User talk:Rguitphil

Help
Help Me


 * What do you need help with? —Ignatzmicetalkcontribs 17:29, 7 October 2007 (UTC)


 * It's not such a good idea to have an article in separate pieces. However, you can use headers, like


 * ==Songs==


 * ===For many instruments===


 * ====Guitar and Piano====


 * ====Flute and Violin====


 * ===Piano===


 * ===Flute===


 * Hope this helps! —Ignatzmicetalkcontribs 17:36, 9 October 2007 (UTC)

License tagging for Image:Llobet.gif
Thanks for uploading Image:Llobet.gif. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Media copyright questions. 15:15, 4 October 2006 (UTC)

Segovia
Hi,

My motivation for adding the goals was simply to end the squabble over whether he had so-called "rescued" the guitar from "Gypsy" influences. They can't argue with his own words! I am surprised at the intensity of this debate, we don't observe it surrounding other historical musical figures who often possesed similar inflated egos. It is good to examine the issue but not long ago the article was almost vitriolic. My view is that probably he had to have such a personality to achieve as he did. Or perhaps it's a national thing - my principle guitar teacher was also a Spaniard, and a participant in Segovia's classes in early '60's, he possessed a similar streak of "self assurance" verging on the dictatorial. As you are aware approaches to performance change and evolve. I don't see that we should remove his stated goals just because the first couple rankle or we disagree with them. These goals were his, not ours, and seem to underpin most of the myth (or hyperbole, if you prefer) that he created or that surrounded him. I'd prefer and suggest that the five points be rationally addressed in the following section rather than remove them completely. So treat them as invitation for further information(/discussion?) Richard RichardJ Christie 22:16, 30 November 2007 (UTC) PS I enjoyed the Llobet article RichardJ Christie 06:09, 1 December 2007 (UTC)

Feedback reply
. MatthewVanitas (talk) 16:20, 8 May 2011 (UTC)


 * . MatthewVanitas (talk) 19:05, 9 May 2011 (UTC)

Articles about guitarists/composers - threat of deletion
Hello Rguitphil,

I noticed that you write articles about guitarists/composers, so I thought you might want to vote in the current debate about deleting James Lentini's page:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/James_Lentini

Someone wants to delete it because he thinks Lentini is not notable enough to be included in Wikipedia, and he goes on to say that he thinks lots of other composers/musicians should be deleted, too, because he doesn't think they are notable enough either. So, I thought you might want to chime in with your own vote (Keep or Delete), since you seem to know a bit about classical guitarists/composers. Thanks... Joanne McAllister (talk) 18:22, 8 June 2011 (UTC)

Non-free rationale for File:Miguel Llobet.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Miguel Llobet.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:47, 12 August 2011 (UTC)

File:Biophoto2b.jpg listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Biophoto2b.jpg, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Kelly hi! 19:46, 8 November 2011 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 4
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Michael Colina, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Robert Phillips (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:39, 4 October 2013 (UTC)

File:Biophoto.jpg listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Biophoto.jpg, has been listed at Files for discussion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Pkbwcgs (talk) 20:08, 15 April 2018 (UTC)