User talk:RhodesAvenue

Archive-- permalink to removed discussions and block notices.

Indefinite block for sockpuppetry
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. As per the above, creating User:Car1990 to continue editing is the final straw. Any new articles that you create with additional accounts will be immediately deleted and any edits you make will be reverted, regardless of their content. The only way you will be able to edit Wikipedia without this happening will be to appeal your block on this account and explain why you have consistently resorted to sockpuppetry when blocked. Number  5  7  23:24, 31 January 2018 (UTC)


 * This fails to address the reason why you were blocked prior to starting using sockpuppets. Will you stop creating articles with all the issues that you have been repeatedly asked to resolve? Number   5  7  11:56, 1 February 2018 (UTC)

I will stop using other sockpuppets and there will also try to fix the other articles which i have been asked to fix using this account. i therefore hope to be unblocked so that i am able to fix these issues. (talk)}}

Unblocking
Dear other Wikipedia editors, it would be so grateful if were to unblock my Rhodes Avenue account so that i will be able to contribute to Wikipedia by updating football season articles on a weekly basis. I will have therefore learnt from my mistakes in the past, so I will hopefully contribute to better articles in the future. I have therefore decided to delete my other accounts so that I can concentrate on only using this account. RhodesAvenue (talk) RhodesAvenue (talk) 00:31, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
 * You didn't decide to delete them. They were blocked because they were sockpuppets. Number   5  7  11:57, 1 February 2018 (UTC)

I will therefore decided to use only this account in the future to either update articles or to create new arcticles by only using this account. (talk)
 * It's too late to stop doing what you should not have done. -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 12:10, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Sockpuppetry destroys the trust of the community. We cannot trust you to now go forward as if nothing had happened. At some point the door may reopen for you to gain our trust.
 * Please list all user accounts you have used as a first step. -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 12:10, 1 February 2018 (UTC)

RhodesAvenue Car1990 Biglad1990

Asking that others edit on your behalf while you are blocked, is a direct violation of WP:SOCK and WP:BLOCK. I'm disappointed; you explicitly claim to understand our policy on sockpuppets. As your unblock requests are going nowhere, I'm revoking talk page access. Another admin will be along shortly to review your block. If they decline your unblock request, you are free to request an unblock in six months, assuming you make zero edits in the meanwhile. You'll need to use WP:UTRS at that time. --Yamla (talk) 13:06, 1 February 2018 (UTC)


 * User is now using sockpuppets to appeal: . Talkpage access removed for all known socks. Yunshui 雲 水 11:42, 2 February 2018 (UTC)

--UTRSBot (talk) 17:17, 6 February 2018 (UTC)

Avoiding block
Unfortunately it seems likely that RhodesAvenue has created additional sock puppets to avoid the block. This includes (interaction utility) and. I also suspect the IP's (interaction utility) and  (interaction utility) are RhodesAvenue as well (also, both IP's are from Chesterfield, which was previously mentioned by one of the socks). S.A. Julio (talk) 15:12, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
 * I've blocked Chesterfieldlad and Football 258 and reverted all their edits/deleted all their new articles. The IPs are probably him too, but perhaps worth asking someone like Bbb23 if a checkuser can be done. Number   5  7  15:22, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
 * RhodesAvenue and all the already-blocked suspected socks are ✅. I found no other accounts. . Given the number of accounts, it would be appreciated if you would open an SPI. After you do, I can confirm everything for the record at the SPI (please ping me if you create a case). Thanks.--Bbb23 (talk) 16:16, 9 February 2018 (UTC)

Alright, thanks again. Now it seems as though RhodesAvenue has created another sock, (interaction utility). S.A. Julio (talk) 06:54, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Blocked. Going through and reverting all contributions from that block-evading sockpuppet. --Yamla (talk) 12:35, 11 February 2018 (UTC)

