User talk:Rezonansowy/Archive 3

SimpleLightBox Enhancement
Hi,

I made one enhancement to SimpleLightbox- when you click on the image itself, it links you to the corresponding file: page that has all the fancy bells and whistles about the image. Apart from that it does a little cleanup and doesn't change the actual functionality of the script. (Note, to close the image, you'd just click anywhere outside the image. Here's the code:

Best, -- Kangaroo  powah  05:42, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Bump. -- Kangaroo  powah  02:45, 11 January 2014 (UTC)

Hi, sorry for delayed reply and thanks for great idea. I have one suggestion, sometimes on lower screen resolution (like in my comp) image displayed in this lightbox are very big and there's no space outside the image and to close it I often click on the image. Maybe instead of this we can insert a link for images like in MediaWiki's new Media Viewer. What do you think about it? --Rezonansowy (talk &bull; contribs) 08:00, 11 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Perhaps that instead of having a link to the image, we could instead have a close button in the top right corner of the image, like Media View has, which would let the lightbox be closed on smaller screens. Best, -- Kangaroo  powah  19:50, 11 January 2014 (UTC)

Your opinion on new standards for cryptocurrency is needed.
Since you seem to be heavily involved in the area, I would like your opinion on potential new standards regarding altcoins on Wikipedia. You can find the debate at Talk:Cryptocurrency. Best regards, Citation Needed  &#x007C;  Talk  20:15, 11 January 2014 (UTC)

Move of Asm.js
...to User:Asm.js (and the talk page). It didn't warn you I've CSDed it. Regards, Widefox ; talk 18:44, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
 * O, it was only my mistake, sorry about that. --Rezonansowy (talk &bull; contribs) 23:03, 16 January 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Cryptourrencies
A tag has been placed on Category:Cryptourrencies, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

My own mistake Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Rezonansowy (talk &bull; contribs) 13:56, 19 January 2014 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

 * Everything rotten was my fault, and now mr. DSNR is, together with mr. LondonLinux, blocked for sockpuppetry. Will I be happy and proud? No way! I like to enjoy Wikipedia too and his actions were not really helpful for that.
 * Even worse, he gave me the idea that you were a wingman and/or a meatpuppet, so I included you in the sockpuppet investigation too.
 * The check user revealed that you were by no means attached to mr. DSNR, so hereby I apologize for my suspicion and inclusion of you in the SPI. The Banner talk 04:01, 18 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Anyway thanks for it! --Rezonansowy (talk &bull; contribs) 14:53, 22 January 2014 (UTC)

Thank You

 * Thanks! So glad that my work has sense. --Rezonansowy (talk &bull; contribs) 14:53, 22 January 2014 (UTC)

Your Wikiball
I just want to let you know that I fixed your Wikiballl. Now it is completely covering the other one. If you did no want this or do not like the way I did it, please feel free to yell at me. Please reply on my talk page. Thanks! -Pending (tell me I screwed up  21:37, 22 January 2014 (UTC)  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pending (talk • contribs)

"Web properties" vs. "Internet services"
Hi.

MSDN and TechNet are not services, so "Internet services" does not apply to them. Both are communities + portals. Also MSN started its work as a service but it is now just a web portal.

Best regards, Codename Lisa (talk)
 * OK, self-revert for now. --Rezonansowy (talk &bull; contribs) 10:51, 23 January 2014 (UTC)

Venus Project talk-page
Hi, I'm messaging you as one of three most recent talk-page contributors to The_Venus_Project. I seem to be having difficulty reaching a consensus with another editor on the talk-page at Talk:The_Venus_Project. In case the article might not be on your watchlist and you might still be interested in the topic, I wanted to bring the discussion to your attention (in the hopes of getting a third, informed opinion). Best, startswithj (talk) 05:04, 27 January 2014 (UTC)

Infobox OS
Quick reminder, your "merge" proposal for Template:Infobox OS was closed as SoFixIt: Maybe remove your proposal if you changed your mind. I stumbled over it on GPAC Project on Advanced Content, tested Infobox software, and quickly reverted to Infobox OS for this software, because I wasn't interested to figure out how the OS parameters have to be renamed for software. –89.204.135.237 (talk) 03:29, 29 January 2014 (UTC)
 * I'll try to edit it myself, but it wasn't closed as SoFixIt which rather applies to articles not templates and I can't remove my entry from there. Anyway, thank you for info! --Rezonansowy (talk &bull; contribs) 15:44, 29 January 2014 (UTC)

Template:DraftChecker
There is a discussion at Template talk:DraftChecker that you maybe interested in. Thank you.--TriiipleThreat (talk) 14:59, 3 February 2014 (UTC)

Deleted picture: File:Microsoft Visual Studio 2012 BG.png
Hello,

Why is my picture deleted? I took a snapshot of my own VS running. Could you tell me where I am wrong, please?

