User talk:Rgcolby1023

Rgcolby1023, you are invited on a Wikipedia Adventure!
 The Adventure

Non-free rationale for File:Becketlogo.png
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Becketlogo.png. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Nthep (talk) 16:47, 5 August 2015 (UTC)

Edits to Becket Legal Defence Fund
Hello! I know you are now aware that editing the Becket page is not a god idea, since, as you admitted on the COIN noticeboard, you work there. Here's the boilerplate warning about COI editing, which leads to several pages you may want to read, in order to familiarize yourself with the policies.

Hello, Rgcolby1023. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Becket_Fund_for_Religious_Liberty, you may have a conflict of interest. People with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, see the conflict of interest guideline and frequently asked questions for organizations. In particular, please:


 * avoid editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, its competitors, or projects and products you or they are involved with;
 * instead, propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (see the template);
 * avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
 * exercise great caution so that you do not violate Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use require disclosure of your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, sourcing, and autobiographies. Thank you. New Media Theorist (talk) 18:25, 19 September 2015 (UTC)

Your Conflict of Interest notification
It appears that a COI request you submitted has been answered. Please take a moment a view the reply over there - if this doesn't quite help you, please feel free to ask for more information or clarification. Tiggerjay (talk) 22:33, 19 September 2015 (UTC)