User talk:Rhodeislandishome

September 2015
Hello, I'm Skamecrazy123. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Jorge Elorza— because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Skamecrazy123 (talk) 18:00, 20 September 2015 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Jorge Elorza. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Skamecrazy123 (talk) 18:18, 20 September 2015 (UTC)

Hi there, while I appreciate your opinion on this change to Jorge Elorza— it is based on fact and found in numerous web sources. Due to the fact that this is an elected official and his actions etc hold great importance, this information, while it may seem like vandalism to you, is in fact important. I would appreciate you asking before removing work simply because you are not in the know.

Thanks Rhodeislandishome (talk) 18:29, 20 September 2015 (UTC)


 * The burden of proof is on the editor adding content to show that reliable sources support the claim. That is especially true when the article is a biography of a living person. —C.Fred (talk) 18:31, 20 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Never mind the fact that calling someone a basement dweller (as you have basically done here) is an insult. Also, I don't need your permission to edit this page. You do not own it so stop acting like you do, thanks. --Skamecrazy123 (talk) 18:34, 20 September 2015 (UTC)

You are the one editing my content and then telling me that it isn't important. If you lived in RI you would indeed feel it important to know that your mayor [redacted].

No one person owns the internet, it's content is only as good as it's contributors.

Rhodeislandishome (talk) 18:37, 20 September 2015 (UTC)


 * The article says nothing to that effect. Please review WP:BLP: per that policy, the statement you made should be removed even from your talk page. —C.Fred (talk) 18:43, 20 September 2015 (UTC)

The article says nothing to that effect. As someone who is working directly on this issue-- I can attest to the fact that these edits are vandalism and are being posted by an opposing group of the mayors and can be linked directly to his police investigation. http://wpri.com/2015/09/14/police-investigating-threat-to-burn-mayor-elorzas-house-down1/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.225.63.66 (talk) 14:28, 21 September 2015 (UTC)