User talk:Rhain/2012

Disambiguation link notification
Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.


 * Daleks – Invasion Earth: 2150 A.D. (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added links pointing to David Graham, Steve Peters and Ray Brooks


 * Dr. Who and the Daleks (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to David Graham

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:41, 2 January 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Time Agent


A tag has been placed on Time Agent requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.) or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. → Σ  τ  c. 00:57, 6 January 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Time Agent


A tag has been placed on Time Agent requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.) or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. → Σ  τ  c. 00:57, 6 January 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification
Hi. When you recently edited Dr. Who and the Daleks, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Mike Reid and Gerald Taylor (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:24, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

Deleting other people's comments on talk pages
Hi, please do not delete other people's comments from talk pages, even when they have been resolved, as you did. This page is set up to be automatically archived by when the thread reaches ten days from the last posting. The reason that these threads, which are older than that, have not yet been automatically archived is that MiszaBot I is also configured to leave a minimum of three threads on the page. -- Red rose64 (talk) 16:57, 9 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Sorry, I thought I was helping out. >.< Rhain1999 (talk) 22:05, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:Facebook log in Dec2011.png
Thank you for uploading File:Facebook log in Dec2011.png. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright and licensing status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can verify that it has an acceptable license status and a verifiable source. Please add this information by editing the image description page. You may refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is [ a list of your uploads].

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Ankit Maity  Talk 16:03, 22 January 2012 (UTC)

February 2012
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at 2012 in Australian music. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. ''

Please stop adding yourself to Wikipedia pages. As you yourself said, you are not yet notable, and that means you should not be in, for instance, lists of upcoming releases. And if you were notable, you still should not add yourself to Wikipedia, because you have a conflict of interest.  bonadea'' contributions talk 09:45, 12 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Oh, okay. So sorry. Just realised. Rhain1999 (talk) 10:05, 12 February 2012 (UTC)
 * The same thing applies to this. Please continue with the constructive edits you've been making to articles, but don't insert yourself or your friends. Once you chart, somebody else will add you to Wikipedia. Thanks! --bonadea contributions talk 11:02, 19 February 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of 2012 in Australian music


The article 2012 in Australian music has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * No verifiable content, WP:CRYSTAL.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. WWGB (talk) 10:35, 12 February 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 17
Hi. When you recently edited Tonight's the Night (TV series), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page HD (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:49, 17 March 2012 (UTC)

March 2012
Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, as you did to the article Eminem, please cite a reliable source for your addition. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. See Citing sources for how to cite sources, and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Secret account 14:11, 26 March 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of RHYMAN


A tag has been placed on RHYMAN requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. WWGB (talk) 14:14, 26 March 2012 (UTC)

MfD nomination of User:Rhain1999/workspace/The Inevitable Sacrifice
User:Rhain1999/workspace/The Inevitable Sacrifice, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Rhain1999/workspace/The Inevitable Sacrifice and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ). You are free to edit the content of User:Rhain1999/workspace/The Inevitable Sacrifice during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. bonadea contributions talk 20:21, 29 March 2012 (UTC)

D12 template
Please read WP:NAV. The purpose of the template is to provide navigation between existing articles, you know this because you quoted it. Articles do not exist for Kuniva, Fuzz Scoota or Swifty McVay, ergo they shouldn't be included on the template. Now, instead of edit warring and trying to force their inclusion, you should either write the articles first or, if you do not feel you can do this, request for the articles to be created instead. Once the articles exist, then they can be included on the template. Until then, though, continuing to add them can be considered disruptive editing. If you need any help, feel free to message me. Regards. HrZ (talk) 11:52, 2 April 2012 (UTC)
 * What about on the Axis of Justice template below?
 * Axis of Justice
 * There's names on there that don't have articles, and they seem notable, so do the official members of D12... -_- Rhain1999 (talk) 22:10, 2 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Are you bothering to read the WP:NAV article? "Unlinked text should be avoided. For example, Axis of Justice lists non-articles under "Notable guests", but this content seems more appropriate in an article." The very template you used as an example. Again, if they are notable, articles should be created for them. No link. No inclusion. It really is that simple. That is the purpose of the template. HrZ (talk) 13:45, 3 April 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Jaime Carroll


The article Jaime Carroll has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * No reliable sources in the article or to be found. Article has been deleted before for lack of sources.  Reliable sources (per WP:SOURCES) must be added for the article to remain.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bgwhite (talk) 04:45, 19 April 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Time Agent


