User talk:Rhedyn2

August 2017
Hello, I'm Theroadislong. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Llanelli, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Theroadislong (talk) 16:31, 14 August 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Template:Ddôlfachfarm.org.cymru.uk


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created, Template:Ddôlfachfarm.org.cymru.uk, was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. – Train2104 (t • c) 03:19, 16 August 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Ddôl Fach


A tag has been placed on Ddôl Fach requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

"this is an article about a place that is unremarkable."

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. BIK89 (talk) 17:49, 16 August 2017 (UTC)

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as Ddôl Fawr, to Wikipedia, as doing so is not in accordance with our policies. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read Your first article; you might also consider using the Article Wizard. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Articles must be on subjects which are sufficiently notable to warrant an encyclopaedia article, which this one does not appear to be. My advice to new editors is that it is best to start by making small improvements to existing articles, rather than creating new articles. That way any mistakes you make will be small ones, and you won't have the discouraging experience of repeatedly seeing hours of work deleted. Gradually, you will get to learn how Wikipedia works, and after a while you will know enough about what is acceptable to be able to write whole new articles without fear that they will be deleted. Over the years I have found that editors who start by making small changes to existing articles and work up from there have a far better chance of having a successful time here than those who jump right into creating new articles from the start. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 16:54, 17 August 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Cefncaeau


The article Cefncaeau has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Just a housing estate without evidence of notability."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 16:56, 17 August 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Swiss Valley


The article Swiss Valley has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "No indication of notability per WP:NPLACE."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ... disco spinster   talk  17:17, 17 August 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Swiss Valley for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Swiss Valley is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Swiss Valley until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ... disco spinster   talk  12:59, 18 August 2017 (UTC)

Ways to improve Cwmcarnhywel
Hi, I'm Boleyn. Rhedyn2, thanks for creating Cwmcarnhywel!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Please come back and finish this. It has no sources (all articles need them) and is nowhere near an acceptable level for an encyclopaedia article.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Boleyn (talk) 14:33, 18 August 2017 (UTC)

Your contributed article, Welsh-Afon Llwchwr


Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Welsh-Afon Llwchwr. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – River Loughor. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at River Loughor. If you have new information to add, you might want to discuss it at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. ... disco spinster   talk  19:21, 20 August 2017 (UTC)

A couple of comments about your editing
This is the English language Wikipedia, and all contributions should be in English. If you wish to contribute in Welsh, you should go to Welsh Wikipedia.

I see that you have been putting quite a lot of work into contributing to Wikipedia, and most of your contributions seem to be helpful, so thanks for your work. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 19:38, 20 August 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Ddôl Fach


A tag has been placed on Ddôl Fach requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. CJK09 (talk) 07:53, 28 August 2017 (UTC)

Ways to improve Loughor Bridge
Hi, I'm Domdeparis. Rhedyn2, thanks for creating Loughor Bridge!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. please do not create WP:UNSOURCED articles. All information in wikipedia must be verifiable.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Domdeparis (talk) 09:09, 1 September 2017 (UTC)

September 2017
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Loughor Bridge. ''You have already been notified 3 times about adding unsourced information on Llanelli, Ddôl Fach, and Cwmcarnhywel. '' Domdeparis (talk) 09:14, 1 September 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Ddôl Fach
Hello Rhedyn2,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Ddôl Fach for deletion, because it seems to be an article that was previously deleted by a consensus decision.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Domdeparis (talk) 09:16, 1 September 2017 (UTC)

September 2017
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Cwmbach, Carmarthenshire. Domdeparis (talk) 09:19, 1 September 2017 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Pen-y-graig. Domdeparis (talk) 09:21, 1 September 2017 (UTC)

Horeb article
Hi, isn't this just a duplicate of the Horeb, Carmarthenshire article? I've marked it for deletion on that basis. Let me know if I've got this wrong. Blythwood (talk) 19:28, 4 September 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Horeb, Llanelli


The article Horeb, Llanelli has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Seems to duplicate the Horeb, Carmarthenshire article."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Blythwood (talk) 19:29, 4 September 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Pen-y-graig, Carmarthenshire for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Pen-y-graig, Carmarthenshire is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Pen-y-graig, Carmarthenshire until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.  Dank Jae  18:38, 18 February 2024 (UTC)