User talk:Rezonansowy/Archive 2

Venus Project
concerning The Venus Project:

Please use google or another search engine to locate the copyright information on "The Venus Project" associated with Venus, Florida, United States; and Jacque Fresco, Roxanne Meadows.

There, you will quickly find that there are two organizations known as "The Venus Project" - one is nonprofit (venusproject.org) and another is for-profit/commercial (thevenusproject.com).

The page for The Venus Project is for the FOR-profit, commercial organization; which engages in merchandising while not being a 501(c)(3) non-profit -- therefore, it is a for-profit organization. They are selling hopes and dreams and pretty pictures and youtube videos.

Not a humanitarian organization. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Xan81 (talk • contribs) 21:43, 4 September 2013 (UTC)
 * OK. thevenusproject.com is not venusproject.org, but there is not nothing like a "For-profit Organization". So, what now?--Rezonansowy (talk &bull;&#32; contribs) 21:59, 4 September 2013 (UTC)


 * The next part of our discussion will be on Talk:The Venus Project. --Rezonansowy (talk &bull;&#32; contribs) 14:26, 5 September 2013 (UTC)


 * Resxonansowy, please stop re-adding things to Venus Project page that are long and uncited information blocks of material from Venus Project itself. Wikipedia articles are not blogs where primary sources are displayed as information giving for organizations. Earl King Jr. (talk) 23:32, 5 September 2013 (UTC)

Ehh, The next part of our discussion will be on Talk:The Venus Project. Please do not post here. --Rezonansowy (talk &bull;&#32; contribs) 08:55, 7 September 2013 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:Watch-recordings-fanart.png)
Thanks for uploading File:Watch-recordings-fanart.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Werieth (talk) 00:47, 9 September 2013 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Templatedata
Template:Templatedata has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Rezonansowy (talk &bull;&#32; contribs) 20:52, 12 September 2013 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Infobox artist module
Template:Infobox artist module has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. eh bien mon prince (talk) 10:02, 23 September 2013 (UTC)

Infobox artist module robocoby from 2013-24-09
--Rezonansowy (talk &bull;&#32; contribs) 10:54, 24 September 2013 (UTC)

Free software portal design
The 'Edit' links no longer work on the Free Software portal since you changed the design in the free software portal. diff - Frap (talk) 09:02, 29 September 2013 (UTC)
 * OK, thank you. I'll try to fix it when have some time. --Rezonansowy (talk &bull;&#32; contribs) 11:56, 29 September 2013 (UTC)
 * --Rezonansowy (talk &bull;&#32; contribs) 12:34, 30 September 2013 (UTC)

Template:Bananas
Is there some reason why Template:Bananas exists? Note that there is a real template Banana. Peter coxhead (talk) 18:22, 17 October 2013 (UTC)
 * I know. Well, this was tobe a showcase template, like Module:Bananas, showing abilities of the parser-functions. But I was unable to do this properly. --Rezonansowy (talk &bull;&#32; contribs) 09:59, 1 November 2013 (UTC)

--Rezonansowy (talk &bull;&#32; contribs) | 11:39, 5 November 2013 (UTC)

Your requested move of a category
Regarding [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requested_moves/Technical_requests&diff=580602022&oldid=580586131 this request], I have declined the requested move of. Please take this to WP:Categories for discussion. See the heading for 'C2'. The 'Move' tab doesn't work for categories. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 18:01, 7 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Thanks, good to know. --Rezonansowy (talk &bull;&#32; contribs) 20:59, 7 November 2013 (UTC)

OS family
Hello, we've been reverted on Ubuntu (operating system) regarding the Infobox OS family field. I would suggest making a change to the template documentation if this is standard across other Linux OS articles, because consensus has been built through common use. disagrees. Elizium23 (talk) 22:39, 7 November 2013 (UTC)


 * Yes, that's a widely used standard and documentation may need the clarification. Let's start a new thread on Template talk:Infobox OS. --Rezonansowy (talk &bull;&#32; contribs) 23:00, 7 November 2013 (UTC)


 * Our thread is available on Template_talk:Infobox_OS. --Rezonansowy (talk &bull;&#32; contribs) 23:15, 7 November 2013 (UTC)