A tag has been placed on Time Agent requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. WWGB (talk) 10:02, 19 April 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 19
Hi. When you recently edited Lana McKissack, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Asian and Caucasian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 04:37, 19 August 2012 (UTC)

Doctor Who DYK?
FYI: I have nominated The Power of Three (Doctor Who) and The Angels Take Manhattan for DYK. You can see the discussion at Template:Did you know nominations/The Power of Three (Doctor Who) and Template:Did you know nominations/The Angels Take Manhattan. I listed you as co-nominator. Cheers! Glimmer721 talk  15:20, 19 August 2012 (UTC)

Yay! Thank you very much! I'm proud to say that some of the articles that I've created have been nominated for DYK's! I'm normally really bad at making articles, so this makes me pretty proud. Thank you. :D Rhain1999 (talk) 06:26, 20 August 2012 (UTC)


 * You have reason to be proud :-) DYK nominations are pretty cool! (Maybe not as cool as bow ties, but we can't all be the Doctor.) Thanks for your work on improving Wikipedia - keep it up! --bonadea contributions talk 09:19, 20 August 2012 (UTC)


 * But I am the Doctor. The definite article, you might say! And thank you. My entire talk page is covered with negative sections about speedy deletions of pages I've made, but all recent pages that I've made have been recognised well, so I'm proud. :) Rhain1999 (talk) 11:12, 20 August 2012 (UTC)

DYK for The Power of Three (Doctor Who)
— Crisco 1492 (talk) 08:02, 22 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Yay yay yay yay! I feel so proud. My article was on the main page! :D Thank you for choosing this, Wikipedia!! :') Rhain1999 (talk) 09:13, 22 August 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of Lana McKissack for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Lana McKissack is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Lana McKissack until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Stuartyeates (talk) 23:22, 1 September 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of The Fu Music for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Fu Music is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/The Fu Music until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Stuartyeates (talk) 00:23, 4 September 2012 (UTC)

September 2012
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for repeatedly creating articles, and in some cases, recreating articles, about non-notable subjects. People have tried, over and over again, to point you to our guidelines. You simply are not allowed to say "the guidelines are too long, I don't understand them." If you are unable or unwilling to learn the rules for what are and are not viable article subjects, you cannot edit here. Yes, you've had a few successes, but you've had more misses (including repeated attempts to create articles about yourself). At this point, your failure rate is too high, and it's causing an inordinate amount of work for other editors. I considered making this indefinite, but instead, I'm making it only a week. Spend the week reading policies and guidelines. When you come back, I strongly suggest using WP:AFC rather than trying to create articles directly yourself. Or, better yet, don't create new articles--find ways to add to existing ones. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Qwyrxian (talk) 01:28, 4 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Completely understandable. I will now attempt to keep my account in good standing. :) Rhain1999 (talk) 10:05, 11 September 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of Brothers Riedell for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Brothers Riedell is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Brothers Riedell until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article.  Zappa  O  Mati   00:01, 6 September 2012 (UTC)

DYK for The Angels Take Manhattan
Casliber (talk · contribs) 08:02, 7 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Yay! Thank you very much for this. :) Rhain1999 (talk) 10:04, 11 September 2012 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Slender
Template:Slender has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.  Zappa  O  Mati   15:20, 30 September 2012 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:The Angel's Kiss.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:The Angel's Kiss.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright and licensing status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can verify that it has an acceptable license status and a verifiable source. Please add this information by editing the image description page. You may refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is [ a list of your uploads].

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Stefan2 (talk) 12:56, 1 October 2012 (UTC)

License tagging for File:The Angel's Kiss.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:The Angel's Kiss.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 14:05, 1 October 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of YTF Legacy for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article YTF Legacy is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/YTF Legacy until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. -- Tea with toast  (話)  23:12, 1 October 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 13
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited P.S. (Doctor Who), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Matt Smith and Mark Williams (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:54, 13 October 2012 (UTC)

List of YouTube personalities
This edit with the hidden message, is an insufficient reason for keeping the personality in the article. Please remember that a high number of views and/or subscribers is not a valid reason for inclusion on this list, and does not demonstrate notability - reliable sources do. -- MST  ☆  R   (Chat Me!) 00:33, 18 November 2012 (UTC)