User talk:RhomeTea

Regarding your addition to List of tea companies
If you have a close connection to some of the people, places or things you have written about, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred from the tone of the edit and the proximity of the editor to the subject, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:
 * 1) editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
 * 2) participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors; and
 * 3) linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Spam).

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. For more details about what, exactly, constitutes a conflict of interest, please see our conflict of interest guidelines. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 08:01, 24 August 2009 (UTC)

Experiementation and tagging
Wikipdia is not an experiment in social marketing. You may want to read this, Spam

Do not remove speedy deletion tags. Your holdon message will be read and considered before your article is deleted. SchmuckyTheCat (talk)

Moved discussion
The Our Home Tea page has been designed to facilitate a discussion in the furtherance of social networks as a marketing tool. As we move from "interruption advertising" or "in your face" promotion to a model which places products "at easy access" for the consumer yet not "bothering" the consumer. If I am reading an online book how can I as a consumer come to a social agreement with a vendor that I will consider his offer if I am not being manipulated away from my primary task - reading the book. This article will be developed to enjoin that debate using an actual registered entity (Our Home Tea). I have just started this and hope to establish a conversation with other users on how to best present this social experiment. What better place than Wikipedia to develop an encyclopedic reservoir for the creation of a totally new paradigm? Please join me in this "adventure". Thanks Wikipedia for a great platform to develop this working, living think tank.RhomeTea (talk) 06:15, 27 August 2009 (UTC) hans
 * Sorry Hans but that's a no go. Firstly, your article is written like advertising material, so it isn't suitable for Wikipedia. Most importantly Wikipedia is a project to build a free encyclopedia, not a place for experiments and discussions about "the furtherance of social networks as a marketing tool". I've deleted the article and will delete this talk page soon and you're going to have to find another website for pursuing this social experiment and discussion. If you're interested in contributing to an encyclopedia, you're most welcome to join us, but that's all we're doing here and we don't provide resources for social experiments and discussions unrelated to the project of building an encyclopedia. Sarah 07:29, 27 August 2009 (UTC)