User talk:Rgl168

There is no justification in KEEPING who "powers" MLB.COM except as an advertising plug about the organization that "powers" it. Wahkeenah 17:13, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
 * An encyclopedia entry is about keeping history of information. Since the previous ownership of a domain site is historial information, such entry is completely within the scope of Wikipedia and it is not advertising.  Your name has been reported to the administrator for repeated removal. Rgl168 18:11, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
 * You should also be reported, and you will be, for continual violation of rules against personal advertising. Wahkeenah 19:40, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
 * You are more than welcomed to do so. Rgl168 20:10, 27 September 2006 (UTC)

Mediation
Hi there, Rgl168, I'm Shadow1, the mediator for the case you requested in the Mediation Cabal. In order to better facilitate communication during mediation, I'm asking you and Wahkeenah to explain your reasoning on this page. I look forward to seeing your replies. Thanks! Shadow1 (talk) 17:11, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Wahkeenah has expressed that he is no longer interested in this issue. Would you like me to declare the case closed? Shadow1  (talk) 17:19, 29 September 2006 (UTC)

Possibly unfree Image:11482i6.jpg
An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:11482i6.jpg, has been listed at Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Mosmof (talk) 23:10, 17 September 2008 (UTC)

I respectfully disagree with this assessment based on the following: - Copyright laws around the world do not discriminate between different forms of expression; ie. rules apply to the work regardless whether it is a picture or written words. - "Publications" from Thai government (or any government) can be of both written words and images; if Thai law specifically states that images are copyrighted separately than written words, it would have said so. - Thai government website which the image originated from has no indication that image contents are copyrighted separately than written contents. Rgl168 (talk) 17:22, 18 October 2008 (UTC)