User talk:Rfrf101

Welcome!
Hello, Rfrf101, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome! – Sir Lionel, EG(talk) 07:39, 26 August 2012 (UTC) – Sir Lionel, EG(talk) 07:39, 26 August 2012 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
 * Simplified Manual of Style

Reference errors on 26 July
Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. as follows: Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/RBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/RBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=ReferenceBot%20–%20&section=new report it to my operator]. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:23, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
 * On the Anjelica Huston page, [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=731581973 your edit] caused a cite error (help) . ([ Fix] | [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&preload=User:ReferenceBot/helpform&preloadtitle=Referencing%20errors%20on%20%5B%5BSpecial%3ADiff%2F731581973%7CAnjelica Huston%5D%5D Ask for help])

BLP discretionary sanctions
In particular, your recent edits at Beating of DeAndre Harris violate Wikipedia's WP:BLP policy.  Volunteer Marek  09:36, 2 December 2017 (UTC)

I didn't violate anything. My information is properly sourced and verifiable!

3RR
Your recent editing history at Beating of DeAndre Harris shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach a dead end, you can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

December 2017
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for contravening Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Guy (Help!) 09:44, 2 December 2017 (UTC)

May 2020
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on The Gateway Pundit; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Bennv3771 (talk) 09:33, 13 May 2020 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Doug Weller talk 09:51, 13 May 2020 (UTC)

You clearly don't know how Wikipedia works. The idea that the subject of an article should control the article is completely against the spirit and policies of Wikipedia. Doug Weller talk 09:53, 13 May 2020 (UTC)

Your response is complete and utter nonsense. It is because I'm trying to accurately building encyclopedia is a reason why I am editing. The authors of this article continually goes around to other sources to support their suggestion that Gateway pundit is conspiracy theorist and is far right. I properly sourced it corrected this page because a company has the right to define and describe what their company is. I went directly to that companies page and post it how they describe their self and properly Source the material. I'm going to tell you like I told those little petty kids, if you're going build a encyclopedia, your encyclopedia should not look like Reddit or gossip blog. This looks like a lefty gossip blog and an opinion piece.

Oh yeah, I most definitely would be appealing this BS you put on my account after being member 4/11 years. In addition I contacted the owner of Gateway pundit to let them know that Wikipedia is allowing defamation on this page and it's blocking anyone that corrects it if it doesn't fit the main opinion are these little children just that is writing it. Rfrf101 (talk) 22:51, 14 May 2020 (UTC)