User talk:Rhain/2018 January–June

L.A. Noire 2 listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect L.A. Noire 2. Since you had some involvement with the L.A. Noire 2 redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Lordtobi ( &#9993; ) 18:58, 11 January 2018 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Watch Dogs crime prevention system.png
Thanks for uploading File:Watch Dogs crime prevention system.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:36, 15 January 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 17
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited An Unearthly Child, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Fourth dimension ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/An_Unearthly_Child check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/An_Unearthly_Child?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:25, 17 February 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 24
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited The Daleks, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Richard Martin ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/The_Daleks check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/The_Daleks?client=notify fix with Dab solver]).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:20, 24 February 2018 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of The Daleks
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article The Daleks you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Aoba47 -- Aoba47 (talk) 22:40, 27 February 2018 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of The Daleks
The article The Daleks you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:The Daleks for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Aoba47 -- Aoba47 (talk) 15:40, 28 February 2018 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of The Daleks
The article The Daleks you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:The Daleks for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Aoba47 -- Aoba47 (talk) 23:01, 28 February 2018 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:The Music of Grand Theft Auto V.png
Thanks for uploading File:The Music of Grand Theft Auto V.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:32, 5 March 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 12
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited The Aztecs (Doctor Who), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ITV ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/The_Aztecs_%28Doctor_Who%29 check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/The_Aztecs_%28Doctor_Who%29?client=notify fix with Dab solver]).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:09, 12 March 2018 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of The Aztecs (Doctor Who)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article The Aztecs (Doctor Who) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Aoba47 -- Aoba47 (talk) 22:40, 15 March 2018 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of The Aztecs (Doctor Who)
The article The Aztecs (Doctor Who) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:The Aztecs (Doctor Who) for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Aoba47 -- Aoba47 (talk) 06:20, 16 March 2018 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of The Aztecs (Doctor Who)
The article The Aztecs (Doctor Who) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:The Aztecs (Doctor Who) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Aoba47 -- Aoba47 (talk) 22:21, 16 March 2018 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of The Keys of Marinus
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article The Keys of Marinus you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Aoba47 -- Aoba47 (talk) 19:00, 25 March 2018 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of The Keys of Marinus
The article The Keys of Marinus you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:The Keys of Marinus for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Aoba47 -- Aoba47 (talk) 21:00, 27 March 2018 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of The Keys of Marinus
The article The Keys of Marinus you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:The Keys of Marinus for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Aoba47 -- Aoba47 (talk) 16:21, 28 March 2018 (UTC)

L.A. Noire
L.A. Noire, an article that you or your project may be interested in, has been nominated for an individual good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. AIRcorn (talk) 23:15, 30 March 2018 (UTC)

Why do you always change all the new links back to old dead links?
Why do you ALWAYS change all the new links in the Wolfenstein: The New Order back to old links that ALWAYS either redirect to new links or are dead links as shown here? If old dead links and WebCite are always the way you like, then I'm not doing the Wolfenstein: The New Order article anymore! Let all the old, dead links stay obsolete since 2014! --Angeldeb82 (talk) 15:09, 5 April 2018 (UTC)
 * There's no need to be dramatic. What are the "dead links" that you are referring to? There's 122 references in the article, so narrowing it down would help greatly. – Rhain  ☔ 15:13, 5 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Plenty. There's this GameFront link that leads to a dead link; an AusGamers link that leads to a dead link, which I've tried changing to a new one that I want you to change the dead link to, a link that's a redirect, an old, dead TotalXbox link that redirects to GamesRadar+, a 3News link that redirects to the Newshub link, an old Joystiq link that has since redirected to the Engadget link, an old VideoGamer.com link that has changed to a new one, and an old Digital Spy link that does not work, which I've tried changing to a new one that I also want you to change the dead link to.  Can you fix all these links for me? --Angeldeb82 (talk) 15:27, 5 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Nobody does anything "for [you]" on Wikipedia, but for the betterment of the article, I have corrected those dead links. Pointing out the specific issues in the future (or simply going through and fixing/highlighting them yourself) works far better than crying "Let all the old, dead links stay obsolete since 2014!". Editors who contest you on Wikipedia are not your enemy; we are all trying to achieve the same goal: to make the site better. Anger and upset will not help anyone to achieve this goal—keep a level head instead. All the best. – Rhain  ☔ 15:48, 5 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Thanks. I'm sorry that I got mad at you.  I'll try to stay calm and do better next time, okay? --Angeldeb82 (talk) 16:07, 5 April 2018 (UTC)

DYK for The Keys of Marinus
Ritchie333 (talk) 00:03, 14 April 2018 (UTC)

DYK for The Daleks
Alex Shih (talk) 00:01, 17 April 2018 (UTC)

