User talk:RhondaBo

May 2022
Hello, I'm LuK3. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person   on Paul Koretz, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! --   LuK3      (Talk)   15:56, 5 May 2022 (UTC)


 * Hi, we have cited the content now, and corrected someone's change, which incorrectly summarized the situation. I hope that my contribution will stay as it is now. RhondaBo (talk) 03:07, 9 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Hi, I was wondering which part of the summary you consider inaccurate. I think the longer version does not seem neutral in its point of view. See NPOV for more information. Zaelzo (talk) 16:52, 9 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Hi, thanks for getting in touch. What is inaccurate is that you said they were suing him for taking part in this surveillance when in fact, they are suing him for failing to respond to a public records request, as he is required to do. This is a major difference and is not taking a side, but is a simple reporting of the facts. RhondaBo (talk) 17:03, 9 May 2022 (UTC)
 * I see what you mean. However, the current version appears to exactly match the City Watch LA article, which I think violates Wikipedia policy. I think the most appropriate course of action in this situation would be to use the abbreviated version but be clearer about the focus on the public records request. Zaelzo (talk) 17:35, 9 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Okay. I'll rewrite it. RhondaBo (talk) 19:31, 9 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Done—my words, brief and factual. RhondaBo (talk) 19:41, 9 May 2022 (UTC)