Opting in to VisualEditor
As you may know, VisualEditor ("Edit beta") is currently available on the English Wikipedia only for registered editors who choose to enable it. Since you have made 100 or more edits with VisualEditor this year, I want to make sure that you know that you can enable VisualEditor (if you haven't already done so) by going to your preferences and choosing the item, " ". This will give you the option of using VisualEditor on articles and userpages when you want to, and give you the opportunity to spot changes in the interface and suggest improvements. We value your feedback, whether positive or negative, about using VisualEditor, at VisualEditor/Feedback. Thank you, Whatamidoing (WMF) (talk) 18:24, 11 October 2013 (UTC)


 * Got it, thanks. --Rezonansowy (talk &bull;&#32; contribs) 13:42, 8 November 2013 (UTC)

Template:Microsoft Windows family
Hi.

How do you do? I hope I am not catching you in a bad time but I wanted to have a chat about recent edits in Template:Microsoft Windows family.

First, about the boldface. We actually do have a guideline: WP:BOLDFACE. Boldface is about attracting attention. But footer is for reducing attention and anything that makes footer stand out is detrimental to its purpose; so links in the footer should not be bold. People by mistake make those links bold because they always see them in boldface in portal boxes and titles, where they mean to attract attention. This is not the case here. Often, when I explain it to them, they let it be. So, if you saw any bold footers, unbold them.

Second, about the repeated links. I know you feel the link is important but navboxes are at the very bottom of the page, where they must attract the least attention. For this reason, in navboxes, redirects that go to the same place as the link right next to them only adds to clutter.

Best regards, Codename Lisa (talk) 04:15, 14 November 2013 (UTC)


 * Hi, Thank you for asking, it is always a good time to talk :)


 * I think not everything has to be wrapped in a rule, IMO Wikipedia has become a little bureaucratic. I try to keep this bolding, because almost all templates have bold in below standard links: Category, Project, Book. Bolding is only for standard links, but not for others, so it is used to highlight them. I assure you, that's not a mistake or my opinion, just a grassroots standard. I hope you see this now.


 * Concerning redirects. Navboxes are templates which helps with navigation, it's like improved See also. They contain lists with wikilinked items. These links are important, not because my opinion, they may be in the same article but are separate things and should be covered in list. --Rezonansowy (talk &bull; contribs) 14:21, 14 November 2013 (UTC)


 * Hi. You are welcome.


 * I am sorry, I am not sure if I understand your point about bold links. You say other templates have bold links in the footer. Well, maybe they shouldn't, unless they have a rationale. These links already have a glowing background and icons. What more attention do they need? And there is something more: What do portals and categories have? Links. People who click on the portal and category links end up getting the same links, plus more clutter. So, clicking on these links must be discouraged.


 * About navboxes, well you have a good point there but there are other realities too:
 * 1. Why this redirect and not ten others like Windows Mobile 2003 SE?
 * 2. There is also the opposite: Why should a person who has read Windows Mobile should click on Pocket PC 2000?
 * 3. There was a case once about an Opera-related navbox. (Back then I was not an editor yet.) Someone made a list like this: Opera (1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10). Now Opera (web browser) and [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Opera_10&oldid=563672820 Opera 10] were two separate articles. But 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 and 9 weren't. Someone showed some chart that this actually reduced visits to Opera 10 article and all other redirects after "1" because people thought they are not actual articles. So, the person who has visited Pocket PC 2000 redirect is discouraged from clicking on Pocket PC 2002.


 * Look, rules don't always bring about bureaucracy; bad rules do that. Good rules bring about order, which is good.


 * Best regards,
 * Codename Lisa (talk) 07:42, 15 November 2013 (UTC)


 * I'm not sure if I'm the right person to discuss about this alone, is very uncomfortable when defending something, which is not only my opinion. I'm little confuse when I'm alone on something like this (bold links), can we open a RfC request for it (so others to be declared)? Thank you for understanding me. --Rezonansowy (talk &bull; contribs) 09:51, 15 November 2013 (UTC)


 * Hi. You are welcome. But RFC is too much at this point. Please give it a day, and then call a WP:3O first before resorting to an RFC.


