User talk:Rezavandi

Speedy deletion of General definition for freedom
A tag has been placed on General definition for freedom requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lordjeff06 15:22, 10 November 2007 (UTC)

Copyright problems
Hello. Concerning your contribution, General definition for freedom, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material without the permission of the author. As a copyright violation, General definition for freedom appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. General definition for freedom has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. For text material, please consider rewriting the content and citing the source, provided that it is credible.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:


 * If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at Talk:General definition for freedom and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
 * If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:General definition for freedom with a link to where we can find that note.
 * If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:General definition for freedom.

However, for text content, you may want to consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you, and please feel free to continue contributing to Wikipedia. RMHED 23:43, 10 November 2007 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of General definition for democracy
A tag has been placed on General definition for democracy requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must include on the external site the statement "I, (name), am the author of this article, (article name), and I release its content under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 and later." You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Гed ʃ t ǁ c ɭ 00:01, 11 November 2007 (UTC)

Copyright problems
Hello. Concerning your contribution, General definition for freedom, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material without the permission of the author. As a copyright violation, General definition for freedom appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. General definition for freedom has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. For text material, please consider rewriting the content and citing the source, provided that it is credible.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:


 * If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at Talk:General definition for freedom and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
 * If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:General definition for freedom with a link to where we can find that note.
 * If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:General definition for freedom.

However, for text content, you may want to consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you, and please feel free to continue contributing to Wikipedia. ArglebargleIV 00:51, 11 November 2007 (UTC)

November 2007
Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Giles Bennett (Talk, Contribs) 21:14, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
 * I suggest you read WP:What Wikipedia is not before continuing to introduce inappropriate pages to Wikipedia. This page has now been deleted four times. Please stop reintroducing it. Giles Bennett (Talk, Contribs) 21:15, 14 November 2007 (UTC)

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. The next time you create an inappropriate page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Giles Bennett (Talk, Contribs) 21:29, 14 November 2007 (UTC)

Blocked
You have now recreated the page General definition for freedom numerous times despite explanations of why it is not appropriate for Wikipedia. I've blocked this account from editing indefinitely. If you wish to appeal the block, you can follow the instructions at WP:APPEAL. MastCell Talk 21:31, 14 November 2007 (UTC)