User talk:Rhithin

January 2020
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. McSly (talk) 17:31, 11 January 2020 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Dassault Rafale; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing.Nigel Ish (talk) 20:17, 11 January 2020 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

Dassault Rafale‎ Speed
Hello. Just in case you missed it, your change for the speed conversion is incorrect. As explained by the multiple editors who have reverted your change The speed of sound changes with altitude so you cannot use the sea level value for the conversion. Please read WP:MACH-NUMBER. You can also check websites such as this one to see some values for the conversions. That said, keep in mind that since continuing to change to the incorrect value like you have been doing is just wasting everyone's time including yours as it has zero chance of staying in the article. And lastly, since your constant changes are edit warring and getting disruptive, the next time to change the value will result to a report to the admin board to get your account blocked.--McSly (talk) 21:05, 14 January 2020 (UTC)

I got the top speed from the official site of dassault aviation ,the original manufacturers of the aircraft which clearly mentions the site top speed is M1.8 Rhithin (talk) 05:16, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Hello . Thank you for finally talking. We are all clear that the max speed is Mach 1.8, but that's not the change you have been making. You've been changing the conversion from Mach number to km/h . The problem, as explained above by me and in the past few weeks by other editors multiple times, is that the speed of sound is not a constant and varies with altitude. So using the value at sea level doesn't make sense since the top speed is only attained at high altitude. Hopefully, this is clear now. --McSly (talk) 12:36, 15 January 2020 (UTC)

OK Rhithin (talk) 13:51, 15 January 2020 (UTC)

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. McSly (talk) 14:07, 16 January 2020 (UTC)
 * To forestall any further edit warring, you have been blocked from editing Dassault Rafale for 72 hours. Please discuss your changes on Talk:Dassault Rafale. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont)  14:28, 16 January 2020 (UTC)

SPI
I have opened an SPI here: Sockpuppet investigations/Rhithin Mztourist (talk) 03:37, 5 February 2020 (UTC)

March 2020
Your recent editing history at Rafale shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. McSly (talk) 22:21, 26 March 2020 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Dassault Rafale, you may be blocked from editing. See WP:MACH for why your changes are incorrect. BilCat (talk) 22:25, 26 March 2020 (UTC)

This account is once again active, and making the same sorts of edits, as per the discussions at Sockpuppet investigations/Rhithin/Archive. Thanks. - BilCat (talk) 22:35, 26 March 2020 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Mz7 (talk) 23:39, 26 March 2020 (UTC)