 * Best regards,
 * Codename Lisa (talk) 10:11, 15 November 2013 (UTC)


 * OK, so I've only to wait. --Rezonansowy (talk &bull; contribs) 10:15, 15 November 2013 (UTC)

Double image template deletion discussion
Hey friend, excuse my french & nothing at all personal but: time to shut that sh*t DOWN! are you in a bubble as to what kind of mess is going on? some pages are embarrassingly affected merely by this "discussion"! with all best intentions in mind: learn to walk away from a mistake! anyone whose ever badmouthed wikipedia now has more fuel. Japanglish (talk) 13:28, 15 November 2013 (UTC)


 * O, I think you mean Templates for discussion/Log/2013 November 7. Don't blame me, Wikipedia doesn't need three same templates. I see this mess, template double image has about 2,500 transluctions, so best solution will be mark this template as obsolete for now. --Rezonansowy (talk &bull; contribs) 14:21, 15 November 2013 (UTC)

Gabriel Yuji

Please notice ip 111.243.0.198, 114.39.7.129
Hi ,Rezonansowy, ip user  111.243.0.198 and ip 114.39.7.129 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/111.243.0.198  , https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/114.39.7.129, Vandalism a lot of articles , please stop these ip user , thank you MBINISIDLERS (talk) 09:04, 23 November 2013 (UTC)

Reference Errors on 26 November
Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. as follows: Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/RBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/RBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=ReferenceBot%20–%20&section=new report it to my operator]. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:19, 27 November 2013 (UTC)
 * On the Notification area page, [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=583448817 your edit] caused a broken reference name (help) . ([ Fix] | [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&preload=User:ReferenceBot/helpform&preloadtitle=Referencing%20errors%20on%20Notification area Ask for help])

A reference problem
Hi! Some users have been working hard on Category:Pages with broken reference names.

Here you added a new reference chenBlog but didn't define it. This has been showing as an error at the bottom of the article. " Cite error: The named reference  was invoked but never defined (see the help page). " Can you take a look and work out what you were trying to do? Thanks -- Frze > talk  09:43, 27 November 2013 (UTC)


 * Hi, I agree with, but this was a quick moving of some content, so just I didn't check it. But thanks. --Rezonansowy (talk &bull; contribs) 13:54, 27 November 2013 (UTC)

File:Office logo (Pre-2003).png
Hi.

Following our disagreement on File:Office logo (Pre-2003).png licensing term, I sent it to content review for analysis. In the meantime, however, I think it is safer to keep it marked as non-free until proven otherwise. Safe because if it is non-free, it might go to Commons and get deleted once, which is bad.

By the way, public domain logos are marked with PD-logo, not PD-shape.

Best regards, Codename Lisa (talk) 20:44, 3 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Sure. --Rezonansowy (talk &bull; contribs) 21:23, 3 December 2013 (UTC)

LaTeX example file
The old file no longer correspond to the LaTeX example in the article. You cannot just put the old file back, you must change the latex example as well. What particularly do you not like about the new file? PNG format? Resolution? Bakkedal (talk) 13:57, 7 December 2013 (UTC)
 * I'm not a latex expert, so I can't do anything in this issue. Secondly, we don't need two files with same content, SVG would be much more appropriate than PNG. --Rezonansowy (talk &bull; contribs) 15:18, 7 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Ok, I will make an SVG version of the file.Bakkedal (talk) 14:00, 8 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Great, thank you, this will help. --Rezonansowy (talk &bull; contribs) 17:25, 8 December 2013 (UTC)

Xbox One logo
Please stop changing the license of the image, it is too complex to be eligible as a PD image and would be deleted if moved to Commons. It is a non-free image that is copyrighted and trademarked. If you continue to disruptively change image licenses without consensus you may be blocked. —Locke Cole • t • c 00:58, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Hello, have you read my edit summary in file history? File has been approved on Commons, see Commons:COM:Village pump. --Rezonansowy (talk &bull; contribs) 01:04, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Yes, I read that discussion and there was a consensus there that the image was NOT free. —Locke Cole • t • c 01:17, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Locke Cole, we're not thinking it's free, but PD-inelegible. It doesn't matter if file is free in this case. --Rezonansowy (talk &bull; contribs) 01:23, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Nobody there (except you) thinks it is eligible for a free license, PD or otherwise. It is a copyrighted logo. —Locke Cole • t • c 01:32, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
 * I'm sorry, but you don't understand that copyright or free licensing have nothing to do with the Threshold of originality. Besides you're wrong, Saffron Blaze agreed. --Rezonansowy (talk &bull; contribs) 14:10, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
 * When something is not eligible for a free license and is eligible for copyright, it has met the threshold of originality. And you are wrong. Saffron Blaze did not agree: "Both images have stylized elements that would seem to depart significantly from being just a textlogo. Saffron Blaze ( talk ) 16:10, 8 December 2013 (UTC)". —Locke Cole • t • c 18:08, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
 * O, you're right, sorry my mistake. Next part of this discussion will be there, on Commons:COM:Village pump. --Rezonansowy (talk &bull; contribs) 10:55, 10 December 2013 (UTC)

