User talk:Rezachan7

Speedy deletion nomination of Qlake
Hello Rezachan7,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Qlake for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Esquivalience t 19:55, 16 February 2015 (UTC)

February 2015
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but in this recent edit you removed a speedy deletion tag from Qlake, a page you have created yourself. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the page's talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. Excirial ( Contact me, Contribs ) 20:51, 16 February 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Qlake


The article Qlake has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Doesn't appear to meet WP:NSOFT. No assertion of any sort of notability; no third-party sources; and nothing relevant found with an admittedly-cursory search.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. &mdash;Cryptic 20:57, 16 February 2015 (UTC)