The account seems to be the latest sock they've created. S.A. Julio (talk) 17:49, 17 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Now blocked. RhodesAvenue: The more socks you create, the less likely it is that you'll ever be unblocked. Take the advice above and give it a rest for at least six months and then come back. At the moment you're almost certainly heading for a site ban and never being allowed to edit again. Number   5  7  18:09, 17 February 2018 (UTC)
 * They've most likely continued with the account, should an SPI be opened at this point? S.A. Julio (talk) 23:16, 19 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Blocked, tagged, and reverted. The WP:CBAN procedures are likely to change in the near future. This user will almost certainly be banned once that happens, unless they immediately stop with the violations of WP:SOCK and WP:BLOCK. --Yamla (talk) 23:58, 19 February 2018 (UTC)

And it continues with. S.A. Julio (talk) 23:06, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Blocked and all edits reverted. Seriously mate, give up – you're just wasting your own time now. Number   5  7  23:09, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Now they've likely created the account . S.A. Julio (talk) 00:21, 24 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Blocked, reverted. --Yamla (talk) 00:52, 24 February 2018 (UTC)

They are persistent, seems likely to be the newest sock. S.A. Julio (talk) 17:13, 26 February 2018 (UTC)
 * The newest sock is probably . It seems unlikely they will stop creating the sock puppets, should further action be taken? S.A. Julio (talk) 19:52, 3 March 2018 (UTC)

New sock is. S.A. Julio (talk) 18:27, 6 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Already blocked and reverted, looks like. Wikipedia's policies are about to change, at which point this user will be WP:CBAN'ed. --Yamla (talk) 19:32, 6 March 2018 (UTC)

--UTRSBot (talk) 22:43, 12 February 2018 (UTC) --UTRSBot (talk) 10:36, 13 February 2018 (UTC) --UTRSBot (talk) 09:10, 18 February 2018 (UTC) --UTRSBot (talk) 11:48, 10 March 2018 (UTC)

Recent socks
I've just realised that is a RhodesAvenue sock (creating season articles with an identical sentence formula in the introduction), so have indef blocked them too. Number  5  7  23:19, 30 November 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of 2017 FK Trakai season for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2017 FK Trakai season is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/2017 FK Trakai season until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. HawkAussie (talk) 00:38, 4 November 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of 2013–14 FC Wohlen season for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2013–14 FC Wohlen season is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/2013–14 FC Wohlen season until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. HawkAussie (talk) 00:16, 5 November 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of 2013–14 SC Eendracht Aalst season for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2013–14 SC Eendracht Aalst season is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/2013–14 SC Eendracht Aalst season until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. HawkAussie (talk) 00:16, 5 November 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of 2017–18 PFC Beroe Stara Zagora season


The article 2017–18 PFC Beroe Stara Zagora season has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Fails WP:NSEASONS and WP:GNG"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. HawkAussie (talk) 00:19, 5 November 2019 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:2015–16 AEK Larnaca F.C. season


Hello, RhodesAvenue. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "2015–16 AEK Larnaca F.C. season".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the, , or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Lapablo (talk) 09:40, 6 May 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:2013–14 AEK Kouklia F.C. season


Hello, RhodesAvenue. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "2013–14 AEK Kouklia F.C. season".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the, , or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Lapablo (talk) 09:43, 6 May 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:2014–15 ASA Târgu Mureș (2013) season


Hello, RhodesAvenue. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "2014–15 ASA Târgu Mureș (2013) season".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the, , or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Lapablo (talk) 09:51, 6 May 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:2014–15 Achilles '29 season


Hello, RhodesAvenue. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "2014–15 Achilles '29 season".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the, , or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 07:23, 13 July 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:2016–17 HNK Cibalia season


Hello, RhodesAvenue. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "2016–17 HNK Cibalia season".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the, , or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 15:06, 15 July 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of 2016–17 FC Schaffhausen season for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2016–17 FC Schaffhausen season is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/2016–17 FC Schaffhausen season until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Spiderone 15:28, 10 November 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of 2014–15 FC Winterthur season for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2014–15 FC Winterthur season is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/2014–15 FC Winterthur season until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Spiderone 15:35, 10 November 2020 (UTC)

Sockpuppet investigation
Sakiv (talk) 19:27, 12 July 2021 (UTC)