User talk:Rfischer8655

Need give the explanation
Hello. In this article is written that need give the explanation: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dmitry_Medvedev#Relationship_with_Putin (who is observer). Relatives of victims in accordance with the original. Simple citizens of counties from the former USSR and not only - also are observers (they see bad situation). How to be with citation (exist facts and very clear understanding: celebrate the terrible date - insult vs relatives of victims). Many of them live currently (Poland is not separate case). I ask you make the most optimal configuration on good English. Thank you! 95.29.147.57 (talk) 12:25, 17 March 2014 (UTC).

Disambiguation link notification for September 28
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Henry Daniell, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mutiny on the Bounty (film). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:21, 28 September 2014 (UTC)

Wisconsin edits

 * 1) I gave concrete, rational reasons for my edits; that's not arbitrary. You gave no reasons whatsoever for adding your unsourced edits.
 * 2) There is no requirement that Wikipedia editors register.
 * 3) You really need to learn something about Wikipedia policies and practices (WP:RS, WP:NPOV, WP:HUMAN, for example).
 * 4) You need to own up to and sign your comments. 32.218.35.156 (talk) 20:17, 8 July 2015 (UTC)

Please don't act liked you own this topic and are the final aribiter. My comments are traced and signed as a registered account. I gave reasons for every update and edit. There is an earlier comment about Wisconsin served by 8 commercial airports. Why is no citation needed there? In the meantime, I will cite Amtrak via link. Let's not make this into a a game of one upmanship. More, not less, relevant information is what this is all about for people interested in Wisconsin.

Please sign your comments
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either: This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.
 * 1) Add four tildes  ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment; or
 * 2) With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button (Insert-signature.png or Signature icon.png) located above the edit window.

Thank you. 32.218.35.156 (talk) 20:32, 8 July 2015 (UTC)

Edit warring at Wisconsin
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Wisconsin. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement. Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. 32.218.35.156 (talk) 20:37, 8 July 2015 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

Please provide edit summaries
Hi there! Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

I noticed your recent edit to Wisconsin does not have an edit summary.&#32;Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:
 * User contributions
 * Recent changes
 * Watchlists
 * Revision differences
 * IRC channels
 * Related changes
 * New pages list and
 * Article editing history

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. Thanks! 32.218.35.156 (talk) 20:39, 8 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Knee-jerk revert here; no edit summary or rationale provided.
 * No edit summary or rationale provided here.