User talk:Rhain/2017 January–June

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Flower, Sun, and Rain gameplay.gif
Thank you for uploading File:Flower, Sun, and Rain gameplay.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. – Finnusertop (talk ⋅ contribs) 22:04, 10 February 2017 (UTC)

File:Flower, Sun, and Rain gameplay.gif listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Flower, Sun, and Rain gameplay.gif, has been listed at Files for discussion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. – Finnusertop (talk ⋅ contribs) 23:33, 10 February 2017 (UTC)

Leslie Benzies
Hi there, I am contacting you on behalf of a client who is working on behalf of Leslie Benzies.

On the 29th of January you reverted an update to the webpage of Leslie Benzies where his display image was altered to an up-to-date image. You reverted without reason being provided.

The image is more recent than the previous, and has full copyright privilege and was authorised by Mr Benzies himself.

Now my client is not that familiar with Wikipedia and may have made an error in the uploading that voided copyright somehow, and if so i understand your revert completely. However I was just wondering if you could explain this further so we can proceed.

Thank you!

jacka1993 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jacka1993 (talk • contribs) 11:32, 13 February 2017 (UTC)


 * Thank you for your message, and your edits to the article. I apologise for not providing a reason for my revert. Basically, the copyright ownership of the image (which has since been deleted—see deletion request) was unclear. While claims to be the owner of the image (which I personally do not doubt, but professionally must remain questionable about), it is not clear that this is the case; this also applies to the image of Matthew Smith. If you wish for the image to be re-uploaded, I recommend submitting a declaration of consent with the necessary information to OTRS (if you have not yet done so). All details about this declaration can be found at WP:CONSENT. If you have any other concerns, let me know. Thanks. –  Rhain  ☔ 14:36, 13 February 2017 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Flower, Sun, and Rain gameplay.gif
 Thanks for uploading File:Flower, Sun, and Rain gameplay.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:29, 14 February 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Walker (video game)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Walker (video game) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Indrian -- Indrian (talk) 05:21, 16 February 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Walker (video game)
The article Walker (video game) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Walker (video game) for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Indrian -- Indrian (talk) 16:01, 21 February 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Walker (video game)
The article Walker (video game) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Walker (video game) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Indrian -- Indrian (talk) 15:41, 25 February 2017 (UTC)

Take a peak, if you could...
Could you take a peak at the awards table at 2016 in video gaming, following your same format? BAFTAs aren't in but the first 3 are there. --M ASEM (t) 05:15, 2 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the message. I think it looks good! I'll look into making tables for the previous years when I can. I find it interesting that Overwatch has won three of the four Game of the Year awards so far, even though the majority is naming Uncharted 4 as the favourite. Divided, to say the least. – Rhain  ☔ 05:25, 2 March 2017 (UTC)

I want to get your opinion again on the table, please see 2014 in video gaming. There are two situations that are not covered by the previous table format that I want to check: Thanks. --M ASEM (t) 21:25, 13 March 2017 (UTC)
 * For the DICE awards, Destiny won both the audio and the separate soundtrack award. It does not make sense to merge those two awards to give the appearance that there was only one award.
 * Monument Valley won the combined handheld/mobile for the GDC and BAFTA awards (neighbors on the table) ; does it make sense to make this a row-col 2x2 spanning block for that?
 * That's an interesting situation. I agree with your point about Destiny—it's always possible to merge the two wins and leave a footnote with clarification, but I think the way you've done it works well. As for Monument Valley: the "[year] in film" articles merge columns and rows for multiple wins, and in this case it won the combined award (not like Destiny with Audio), so a 2x2 block makes sense here. I like the work you've been doing! – Rhain  ☔ 22:16, 13 March 2017 (UTC)

Fair Use in Australia discussion
As an Australian Wikipedian, your opinion is sought on a proposal to advocate for the introduction of Fair Use into Australian copyright law. The discussion is taking place at the Australian Wikipedians' notice board, please read the proposal and comment there. MediaWiki message delivery MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:08, 2 March 2017 (UTC)

This message has been automatically sent to all users in Category:Australian Wikipedians. If you do not wish to receive further messages like this, please either remove your user page from this category, or add yourself to Category:Opted-out of message delivery

Ellie (The Last of Us)
Hello:

The copy edit that you requested from the Guild of Copy Editors of the article Ellie (The Last of Us) has been completed.

Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns.

Good luck with your FAN request.

Regards,

Twofingered Typist (talk) 21:19, 2 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Thank you for your edits! Hopefully the next candidacy goes a little better than the first two. – Rhain  ☔ 22:02, 2 March 2017 (UTC)

Do you get paid for these edits? --2607:FB90:6459:E2B1:0:4B:9BC1:AB01 (talk) 22:17, 15 March 2017 (UTC)jen
 * I do not. Paid contributions must be disclosed. – Rhain  ☔ 02:39, 16 March 2017 (UTC)

SuddenDeath
FYI: -- Laser brain   (talk)  03:20, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Thanks. I had intended to create a talk page thread if the user continued to revert, but figured that I'd suggest it to them first, as they were the one altering the status quo. Do note that I only made the suggestion once, and would have taken the next appropriate steps myself upon further opposition. I was unaware of the editor's history. – Rhain  ☔ 03:32, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
 * I've yet to see him engage on a Talk page, so you're probably wasting your time. He'll argue in edit summaries and sometimes go to user Talk pages. -- Laser brain  (talk)  03:53, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
 * I figured it would be rather useless, but I like to avoid edit warring, so it was the next logical step for me. Administrators noticeboard seems like a good choice though. – Rhain  ☔ 03:54, 21 March 2017 (UTC)

about "clear"
White-space minimization is another goal, "clear" increases the white space. I think also here "clear" was not a benefit for readability or structure but just increased the white-space... but I will not argue wiht you here, not important enough. Shaddim (talk) 18:34, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Keeping clear allows the References section to utilise the full page width; without the template, the reviews table pushes the references to the side. – Rhain  ☔ 23:35, 6 April 2017 (UTC)

Far Harbor
Hey Rhain, seeing as you reviewed Fallout 4: Far Harbor, I thought contacting you to tell you that it's at FAC now (again) would be a good idea. If you've got any improvement ideas or comments, please tell me. Cheers,  Anarchyte  ( work  &#124;  talk )   11:11, 18 April 2017 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Slender The Eight Pages logo.png
 Thanks for uploading File:Slender The Eight Pages logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:51, 25 April 2017 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Horizon Zero Dawn gameplay screenshot.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Horizon Zero Dawn gameplay screenshot.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:40, 18 May 2017 (UTC)