File:William-Hartnell.jpg
This photo is quite obviously a copyvio owned by the BBC, not a CC file. Paul Benjamin Austin (talk) 05:11, 22 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Then nominate it for deletion on Commons. Considering it was uploaded 15 months ago and is used on 14 different language wikis, I'd say a deletion discussion is in order if you feel it's falsely attributed. Your discussion on WT:WHO is certainly a good start too. – Rhain  ☔ 05:16, 22 April 2018 (UTC)

DYK for The Aztecs (Doctor Who)
Gatoclass (talk) 00:01, 24 April 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 5
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited My Kitchen Rules (series 9), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages SBS and Channel 7 ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/My_Kitchen_Rules_%28series_9%29 check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/My_Kitchen_Rules_%28series_9%29?client=notify fix with Dab solver]).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:20, 5 May 2018 (UTC)

Red Dead Redemption 2 (Rockstar Studios)
It's not known huh? https://rockstarintel.com/2018/05/04/red-dead-2-consolidate/ UnknownAssassin1819 (talk) 06:04, 6 May 2018 (UTC)
 * My point still stands that your edits were unsourced. It's probably best to wait until we see final credits to add specific studio names to articles—who's to say that "all of them" does or does not include Rockstar India, for example? – Rhain  ☔ 06:11, 6 May 2018 (UTC)
 * The article clearly states that Rockstar consolidated all of its studios and teams to make RDR2. Yes, that means ALL studios, including Rockstar India, were involved. If Rockstar used all of their studios and teams to develop Max Payne 3, what makes you think they wouldn't do the same with RDR2, especially since the developer is also Rockstar Studios? UnknownAssassin1819 (talk) 15:37, 6 May 2018 (UTC)
 * It's certainly a fair assumption to make, but I still think we ought to wait before stating anything—you seemed hesitant adding the game to the Rockstar India article, for example. Besides, does "all" studios include Rockstar Lincoln, who was not credited as a development for Max Payne 3? I understand that Lincoln pretty much shut down its development team several years ago, but they're still technically one of Rockstar's studios, so who's to say that they're involved or not? As I said, I think it's safer to wait until we have a full list. – Rhain  ☔ 02:07, 7 May 2018 (UTC)
 * With all due respect, it's not an assumption, it's a fact, confirmed by a co-studio director at Rockstar North. Yes, Rockstar Lincoln was involved with Max Payne 3, but they're involved with every title they release, they don't exactly "develop" the game per se, they're responsible for QA and Localization, which is seen as a big impact for video games, still involved with RDR2 though. I know YouTube isn't a reliable source, but here are the end credits for Max Payne 3, around the 15 minute-mark, Rockstar Lincoln is credited: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pwVQD5Kyb34. We can wait for the official credits released by Rockstar (even though they were pretty much confirmed), sure. But we shouldn't have to wait just because your instincts say we should, when it's clearly been confirmed. UnknownAssassin1819 (talk) 02:42, 7 May 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 9
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited The Reign of Terror (Doctor Who), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page SFX ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/The_Reign_of_Terror_%28Doctor_Who%29 check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/The_Reign_of_Terror_%28Doctor_Who%29?client=notify fix with Dab solver]).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:08, 9 June 2018 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Spyro Reignited Trilogy.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Spyro Reignited Trilogy.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:59, 11 June 2018 (UTC)

Revert edit on Crash Bandicoot
Um. Why did you revert my latest edit on Crash Bandicoot? AlexanderEssienArthur (talk) 00:16, 18 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Firstly, Unilad is not a reliable source, so should not be used. Secondly, Activision has provided no official comment regarding the new titles mentioned in the source—as far as we know, it is simply speculation. – Rhain  ☔ 00:21, 19 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Okay, thanks for telling me about the advice. AlexanderEssienArthur (talk) 21:36, 19 June 2018 (UTC)

That Dragon, Cancer
Hi Rhain, just wanted to say thanks for restoring that bit I inadvertently removed. It was rather well hidden in the mass of citations for the previous sentence and I didn't notice. Good eye! – NULL  ‹talk› ‹edits›  21:37, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
 * No worries, it was difficult to spot. – Rhain  ☔ 02:00, 22 June 2018 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of The Reign of Terror (Doctor Who)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article The Reign of Terror (Doctor Who) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Aoba47 -- Aoba47 (talk) 19:00, 26 June 2018 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of The Reign of Terror (Doctor Who)
The article The Reign of Terror (Doctor Who) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:The Reign of Terror (Doctor Who) for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Aoba47 -- Aoba47 (talk) 01:40, 28 June 2018 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of The Reign of Terror (Doctor Who)
The article The Reign of Terror (Doctor Who) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:The Reign of Terror (Doctor Who) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Aoba47 -- Aoba47 (talk) 02:01, 28 June 2018 (UTC)