Regards. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tihomir Arahangelov (talk • contribs) 23:57, 7 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Hello, on Wikimedia Commons non-free images are not allowed without permission. Please see Commons:COM:Copyright. However on Wikipedia image depicting this software is allowed, but only one in a low resolution, see Microsoft Visual Studio. That's why because Wikipedia and other projects are made to contain only free licensed material. If you have more questions, I invite you to Help desk or Teahouse and on Commons - Commons:COM:Help desk.

Regards. --Rezonansowy (talk &bull; contribs) 00:13, 8 February 2014 (UTC)

Verifiability
Hi Rezonansowy,

You reverted my removal of material with a message "It's not subject to citation". Everything is subject to citation. From Verifiability:

"All material in Wikipedia mainspace, including everything in articles, lists and captions, must be verifiable. All quotations, and any material whose verifiability has been challenged or is likely to be challenged, must include an inline citation that directly supports the material. Any material that needs a source but does not have one may be removed. "

I applied that "citation needed" template weeks ago as a challenge to the verifiability of the statement. No citation has been forthcoming therefore the statement is subject to removal. If you find a reliable source to cite for that statement, feel free to reinsert it. Until then

"Sometimes editors will disagree on whether material is verifiable. The burden of evidence lies with the editor who adds or restores material, and is satisfied by providing a reliable source that directly supports the material."

Thanks,

Chris Arnesen 01:55, 12 February 2014 (UTC)
 * OK, I restored it with a proper citation. --Rezonansowy (talk &bull; contribs) 10:18, 12 February 2014 (UTC)

Feedback needed on using special characters
Hello. Thank you for using VisualEditor! Having editors use it is the best way for the Wikimedia Foundation to develop it into the best tool it can be.

While we always welcome general feedback (please report any issues in Bugzilla in the "VisualEditor" product or drop your feedback on the central feedback page on MediaWiki.org), the developers are especially interested right now in feedback on the special character inserter. This new tool is used for inserting special characters (including symbols like ₥, IPA pronunciation symbols, mathematics symbols, and characters with diacritics). It is intended to help people whose computers do not have good character inserters. For example, many Mac users prefer to use the extensive "Special Characters..." tool present at the bottom of the Edit menu in all applications or to learn the keyboard shortcuts for characters like ñ and ü.

The current version of the special characters tool in VisualEditor is very simple and very basic. It will be getting a lot of work in the coming weeks and months. It does not contain very many character sets at this time. (The specific character sets can be customized at each Wikipedia, so that each project could have a local version with the characters it wants.) But the developers want your ideas at this early stage about ways that the overall concept could be improved. I would appreciate your input on this question, so please try out the character inserter and tell me what changes to the design would (or would not!) best work for you.

Issues you might consider:
 * How often do you normally use Wikipedia's character inserters?
 * Which character sets are useful to you? Should it include all 18 of the character sets provided in the wikitext editor's newer toolbar at the English Wikipedia, the 10 present in the older editor toolbar, or some other combination of character sets?
 * How many special characters would you like to see at one time?
 * Should there be a "priority" or "favorites" section for the 10 or 12 characters that most editors need most often? Is it okay if you need an extra click to go beyond the limited priority set?
 * How should the sections be split up? Should they be nested? Ordered?
 * How should the sections be navigated? Should there be a drop-down? A nested menu?
 * The wikitext editor has never included many symbols and characters, like ℗ and ♀. Do you find that you need these missing characters?  If the character inserter in VisualEditor includes hundreds or thousands of special characters, will it be overwhelming? How will you find the character you want? What should be done for users without enough space to display more than a few dozen characters?
 * Should the character inserter be statically available until dismissed? Should it hover near the mouse? Should it go away on every selection or 10 seconds after a selection with no subsequent ones?
 * Some people believe that the toolbar already has too many options—how would you simplify it?

