User talk:Rhal zahi

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Billy Meier. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated (whether as a link in article text, or a citation in an article), and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. Melcous (talk) 08:52, 17 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Hi again and thanks for your message on my talk page. Wikipedia has a clear Conflict of interest policy, so as the above paragraph says, if you feel that your own work is useful and should be included in the article, then you should suggest it on the article's talk page where other editors without a conflict can decide and if they agree, can add it for you. You can do this using the Template:Request edit. Thanks, Melcous (talk) 23:38, 17 March 2017 (UTC)

Billy Meier
My intention is to make this page Neutral. If I have an agenda is to present several opinions to keep it neutral. Currently this page is not neutral and it has several statements based on links that does not exist.

Rhal Zahi

Alert
Your edits to the Vogel and Meier articles promote a fringe point of view, which is impermissible on Wikipedia. Guy (Help!) 20:03, 22 March 2017 (UTC)