Feathercoin copy?
Hi I noticed you wanted to keep the Feathercoin article. Do you happen to have a copy somewhere? I'm on a mission to rescue coin related WP articles about to be deleted by copying them to coinwiki.info, but I was a bit too late with FTC :/ Guaka (talk) 17:24, 24 December 2013 (UTC)


 * Hi, you can request a copy of deleted articles here. They'll probably appear as your subpage. --Rezonansowy (talk &bull; contribs) 22:13, 24 December 2013 (UTC)

Pinging other users
Hi, re : I didn't get a notification - it's explained at Village pump (technical)/Archive 121 - the ping and your signature need to be added with the same edit. I actually found that page when running through recent changes to User:AnomieBOT/PERTable. -- Red rose64 (talk) 00:38, 30 December 2013 (UTC)

TWL Thanks
Hey, thanks for cleaning up my clumsy design code. I just tweaked the news background a bit. Happy to discuss and so glad to have your input. If you are interetsed in doing more design work, please let me know! Cheers, Jake Ocaasit &#124; c 15:01, 26 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Hi, thanks for thanks. Sorry for delayed reply, but I missed this thread in my talk page. I think I'll be a freelancer in doing my work, but maybe in future I'll become a regular designer. I hope I do my work well. --Rezonansowy (talk &bull; contribs) 14:13, 2 January 2014 (UTC)

Happy New Year
So 2013 ended with many ups and downs, starting from the release of blockbuster movies, new OSs, gadgets, cars and bikes, improve in social networking etc to meeting new friends, improving our editing skills, forming new groups.

But it also brought sad movements like the death of Paul Walker, Nelson Mandela to Cyclones like Phailin, Haiyan etc.

Finally, I'd like to conclude that several ups and downs are must in every year but we must be fearless and have faith in divine.

HAPPY NEW YEAR 2014.

By

Himanis Das (Talk, Facebook me, Tweet me) 17:54, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Thanks, Happy New Year to you, as well. --Rezonansowy (talk &bull; contribs) 18:54, 3 January 2014 (UTC)

AutoPortals
I've given a response to your question at Lua requests (I'd say I'm sorry I didn't see it sooner, except actually, I hadn't realized the power of frame:preprocess until just recently). Wnt (talk) 05:06, 4 January 2014 (UTC)
 * OK, thank you for reply. Hope this will work. --Rezonansowy (talk &bull; contribs) 10:17, 4 January 2014 (UTC)

Edit Warring - Bitcoin Article
you are un-doing a lot of edits by myself and - at least four in the past 24 hours - this goes against the 3 reverts rule Edit_warring - Both Chris and myself are top 10 editors of the bitcoin article and we generally don't make changes unless they are warranted. Although we aren't perfect (I'm surely not) it seems highly unlikely there would be four changes that we've made within 24 hours that need to be reverted. Further, its extremely unlikely that both of us would remove the same content unless it was bad. Please contact us on our talk pages in future before reverting our changes - I'm open to being wrong, and I will more than revert my own change (a better way to do it) if there are issues with it. VinceSamios (talk) 11:22, 8 January 2014 (UTC)
 * If I revert something it means in my opinion the edit may require talk. I do my edits in good faith and just forgot about 24 hours. Thank you for telling me about it. --Rezonansowy (talk &bull; contribs) 21:48, 8 January 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 7
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Control panel (computer), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Printers and Firewall. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:45, 7 January 2015 (UTC)
 * ✅ --Rezonansowy (talk | contribs) 19:17, 7 January 2015 (UTC)