The developers are open to any thoughts on how the special character inserter can best be developed, even if this requires significant changes. Please leave your views on the central feedback page, or, if you'd prefer, you can contact me directly on my talk page. It would be really helpful if you can tell me how frequently you need to use special characters in your typical editing and what languages or other special characters are important to you.

Thank you again for your work with VisualEditor and for any feedback you can provide. I really do appreciate it.

P.S. You might be interested in the current ideas about improving citations, too. Whatamidoing (WMF) (talk) 00:20, 18 February 2014 (UTC)

Image frame
a demonstration of the problem with a large icon is shown in File:Image_frame_with_20px_icon.png. in both cases, the images should be on one line. Frietjes (talk) 14:32, 25 February 2014 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Debootstrap


The article Debootstrap has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Fails notability guideline WP:NSOFT: only primary sources.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Q VVERTYVS (hm?) 16:36, 27 February 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 4
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Łukasz Pawlikowski, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Grand Prix (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:16, 4 March 2014 (UTC)

Nomination of Debootstrap for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Debootstrap is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Debootstrap until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Q VVERTYVS (hm?) 15:09, 28 February 2014 (UTC)


 * Hi, I exported it to debootstrap, where notability is not required. It will be tagged for now. - Sidelight 12 Talk 18:55, 5 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Great, but we have this already as a draft here on Wikipedia. That great that you save content like this, so I think you'll be interested in new Wikipedia Draft system for wannabe/future articles. Thank you for this! --Rezonansowy (talk &bull; contribs) 21:05, 6 March 2014 (UTC)
 * yw. I didn't know about the draft namespace, it looks like it was created last December. The articles for creation was used for this before. Articles for creation. Draft looks way easier to use than this. (I wonder if afc is somewhat obsolete now) The exported page is in mainspace Wikiversity, where how-to can be added. So you may continue to use both. - Sidelight 12 Talk 00:03, 7 March 2014 (UTC)

An RfC that you may be interested in...
As one of the previous contributors to Infobox film or as one of the commenters on it's talk page, I would like to inform you that there has been a RfC started on the talk page as to implementation of previously deprecated parameters. Your comments and thoughts on the matter would be welcomed. Happy editing!
 * This message was sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of &#123;&#123;U&#124;Technical 13&#125;&#125; (t • e • c) 18:26, 8 March 2014 (UTC)

Commons request: Polish for Closed cap
Hi, Rezonansowy! I found there is a new version of Commons:Template:Closed cap on the Commons. Are you interested in adding Polish to it?

Thanks WhisperToMe (talk) 13:34, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Thanks for reminder. --Rezonansowy (talk &bull; contribs) 11:11, 16 March 2014 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Infobox publication
Template:Infobox publication has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. eh bien mon prince (talk) 12:25, 21 March 2014 (UTC)

Tor Browser Bundle nominated for deletion.
You are a major contributor there, so I thought you should know. Articles_for_deletion/Tor_Browser_Bundle 92.78.157.181 (talk) 12:08, 7 April 2014 (UTC)

Motto of the Day Help Request April 2014
Motto of the Day (WP:MOTD) is in a state of emergency and really needs your help! There are not enough editors who are reviewing or nominating mottos at Motto of the day/Nominations/In review, and this probably means that you will notice a red link or “This space for rent” as our mottos for the next weeks and months.

Please take a moment to review the nominations and nominate your own new mottos at Wikipedia:Motto of the day/Nominations/In review and Wikipedia:Motto of the day/Nominations/'Specials. Any help would be appreciated! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:13, 29 April 2014 (UTC)


 * This message has been sent by p joe f on behalf of Motto of the Day to all editors of the English Wikipedia who are showing MOTD's templates on their pages, and to all the participants to MOTD: (page, template, and category).

User:Rezonansowy/FloatHead and anchors
I've been using your FloadHead stuff and it's great except that it doesn't offset anchors correctly. When you click on an anchor, the anchor ends up underneath the floating header. This page might be helpful. PaleAqua (talk) 01:34, 28 May 2014 (UTC)

Polandball
Hi, I have recently expanded and rewritten the Polandball article at Draft:Polandball. I have also requested undeletion of the original article (that should never have been deleted in the first place) at Deletion_review/Log/2014_August_6. I am leaving you this message as you have the Polandball userbox on your talk page. 185.49.15.25 (talk) 07:18, 6 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Hah! Thanks! :) --Rezonansowy (talk | contribs) 13:43, 8 August 2014 (UTC)