User talk:Rhodgk2/sandbox

The material presented, though limited, reads as neutral and factual. The sources look reliable: I particularly like the range of local information from the Louisiana source and wider-range information from the secondary source Ofeuch1 (talk) 21:55, 16 March 2021 (UTC)

The information is very interesting! It seems unbiased and truthful. There isn't much to edit because it's in the beginning stages. The sources looked good! Claireneal (talk) 21:59, 16 March 2021 (UTC)

Adding additional information regarding “Cant Beat Em’ Eat Em” campaign would be a good place to input new information to the existing Wikipedia page. Also, as we talked about in our group, updating the litigation section that has been dormant since the 2010s could be a great way to benefit the page. Your variation between local and government resources is good to give a cultural and official perspective on the pervasive issue. Julienpleb (talk) 22:04, 30 March 2021 (UTC)

Your language is very neutral and you have done a lot of research. I think now you should focus on creating a coherent narrative. How can you put together your evidence (esp. on the litigation section) into a story? Is there anything you can add to the 'eat em' campaign? You will want to make sure that your contributions fit into the story that is already being constructed on the main page. Also, feel free to add more information on Louisiana if you find it. Brendankarch (talk) 15:19, 31 March 2021 (UTC)