User talk:Rgsmith2b

Disputed fair use rationale for File:1688 germantown quaker petition against slavery.jpg}
Thank you for uploading File:1688 germantown quaker petition against slavery.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check:
 * That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's escription page for each article the image is used in.
 * That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 01:35, 1 February 2009 (UTC)

The 1688 Germantown Quaker Petition Against Slavery
Hi: I saw your recent article on the New African Related Articles. This is a good start on an important topic, but it is written quite differently from what we generally expect from Wikipedia articles. As I'm sure you well know, contributions to Wikipedia will be edited and changed by others constantly, sometimes ruthlessly. I thought you'd like a heads up on some of the issues which will likely soon be addressed: whether by you or other editors who come across this article.

First, there will need to be some inline citations. It could be ignorance on my part, but I find "The petition was the first public document to protest slavery. It was also the first written public declaration of universal human rights." both rather hard to believe. I know certain Songhai sources consider legal documents from the 17th century to be the first declarations of universal human rights in Africa. Additionally, the entire article is written as a personally essay: the tone will have to be changed. Statements like "The King was happy" will have to include references or be changed. The history of the colony, or William Penn, or Quakerism will have to be either integrated into the relevant articles or simply removed. The text of the petition will need to be moved to http://en.wikibooks.org/. It is a good start on an interesting subject, but it important to understand the difference between what is expected in a university essay and what is expected in Wikipedia articles.

Also the wikilink of words like Decades, argument, surveyed, churches, houses all need to be removed. Internal links should be to articles supportive of the subject. No one is going to read this and think "what's a house?" They may well need to know who William Penn was, and at the first usage (only) you should links such articles. Please take a quick browse through the Manual of Style and begin a re-write. Thanks T L Miles (talk) 00:36, 2 February 2009 (UTC)

RGS: Thanks for your comments -- have removed some of the wikilinks and edited for more objectivity. I believe it is important to have the text and images of the petition on the same page -- because the reader can then directly check the unorthodox wording. The petition is unusual and this is emphasized in the article.

Notification of automated file description generation
Your upload of File:Bellevue estate map 1840.jpg or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.

This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 13:11, 30 January 2014 (UTC)


 * Another one of your uploads, File:Bellevue estate map 1820.jpg, has also had some information automatically added. If you get a moment, please review the bot's contributions there as well. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 13:06, 31 January 2014 (UTC)


 * Another one of your uploads, File:Bellevue mansion 1895.jpg, has also had some information automatically added. If you get a moment, please review the bot's contributions there as well. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 13:11, 31 January 2014 (UTC)


 * Another one of your uploads, File:Bellevue mansion painting.jpg, has also had some information automatically added. If you get a moment, please review the bot's contributions there as well. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 13:11, 31 January 2014 (UTC)


 * Another one of your uploads, File:Bellevue estate map 1870.jpg, has also had some information automatically added. If you get a moment, please review the bot's contributions there as well. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 13:15, 31 January 2014 (UTC)


 * Another one of your uploads, File:Bellevue estate map 1920.jpg, has also had some information automatically added. If you get a moment, please review the bot's contributions there as well. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 13:15, 31 January 2014 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:34, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:The cliffs 2.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:The cliffs 2.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:11, 4 November 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Fisher map delaware bay.jpg


The file File:Fisher map delaware bay.jpg has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Orphaned map."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ~ Rob 13 Talk 17:28, 7 March 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Bellevue estate map 1820x.png


The file File:Bellevue estate map 1820x.png has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Orphaned map."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ~ Rob 13 Talk 17:31, 7 March 2018 (UTC)