User talk:Rfcrossp

A tag has been placed on Croftfoot United, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert notability may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is notable, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add  on the top of the page (below the existing db tag) and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. KFP (talk | contribs) 20:42, 24 January 2007 (UTC)

Regarding your edit to Croftfoot United:
Your recent edit to Croftfoot United (diff) was reverted by automated bot. The edit was identified as adding either vandalism, link spam, or test edits to the page. If you want to experiment, please use the sandbox. If this revert was in error, please contact the bot operator. Thanks! // VoABot II 21:25, 24 January 2007 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:41738664_krisboydstrip270.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:41738664_krisboydstrip270.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 06:53, 28 January 2007 (UTC)

Croftfoot United
Hello. As you know, Croftfoot United F.C. was previously deleted. It is very likely that it will be deleted again. There are no hard and fast rules for what is included in Wikipedia, but so far as Scottish football teams go, generally anything less than Junior clubs are very, very likely to be deleted. Help:Contents gives an overview of how to edit Wikipedia, and Notability gives some ideas on what is, or isn't, notable. If Croftfoot have been mentioned in the national press, or have won a major trophy or award, or something else exceptional, you should certainly add that to the article. It may not make any difference, but it can't hurt. Best regards, Angus McLellan (Talk) 19:46, 3 March 2007 (UTC)


 * I've removed the hangon thing. Nothing is nominated for deletion yet, and this page certainly won't be deleted. Apologies if that wasn't clear. Angus McLellan (Talk) 19:59, 3 March 2007 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Cufc.JPG
Thanks for uploading Image:Cufc.JPG. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 07:49, 4 March 2007 (UTC)