO 2852. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — RFC&#32;bot (talk) 15:15, 14 January 2012 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Daemon (computing)
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Daemon (computing). Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — RFC&#32;bot (talk) 16:15, 20 January 2012 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Renewable energy
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Renewable energy. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — RFC&#32;bot (talk) 17:15, 26 January 2012 (UTC)

Being undignified is ok by me.
At least its honest. Cheers.--Milowent • hasspoken 01:00, 28 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Well, I realized after I wrote it that that amount of gloating is completely unwarranted. I'll content myself with just a little smirk. Reyk  YO!  10:10, 28 January 2012 (UTC)

Requests for comment/F&aelig;
A request for comments has been opened on administrator User:F&aelig;. You are being notified due to your prior participation in ANI, RfA, or RfC discussions regarding this user. Thank you, MadmanBot (talk) 19:57, 28 January 2012 (UTC)

Arbitration Committee RfC
I have started one at Requests for comment/Arbitration Committee 3. If you would like to add yourself as a certifying party and perhaps make a statement, it would be appreciated. Also, if you would like to change the formatting a bit, please feel free. This is my first RfC creation and this also isn't a common type of RfC, so I used a generalized format. Silver seren C 23:45, 28 January 2012 (UTC)
 * How exactly do you list an RfC? I've never done it before and i'm not sure where it goes. Silver  seren C 00:36, 29 January 2012 (UTC)
 * I'm not 100% sure; I have never started an RfC either. There's some instructions here. Reyk  YO!  03:27, 29 January 2012 (UTC)