Video game walkthrough article
Hi there! Just sending a quick follow up message as I noticed that the discussion on the talk page of WP:Video games was archived already. Have you managed to take a look at Video game walkthrough? --TheSandDoctor (talk) 04:50, 24 May 2017 (UTC)
 * My apologies—I've been a little busy as of late, and haven't had a chance to thoroughly look through the article yet. Some quick notes:
 * The "History" section could do with some expansion, particularly with the one-sentence paragraphs; perhaps they could be merged somehow. I also expected to see more dates/years mentioned in this section, like when Twitch.tv started becoming popular for walkthroughs, or when Let's Play videos began taking form, and by whom (if applicable, and if reliable secondary sources find it notable).
 * The information regarding the Rockstar Editor could probably be shortened a fair amount. I don't think there's any need to mention who developed and published the game; the sentence could probably read something like "Several video games, including Grand Theft Auto V (2013), feature in-game recording features, allowing players to record and edit gameplay." (and then reference it).
 * To me, "Examples of walkthroughs and guides" is an invitation for IP editors to try to advertise their own walkthroughs, or their favourite YouTubers. It's also not entirely necessary to point out specific examples like this. Perhaps this subsection could be merged into its parent section—is there any information available regarding how (or why) Prima Games or CVG publish/ed walkthroughs and guides?
 * There are quite a few inconsistencies within the referencing, and a few unreliable sources, but I'm sure this will be addressed in-depth in a GA review.
 * I'll try to take a proper look, and perhaps make some changes myself, if I have time. For now, it's a good start! – Rhain  ☔ 03:05, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
 * No problem! Thank you for looking and I welcome any edits to it. Regarding the history section, I agree with you that it be expanded but I have run into difficulties finding sources and pinning exact "dates" (even just years). I have gone ahead and shortened the Rockstar Editor example as you suggested.
 * I never thought of "Examples of walkthroughs and guides" in that way so thank you for pointing it out! You are 100% right. I have removed the subheading and merged it with its parent. If you think it is unneeded to provide examples, feel free to remove it or tweak it as you see fit. As for the referencing inconsistencies, what do you mean by "inconsistencies" in this case?
 * Thanks again for your input and I look forward to your response. The majority of what you have said so far I have implemented. --TheSandDoctor (talk) 05:20, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
 * No worries, thanks for replying. I think providing some examples (such as Prima Games and CVG) is inevitable, but outlining a certain subsection to solely list examples (which may very well devolve into a WP:PROSELINE of sorts) may not be the best approach—merging it into the parent section, as you have done, is a more seamless integration. Regarding referencing inconsistencies: some references refer to websites by their company name (Kotaku, CNN) and some refer to the URL itself (venturebeat.com, www.gamefaqs.com). Not the end of the world, but definitely something that requires attention before GA. I'll try and do some edits in the near future if I can find the time. Thanks again. – Rhain  ☔ 12:56, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Ah, I see what you mean. The visual editor is mainly to blame for that as I do not manually enter the references if I can avoid it and have not done so for this particle article (that I recall). Going in and editing them shouldn't be too difficult (I think) unless they are using different citation templates (ie web and news). I cant look at it right now but will later today. --TheSandDoctor (talk) 14:51, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
 * They were using different templates in some cases but I was able to go in and manually edit them. Do the edits I have made alleviate some of the concerns that you raised? --TheSandDoctor (talk) 21:48, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
 * It's definitely in better shape than beforehand. I'm sure an in-depth GA review will polish the article much more. Best of luck! – Rhain  ☔ 00:22, 28 May 2017 (UTC)

The Last of Us scheduled for TFA
This is to let you know that the The Last of Us article has been scheduled as today's featured article for 14 June 2017. Please check the article needs no amendments. If you're interested in editing the main page text, you're welcome to do so at Today's featured article/June 14, 2017. Thanks! Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 12:21, 27 May 2017 (UTC)


 * Thank you for "one of the greatest video games of all time"! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:00, 14 June 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Hayao Miyazaki
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Hayao Miyazaki you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Narutolovehinata5 -- Narutolovehinata5 (talk) 10:40, 12 June 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Hayao Miyazaki
The article Hayao Miyazaki you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Hayao Miyazaki for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Narutolovehinata5 -- Narutolovehinata5 (talk) 12:41, 12 June 2017 (UTC)

Shilling for TakeTwo Interactive
This user has removed a valid controversy from the GTA V Controversies Wikipedia page regarding the OpenIV cease and desist letter that was sent to developers by Take Two. Judging by their almost exclusive history of editing Take Two and Rockstar affiliated pages, one can assume what their real motivation was. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 199.19.94.16 (talk) 22:25, 17 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Nice assumption, but I wouldn't have written an entire article about their game's controversy if that was my "motivation". The information was removed because it is not a controversy, nor is it directly related to Grand Theft Auto V—the information has been appropriately added to the Modding in Grand Theft Auto article. – Rhain  ☔ 23:23, 17 June 2017 (UTC)

Unspecified source/license for File:Uncharted The Lost Legacy cover art.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Uncharted The Lost Legacy cover art.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like PD-self (to release all rights), (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot (Talk • Contribs • Owner) 15:45, 18 June 2017 (UTC)